Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #548282
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: A QUESTION ABOUT THE NEW FOUND STAR -X9 |
| Date | 2016-01-26 14:38 +0000 |
| Organization | The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 |
| Message-ID | <n880cr$k0b$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink) |
| References | <80cc328d-f1dd-4271-ae05-13d8e77d7335@googlegroups.com> <n85g1e$10v2$1@gioia.aioe.org> <7d7e5279-729e-41a1-a214-9c525371f90f@googlegroups.com> |
"Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> writes: >On Monday, January 25, 2016 at 5:47:08 PM UTC+2, Efftard K. Donglemeier wrote: >> I just did a Google search for >> >> new star X9 >> >> and got no results. >> >> What the fuck are you blithering about this time? >========================== >i asked >whether the scientists that >found (by calculations ) the x 9 star >if they used GR in their calculations >**including dark matter** > **that is **evenly spread *allover the universe >---- >if you don t know >just say >I DON T KNOW !! >is that question clearer now ?? Since I also never heard of any new star "X9" and also see nothing about any new star "X9" in Google, I guess the question remains, WTF are you blithering about? Might as well ask whether scientists used GR when they calculated the weight of pregnant unicorns.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
A QUESTION ABOUT THE NEW FOUND STAR -X9 "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 22:47 -0800
Re: A QUESTION ABOUT THE NEW FOUND STAR -X9 "Efftard K. Donglemeier" <invalid@example.com> - 2016-01-25 07:47 -0800
Re: A QUESTION ABOUT THE NEW FOUND STAR -X9 "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 23:56 -0800
Re: A QUESTION ABOUT THE NEW FOUND STAR -X9 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-01-26 14:38 +0000
Re: A QUESTION ABOUT THE NEW FOUND STAR -X9 john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 06:42 -0800
Re: A QUESTION ABOUT THE NEW FOUND STAR -X9 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-01-26 15:26 +0000
Re: A QUESTION ABOUT THE NEW FOUND STAR -X9 "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 11:29 -0800
Re: A QUESTION ABOUT THE NEW FOUND STAR -X9 "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 11:13 -0800
Re: A QUESTION ABOUT THE NEW FOUND STAR -X9 "Albert Robbins" <invalide@example.com> - 2016-01-26 13:59 -0800
Re: A QUESTION ABOUT THE NEW FOUND STAR -X9 "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 22:19 -0800
Re: A QUESTION ABOUT THE NEW FOUND STAR -X9 "Robert Allen" <invalid@example.com> - 2016-01-27 06:59 -0800
Re: A QUESTION ABOUT THE NEW FOUND STAR -X9 "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 07:35 -0800
Re: A QUESTION ABOUT THE NEW FOUND STAR -X9 "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 08:32 -0800
Re: A QUESTION ABOUT THE NEW FOUND STAR -X9 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-01-27 16:05 +0000
Re: A QUESTION ABOUT THE NEW FOUND STAR -X9 "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 10:41 -0800
Re: A QUESTION ABOUT THE NEW FOUND STAR -X9 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-01-27 19:09 +0000
Re: A QUESTION ABOUT THE NEW FOUND STAR -X9 "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 12:13 -0800
Re: A QUESTION ABOUT THE NEW FOUND STAR -X9 "Mapihal" <invalid@example.com> - 2016-01-27 12:27 -0800
Re: A QUESTION ABOUT THE NEW FOUND STAR -X9 R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-01-27 20:35 +0000
Re: A QUESTION ABOUT THE NEW FOUND STAR -X9 "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 23:10 -0800
Re: A QUESTION ABOUT THE NEW FOUND STAR -X9 moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-01-27 20:41 +0000
Re: A QUESTION ABOUT THE NEW FOUND STAR -X9 "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 23:20 -0800
csiph-web