Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #329986

Re: Why Linux is a success.

From Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: Why Linux is a success.
Date 2015-10-31 17:07 -0400
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <n13aeo$49t$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (14 earlier) <k7hdgc-6s2.ln1@spanky.localhost.net> <cd810fc2-94aa-45c7-a148-bc291b0e3acc@googlegroups.com> <hmefgc-gj8.ln1@spanky.localhost.net> <d9ki50Fr46lU3@mid.individual.net> <n136bl$glh$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

On 2015-10-31 3:57 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
> Lloyd Parsons wrote:
> 
>> On Sat, 31 Oct 2015 11:42:57 -0700, Kelsey Bjarnason wrote:
>>
>>> [snips]
>>>
>>> On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 19:48:52 -0700, -hh wrote:
>>>
>>>> Kelsey B writes:
>>>
>>>>>> Absolutely!  Couple that with the fact it will also work with any of
>>>>>> the printers and scanners that store is selling too.  Well, actually
>>>>>> any printer/scanner that anyone is selling.
>>>>>
>>>>> Note the implicit kowtowing to the corporate master here.  No mention
>>>>> of *existing* hardware, just hardware *for sale*.
>>>>
>>>> Existing hardware had to have had come from somewhere at some point.
>>>
>>> Yes, and?
>>>
>>>> Well, putting your claims to practice, feel free to tell us what
>>>> hardware you're running, since it obviously has never broken down or
>>>> had had any other reason to ever have paid money to have been replaced.
>>>
>>> What the thundering fuck are you blabbering about?  Are you delusional
>>> enough to consider the user _choosing_ to upgrade his hardware, and the
>>> user being _forced_ to upgrade it because some corporate jackass both
>>> controls the driver and refuses to update it, as being equivalent?
>>>
>>> You really *are* a slave of the corporate masters, aren't you?  Do they
>>> allow you *any* free will?
>>
>> You are an idiot.  Drivers will be updated for Windows first and all
>> others after that.  That assumes that they think there are enough of
>> whatever is out there to make it worthwhile.
>>
> 
> Interesting idiocy you show here.
> 
> Drivers for *existing* hardware are all too often *not* updated. 
> Meaning you can't use the otherwise fine working peripheral anymore.

Exactly. It's something I absolutely detest about Windows in general. If
there is no reason to upgrade a printer or a scanner which might be
slower than the newest model but still fine, I would rather not. I
understand that people were forced to do such a thing during the days
when each computer was proprietary and printers, scanners or whatever
else were made specifically for that one computer, but those days have
long past. If people with means choose to hold onto their old car even
though it's butt-ugly just because it still works fine, I don't see why
I can't hold onto my old scanner.

Printers seem to get updated drivers, but scanners don't. This area is a
major win for Linux and OS X (apparently).

