Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #340321

Re: [OT] RIP David Bowie ;(

From DFS <nospam@dfs.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: [OT] RIP David Bowie ;(
Date 2016-01-11 11:34 -0500
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <n70lfh$unb$4@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <20160111093534.7f6fee3d@maxa-pc> <fcb79btpkap4g8ts41h78fg6d1vcn15fep@4ax.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 1/11/2016 8:29 AM, shitv wrote:

> I'll consider myself lucky if I reach 69.


Your daughter will probably knife you before then, turd.

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[OT] RIP David Bowie ;( Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-01-11 09:35 +0100
  Re: [OT] RIP David Bowie ;( Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-11 05:44 -0500
  Re: [OT] RIP David Bowie ;( Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-11 03:47 -0800
  Re: [OT] RIP David Bowie ;( chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-11 07:29 -0600
    Re: [OT] RIP David Bowie ;( Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-01-11 14:44 +0000
    Re: [OT] RIP David Bowie ;( DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-11 11:34 -0500
      Re: [OT] RIP David Bowie ;( Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-01-11 13:04 -0500
  Re: [OT] RIP David Bowie ;( John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 05:58 -0800
  Re: [OT] RIP David Bowie ;( Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-01-11 10:20 -0500
  Re: [OT] RIP David Bowie ;( -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-01-11 07:30 -0800
    Re: [OT] RIP David Bowie ;( Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 10:11 -0800
      Re: [OT] RIP David Bowie ;( "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-01-11 19:49 -0500
        Re: [OT] RIP David Bowie ;( Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-01-12 14:58 +0000
          Re: [OT] RIP David Bowie ;( "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-01-12 17:01 -0500
            Re: [OT] RIP David Bowie ;( Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-01-13 13:24 +0000
              Re: [OT] RIP David Bowie ;( John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-01-13 07:20 -0800
        Re: [OT] RIP David Bowie ;( Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 09:02 -0800
    Re: [OT] RIP David Bowie ;( Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-01-11 23:51 +0000
  David Bowie was bad news and at best was good for perhaps one or two songs John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 05:09 -0800
    Re: David Bowie was bad news and at best was good for perhaps one or two songs Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-01-12 15:00 +0000
      Re: David Bowie was bad news and at best was good for perhaps one or two songs John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 07:20 -0800
        Re: David Bowie was bad news and at best was good for perhaps one or two songs Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 07:46 -0800
          Re: David Bowie was bad news and at best was good for perhaps one or two songs Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 09:04 -0800
      Re: David Bowie was bad news and at best was good for perhaps one or two songs ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 19:54 +0000
        Re: David Bowie was bad news and at best was good for perhaps one or two songs Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-01-12 17:42 -0500
          Re: David Bowie was bad news and at best was good for perhaps one or two songs owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-13 00:06 +0000
            Re: David Bowie was bad news and at best was good for perhaps one or two songs Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-01-12 19:25 -0500
            Re: David Bowie was good news and at best was good for perhaps one or two dozen songs DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-13 00:31 -0500
              Re: David Bowie was good news and at best was good for perhaps one or two dozen songs owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-13 06:14 +0000
                Re: David Bowie was good news and at best was good for perhaps one or two dozen songs DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-13 12:24 -0500
              Re: David Bowie was good news and at best was good for perhaps one or two dozen songs Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-01-13 13:23 +0000
                Re: David Bowie was good news and at best was good for perhaps one or two dozen songs chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-13 13:41 +0000
                Re: David Bowie rocked. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-01-13 17:40 +0000
                Re: David Bowie rocked. Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> - 2016-01-13 20:25 +0100
                Re: David Bowie rocked. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-01-13 13:49 -0800
    Re: David Bowie was bad news and at best was good for perhaps one or two songs DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-12 11:15 -0500
      Re: David Bowie was bad news and at best was good for perhaps one or two songs John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 09:44 -0800
    Re: David Bowie was bad news and at best was good for perhaps one or two songs Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-01-13 09:27 +0000
      Re: David Bowie was bad news and at best was good for perhaps one or two songs John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-01-13 04:56 -0800

csiph-web