Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.freeware > #253357
| From | Mark Warner <mhwarner.inhibitions@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.freeware |
| Subject | Re: "Linux is not fragmented; it's united" |
| Date | 2016-01-25 16:25 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <dgni6nF8i5pU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <a5kcabpbcgpfb63qlvm7047fsip0uo19h8@net.com> <dgn3ieF4odsU1@mid.individual.net> <n860a8$os8$1@dont-email.me> <20160125150525.1c8f1eb1@sepulchrave.remarqs> |
On 1/25/2016 4:05 PM, »Q« wrote: > mike <ham789@netzero.net> wrote: >> >> On the user end of that stick, if you have a problem, you google for >> a solution. You get a zillion hits. The one you pick won't work for >> you because your version of this distro with that user interface >> came with a different set of tools and utilities. So, you try to load >> those tools and run into another layer of potential incompatibilities >> to deal with. It's the linux onion of tears. > > The hypothetical user you've introduced for rhetorical purposes, to > whom you refer as "you", needs to pick a distro with better > documentation and support forums. I haven't hit a problem even remotely > close to what you describe in over a decade, and even then nothing > close to the severity you express. He's in a singular class of stupid. -- Mark Warner ...lose .inhibitions when replying
Back to alt.comp.freeware | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
"Linux is not fragmented; it's united" Yrrah <Yrrah-acf@acf.invalid> - 2016-01-25 17:53 +0100
Re: "Linux is not fragmented; it's united" Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2016-01-25 09:15 -0800
Re: "Linux is not fragmented; it's united" mike <ham789@netzero.net> - 2016-01-25 12:26 -0800
Re: "Linux is not fragmented; it's united" Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2016-01-25 12:57 -0800
Re: "Linux is not fragmented; it's united" »Q« <boxcars@gmx.net> - 2016-01-25 15:05 -0600
Re: "Linux is not fragmented; it's united" Mark Warner <mhwarner.inhibitions@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 16:25 -0500
Re: "Linux is not fragmented; it's united" Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2016-01-25 20:24 -0200
Re: "Linux is not fragmented; it's united" Spamblk <ZapSpam@SpamMeNot.invalid> - 2016-01-26 13:49 +0000
Re: "Linux is not fragmented; it's united" »Q« <boxcars@gmx.net> - 2016-01-26 09:10 -0600
Re: "Linux is not fragmented; it's united" Spamblk <ZapSpam@SpamMeNot.invalid> - 2016-01-26 19:34 +0000
Re: "Linux is not fragmented; it's united" Mark Warner <mhwarner.inhibitions@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 16:28 -0500
Re: "Linux is not fragmented; it's united" "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 22:05 +0800
csiph-web