Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #6110
| From | Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: Here is my conclusion about C++ |
| Date | 2015-12-30 20:11 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <n61dlb$ru2$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <n61cun$otj$1@dont-email.me> |
On 30/12/15 23:00, Ramine wrote: > Hello, > > > I think C++ is good for reatime safety critical systems, because: The choice of language is far less important than the choice of programmer. I would choose a programmer who is capable of rational thought and who is able to construct a sound technical argument. I would not choose one who posts the same correction to a Usenet newsgroup four times in three minutes. Nor would I choose a programmer who thinks that 'using namespace std;' is good C++. Nor would I choose a programmer who is unable to interact properly with other technical people, or a programmer who thinks it's good practice to place the response to an article /above/ the article to which it is replying. I'm fussy like that. -- Richard Heathfield Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk "Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999 Sig line 4 vacant - apply within
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Here is my conclusion about C++ Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-12-30 20:11 +0000
csiph-web