Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #158047

Re: recommended free email?

From	Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid>
Newsgroups	alt.folklore.computers
Subject	Re: recommended free email?
Date	2016-01-28 20:57 +0000
Organization	NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95
Message-ID	<n8dvbp01gnd@news4.newsguy.com> (permalink)
References	(10 earlier) <de91f1d5-5e00-4544-9f36-dc528a56e37a@googlegroups.com> <6edfabde5c14e81jbd7ksva2svj1r2iud3@4ax.com> <n88dv9$bhr$2@dont-email.me> <89udnQTIOefArjTLnZ2dnUU7-WmdnZ2d@giganews.com> <1be10a18-43e9-4c29-9cea-7d8bf7189257@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 2016-01-28, hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com <hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com> wrote:

> On Wednesday, January 27, 2016 at 4:15:11 PM UTC-5, Jon Elson wrote:
>
>> Right, the whole concept of Windows is run any script, program, screensaver 
>> or installer that comes in on an image file, email, web page or whatever.
>> What idiocy!
>
> Yes, indeed.
>
> Going into manual mode is a pain in the $##$.
>
> I'm learning that Google does the same thing--highly automated, even
> when one doesn't want it to be.  Going into manual mode is a PITA.

I've noticed more and more that the problem with modern gadgets and
software is not in getting them to do what you want, but in preventing 
them from doing what you don't want.

-- 
/~\  cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid (Charlie Gibbs)
\ /  I'm really at ac.dekanfrus if you read it the right way.
 X   Top-posted messages will probably be ignored.  See RFC1855.
/ \  HTML will DEFINITELY be ignored.  Join the ASCII ribbon campaign!

Thread

recommended free email? hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-22 10:16 -0800
  Re: recommended free email? philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-22 12:59 -0600
    Re: recommended free email? mausg@mail.com - 2016-01-22 19:05 +0000
    Re: recommended free email? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-01-22 14:23 -0500
  Re: recommended free email? Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-22 13:32 -0600
    Re: recommended free email? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-01-22 20:31 +0000
      Re: recommended free email? Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-22 17:10 -0600
        Re: recommended free email? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-01-22 19:09 -0500
  Re: recommended free email? Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-22 15:45 -0500
    Re: recommended free email? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-01-22 21:19 +0000
  Re: recommended free email? Jon Elson <elson@pico-systems.com> - 2016-01-22 14:49 -0600
    Re: recommended free email? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-01-23 04:58 +0000
  Re: recommended free email? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-01-22 22:52 +0000
    Re: recommended free email? Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> - 2016-01-27 14:57 -0600
      Re: recommended free email? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-01-27 21:47 +0000
  Re: recommended free email? "kipg" <io@nospam.com> - 2016-01-23 12:58 +1100
    Re: recommended free email? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-01-23 10:57 -0500
      Re: recommended free email? mausg@mail.com - 2016-01-23 16:49 +0000
        Re: recommended free email? "kipg" <io@nospam.com> - 2016-01-24 04:42 +1100
        Re: recommended free email? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-01-23 20:24 +0000
      Re: recommended free email? "kipg" <io@nospam.com> - 2016-01-24 04:34 +1100
      Re: recommended free email? Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> - 2016-01-27 15:00 -0600
        Re: recommended free email? Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-27 17:22 -0600
          Re: recommended free email? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-01-28 11:46 -0500
            Re: recommended free email? Whiskers <catwheezel@operamail.com> - 2016-01-31 13:36 +0000
              Re: recommended free email? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-01-31 11:03 -0500
                Re: recommended free email? Whiskers <catwheezel@operamail.com> - 2016-01-31 17:29 +0000
  Re: recommended free email? Stephen Wolstenholme <steve@easynn.com> - 2016-01-23 09:25 +0000
  Re: recommended free email? David Wade <dave.g4ugm@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 10:31 +0000
    Re: recommended free email? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-01-23 13:54 +0000
      Re: recommended free email? Stephen Wolstenholme <steve@easynn.com> - 2016-01-23 14:58 +0000
        Re: recommended free email? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-01-23 15:35 +0000
          Re: recommended free email? Stephen Wolstenholme <steve@easynn.com> - 2016-01-23 16:04 +0000
      Re: recommended free email? mausg@mail.com - 2016-01-23 16:42 +0000
        Re: recommended free email? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 13:39 -0500
      Re: recommended free email? David Wade <dave.g4ugm@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 00:43 +0000
        Re: recommended free email? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-01-24 10:56 +0000
          Re: recommended free email? David Wade <dave.g4ugm@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 16:27 +0000
            Re: recommended free email? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-01-24 16:34 +0000
          Re: recommended free email? Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-24 11:53 -0600
            Re: recommended free email? Stan Barr <plan.b@bluesomatic.org> - 2016-01-25 08:22 +0000
              Re: recommended free email? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-01-25 11:25 +0000
              Re: recommended free email? Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-01-25 13:32 +0100
            Re: recommended free email? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-01-25 11:21 +0000
              Re: recommended free email? Stephen Wolstenholme <steve@easynn.com> - 2016-01-25 14:18 +0000
                Re: recommended free email? hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-25 09:54 -0800
                Re: recommended free email? Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2016-01-25 13:56 -0600
                Re: recommended free email? hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-26 08:10 -0800
                Re: recommended free email? JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 12:07 -0600
                Re: recommended free email? Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-01-26 13:32 -0500
                Re: recommended free email? Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> - 2016-01-27 15:15 -0600
                Re: recommended free email? hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-28 10:33 -0800
                Re: recommended free email? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-01-28 20:57 +0000
                Re: recommended free email? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-01-28 21:47 +0000
                Re: recommended free email? RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2016-02-06 20:20 +0300
                Re: recommended free email? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-01-28 20:50 +0000
                Re: recommended free email? hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-01-26 11:06 -0800
                Re: recommended free email? Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-26 16:13 -0600
                Re: recommended free email? JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 21:32 -0600
                Re: recommended free email? JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 21:20 -0600
                Re: recommended free email? "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 19:19 -0500
                Re: recommended free email? Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-01-25 15:45 -0600
                Re: recommended free email? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-01-25 22:24 +0000
                Re: recommended free email? Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> - 2016-01-27 15:11 -0600
                Re: recommended free email? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-01-25 18:14 +0000
  Re: recommended free email? Whiskers <catwheezel@operamail.com> - 2016-01-23 18:42 +0000

csiph-web