Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #340416
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: David Bowie was bad news and at best was good for perhaps one or two songs |
| Date | 2016-01-13 00:06 +0000 |
| Organization | O.W.L. |
| Message-ID | <thgd93.r0r3@rooftop.invalid> (permalink) |
| References | <20160111093534.7f6fee3d@maxa-pc> <29e29fe7-a1e8-4de0-bc6d-88a784aa591f@googlegroups.com> <n734ek$g5s$2@tattoovampire.eternal-september.org> <n73lmj$o16$1@dont-email.me> <n73vc4$vqc$1@dont-email.me> |
Slimer <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > On 2016-01-12 2:54 PM, ronb wrote: >> On Tue, 12 Jan 2016 15:00:36 +0000, Tattoo Vampire wrote: >> >>> Once you escape the confines of country and western music, John, you >>> might learn to appreciate Bowie. :-P >> >> Not everybody likes every musician. I honestly can't think of one Bowie >> song that I like. Choice is good in music as well as in Linux >> distributions. > > I don't know how anyone could not like Golden Years. However, I have to > say that I found Bowie's music to be pretty awful as well. > Fame. China Girl. Space Oddity. That's about it for me.
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[OT] RIP David Bowie ;( Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-01-11 09:35 +0100
Re: [OT] RIP David Bowie ;( Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-11 05:44 -0500
Re: [OT] RIP David Bowie ;( Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-11 03:47 -0800
Re: [OT] RIP David Bowie ;( chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-11 07:29 -0600
Re: [OT] RIP David Bowie ;( Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-01-11 14:44 +0000
Re: [OT] RIP David Bowie ;( DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-11 11:34 -0500
Re: [OT] RIP David Bowie ;( Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-01-11 13:04 -0500
Re: [OT] RIP David Bowie ;( John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 05:58 -0800
Re: [OT] RIP David Bowie ;( Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-01-11 10:20 -0500
Re: [OT] RIP David Bowie ;( -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-01-11 07:30 -0800
Re: [OT] RIP David Bowie ;( Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 10:11 -0800
Re: [OT] RIP David Bowie ;( "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-01-11 19:49 -0500
Re: [OT] RIP David Bowie ;( Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-01-12 14:58 +0000
Re: [OT] RIP David Bowie ;( "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-01-12 17:01 -0500
Re: [OT] RIP David Bowie ;( Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-01-13 13:24 +0000
Re: [OT] RIP David Bowie ;( John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-01-13 07:20 -0800
Re: [OT] RIP David Bowie ;( Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 09:02 -0800
Re: [OT] RIP David Bowie ;( Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-01-11 23:51 +0000
David Bowie was bad news and at best was good for perhaps one or two songs John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 05:09 -0800
Re: David Bowie was bad news and at best was good for perhaps one or two songs Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-01-12 15:00 +0000
Re: David Bowie was bad news and at best was good for perhaps one or two songs John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 07:20 -0800
Re: David Bowie was bad news and at best was good for perhaps one or two songs Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 07:46 -0800
Re: David Bowie was bad news and at best was good for perhaps one or two songs Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 09:04 -0800
Re: David Bowie was bad news and at best was good for perhaps one or two songs ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 19:54 +0000
Re: David Bowie was bad news and at best was good for perhaps one or two songs Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-01-12 17:42 -0500
Re: David Bowie was bad news and at best was good for perhaps one or two songs owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-13 00:06 +0000
Re: David Bowie was bad news and at best was good for perhaps one or two songs Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-01-12 19:25 -0500
Re: David Bowie was good news and at best was good for perhaps one or two dozen songs DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-13 00:31 -0500
Re: David Bowie was good news and at best was good for perhaps one or two dozen songs owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-13 06:14 +0000
Re: David Bowie was good news and at best was good for perhaps one or two dozen songs DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-13 12:24 -0500
Re: David Bowie was good news and at best was good for perhaps one or two dozen songs Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-01-13 13:23 +0000
Re: David Bowie was good news and at best was good for perhaps one or two dozen songs chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-13 13:41 +0000
Re: David Bowie rocked. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-01-13 17:40 +0000
Re: David Bowie rocked. Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> - 2016-01-13 20:25 +0100
Re: David Bowie rocked. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-01-13 13:49 -0800
Re: David Bowie was bad news and at best was good for perhaps one or two songs DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-12 11:15 -0500
Re: David Bowie was bad news and at best was good for perhaps one or two songs John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 09:44 -0800
Re: David Bowie was bad news and at best was good for perhaps one or two songs Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-01-13 09:27 +0000
Re: David Bowie was bad news and at best was good for perhaps one or two songs John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-01-13 04:56 -0800
csiph-web