Re: "Linux is not fragmented; it's united"

From	"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	alt.comp.freeware
Subject	Re: "Linux is not fragmented; it's united"
Date	2016-01-26 22:05 +0800
Organization	Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong
Message-ID	<n87ua2$17b$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<a5kcabpbcgpfb63qlvm7047fsip0uo19h8@net.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Linux *distributions* fragments, not the kernel and various applications! ;)

On 1/26/2016 12:53 AM, Yrrah wrote:
> "One of the things that some people say about the Linux platform is
> that it's fragmented (...)."
> Using the term fragmented to describe Linux is not correct. If
> anything, Linux is one of the most cohesive platforms available right
> now and that's actually really easy to prove. The biggest problem
> Linux has seems to be the large number of distributions available, but
> that's only an illusion.


-- 
   @~@   Remain silent. Nothing from soldiers and magicians is real!
  / v \  Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and farces be with you!
/( _ )\ (Fedora release 23)  Linux 4.3.3-301.fc23.x86_64
   ^ ^   17:57:01 up 19:22 0 users load average: 1.11 1.07 1.05
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa

Back to alt.comp.freeware | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

"Linux is not fragmented; it's united" Yrrah <Yrrah-acf@acf.invalid> - 2016-01-25 17:53 +0100
  Re: "Linux is not fragmented; it's united" Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2016-01-25 09:15 -0800
    Re: "Linux is not fragmented; it's united" mike <ham789@netzero.net> - 2016-01-25 12:26 -0800
      Re: "Linux is not fragmented; it's united" Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2016-01-25 12:57 -0800
      Re: "Linux is not fragmented; it's united" »Q« <boxcars@gmx.net> - 2016-01-25 15:05 -0600
        Re: "Linux is not fragmented; it's united" Mark Warner <mhwarner.inhibitions@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 16:25 -0500
      Re: "Linux is not fragmented; it's united" Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2016-01-25 20:24 -0200
      Re: "Linux is not fragmented; it's united" Spamblk <ZapSpam@SpamMeNot.invalid> - 2016-01-26 13:49 +0000
        Re: "Linux is not fragmented; it's united" »Q« <boxcars@gmx.net> - 2016-01-26 09:10 -0600
          Re: "Linux is not fragmented; it's united" Spamblk <ZapSpam@SpamMeNot.invalid> - 2016-01-26 19:34 +0000
  Re: "Linux is not fragmented; it's united" Mark Warner <mhwarner.inhibitions@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 16:28 -0500
  Re: "Linux is not fragmented; it's united" "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 22:05 +0800

csiph-web