Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #531476
| From | gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Driverless cars will change the way we think of car ownership |
| Date | 2015-11-09 12:59 -0600 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <n1qqfc$ghe$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <gtidndHpWbGrkqPLnZ2dnUU7-UOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <7a8f1e10-74a6-48e5-b506-7435ff8d46c2@googlegroups.com> <Tis%x.6238$1Z.2949@fx01.iad> |
On 11/7/2015 1:29 PM, benj wrote: > On 11/07/2015 01:59 PM, Double-A wrote: >> >> Double-A > > AA you vastly underestimate the creative ability of gummint bureaucrats > to extract money from public sheeple. > > Being ID-less will NEVER be tolerated. Every citizen MUST be given a > number at birth that tracks their every move until they die. If the > "driver's license" story doesn't sell then a new one will be invented. > > As for drunk drivers, we've already crossed that hurdle where being > drunk as a passenger or having booze in the car is taken as being the > same as drunk driving. Even better with computer-controlled slave > population you can rig it so that say the car passenger doesn't put > their seatbelt on. The computer notices, informs the authorities, writes > a ticket and withdraws the fine and court costs from your bank account > while you are still riding in the car. That should make driving safer > for everyone. If just one life is saved, it's worth it! agree, but I think the driverless car should gently eject the drunk passenger, or take him to jail. As the Drunk could get further injured after being delivered to his destination, perhaps his home, where he then beats up the wife, can't be part of that. Could a determined drunk, or passenger make the driverless car run over someone ? Idea would be that passenger flees the scene, leaving the driverless car at fault. This says the driverless car must have full ID of the passenger, and facial recognition, and lock to trap the tampering individual, set alarm until police come. Could an accident be staged w a driverless car to collect insurance ?
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Driverless cars will change the way we think of car ownership Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-07 08:48 -0600
Re: Driverless cars will change the way we think of car ownership Edgardo Alcantara <edgardoalcantara@carosseryrepair.org> - 2015-11-07 14:51 +0000
Climate trolling militants attacking sci.physics with driverless cars 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2015-11-07 14:55 +0000
Re: Driverless cars will change the way we think of car ownership gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-07 09:26 -0600
Re: Driverless cars will change the way we think of car ownership Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-11-07 10:59 -0800
Re: Driverless cars will change the way we think of car ownership benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-07 14:29 -0500
Re: Driverless cars will change the way we think of car ownership Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-11-08 14:18 -0800
Re: Driverless cars will change the way we think of car ownership gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-09 12:59 -0600
Re: Driverless cars will change the way we think of car ownership jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-09 19:56 +0000
Re: Driverless cars will change the way we think of car ownership gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-09 16:24 -0600
Re: Driverless cars will change the way we think of car ownership jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-09 22:55 +0000
Re: Driverless cars will change the way we think of car ownership Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-11-09 15:09 -0800
Re: Driverless cars will change the way we think of car ownership gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-09 20:29 -0600
Re: Driverless cars will change the way we think of car ownership jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-07 18:55 +0000
csiph-web