Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.programming > #6110

Re: Here is my conclusion about C++

From Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk>
Newsgroups comp.programming
Subject Re: Here is my conclusion about C++
Date 2015-12-30 20:11 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <n61dlb$ru2$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <n61cun$otj$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


On 30/12/15 23:00, Ramine wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I think C++ is good for reatime safety critical systems, because:

The choice of language is far less important than the choice of 
programmer. I would choose a programmer who is capable of rational 
thought and who is able to construct a sound technical argument. I would 
not choose one who posts the same correction to a Usenet newsgroup four 
times in three minutes. Nor would I choose a programmer who thinks that 
'using namespace std;' is good C++. Nor would I choose a programmer who 
is unable to interact properly with other technical people, or a 
programmer who thinks it's good practice to place the response to an 
article /above/ the article to which it is replying.

I'm fussy like that.

-- 
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within

Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Here is my conclusion about C++ Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-12-30 20:11 +0000

csiph-web