-- 
Charmed Tuna

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Why Linux is a failure. Edward Milano <milano58_remove_no_spam@post.com> - 2015-09-12 00:27 +0000
  Re: Why my trolling is a failure. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-09-11 21:36 -0400
    Re: Why Chris Ahlstrom is a follower not a leader. Edward Milano <milano58_remove_no_spam@post.com> - 2015-09-12 01:42 +0000
      Re: Why Chris Ahlstrom is a follower not a leader. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-12 12:07 +0200
      Re: Why Chris Ahlstrom is a follower not a leader. "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-12 09:29 -0400
      Re: Why Chris Ahlstrom is a follower not a leader. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-15 16:09 -0500
    Re: Why my trolling is a failure. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-09-12 03:58 +0200
      Re: Why my trolling is a failure. scooz <scooz@myemailisspamfree.net> - 2015-09-11 22:22 -0400
        Re: Why my trolling is a failure. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-11 21:01 -0700
          Re: Why my trolling is a failure. scooz <scooz@myemailisspamfree.net> - 2015-09-12 00:16 -0400
        Re: Why my trolling is a failure. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-15 07:01 -0500
          Re: Why my trolling is a failure. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-15 10:00 -0700
          PLOOPP!!!  SPLASH!!!  AAAAHHHHHHH!!!!  FLUSH!!!! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-15 14:48 -0600
      Re: Why my trolling is a failure. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-09-12 07:06 -0400
        Re: Why my trolling is a failure. sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2015-09-12 08:36 -0300
        Re: Why my trolling is a failure. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 13:57 -0600
      Re: Why my trolling is a failure. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 13:56 -0600
    Re: Why my trolling is a failure. William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-09-12 13:42 +0100
      Re: Why my trolling is a failure. Edward Milano <milano58_remove_no_spam@post.com> - 2015-09-12 14:39 +0000
    Re: Why Linux is a failure. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-12 11:23 -0400
      Re: Why Linux is a failure. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 15:51 +0000
    Re: Why my trolling is a failure. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 13:55 -0600
      Re: Why my trolling is a failure. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 20:59 +0100
        Re: Why my trolling is a failure. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-09-12 16:56 -0400
          Re: Why my trolling is a failure. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 22:26 +0000
            Re: Why my trolling is a failure. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 21:05 -0600
          Re: Why my trolling is a failure. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 21:04 -0600
          Re: Why my trolling is a failure. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-15 07:06 -0500
            Find one for sale in the stores, Turdv.  Linux left the shelf years ago. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-15 14:49 -0600
        Re: Why my trolling is a failure. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 21:03 -0600
          Re: Why my trolling is a failure. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 06:09 +0100
            Re: Why my trolling is a failure. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-13 11:50 -0600
  Re: Why Linux is a failure. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 05:39 +0100
    Re: Why Linux is a failure. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-11 22:14 -0700
  Re: Why Linux is a failure. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-12 12:05 +0200
  Today's topic is:  Why is Edward Milano such a Pultz? John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 04:30 -0700
    Re: Today's topic is:  Why is Edward Milano such a Pultz? "Dr. John Grubor" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 15:21 +0000
  Re: Why this troll is a failure. William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-09-12 13:39 +0100
    Re: Why this troll is a failure. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 14:00 -0600
      Re: Why this troll is a failure. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 21:04 +0100
        Re: Why this troll is a failure. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 21:05 -0600
          Re: Why this troll is a failure. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 05:19 +0100
            Re: Why this troll is a failure. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-13 11:50 -0600
              Re: Why this troll is a failure. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 13:18 -0500
                Re: Why this troll is a failure. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-14 13:08 -0600
  Re: Why Linux is a failure. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-15 06:55 -0500
    Typical Turdv response.  A total LUSER! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-15 14:49 -0600
  Re: Why Linux is a failure. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-15 16:08 -0500
    Re: Why Linux is a failure. Edward Milano <milano58_remove_no_spam@post.com> - 2015-09-15 21:48 +0000
      Re: Why Linux is a failure. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-16 15:20 -0500
        Re: Why Linux is a failure. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-09-16 17:04 -0400
          Re: Why Linux is a failure. William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-09-16 23:03 +0100
        Re: Why Linux is a success. ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-09-16 23:24 +0000
          Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2015-09-16 18:33 -0500
          Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-16 17:23 -0700
          Re: Why Linux is a success. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-09-17 03:42 -0700
            Re: Why Linux is a success. sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2015-09-17 08:39 -0300
              Re: Why Linux is a success. ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 12:33 +0000
                Re: Why Linux is a success. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-09-17 06:02 -0700
              Re: Why Linux is a success. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-18 08:06 -0500
                Re: Why Linux is a success. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-18 08:54 -0500
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 15:24 +0000
                Re: Why Linux is a success. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-18 12:00 -0400
                Re: Why Linux is a success. "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-18 12:52 -0400
                Re: Why Linux is a success. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-20 13:03 -0400
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-20 19:17 +0200
                Re: Why Linux is a success. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-20 14:10 -0400
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-20 21:06 +0200
                Re: Why Linux is a success. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-21 07:25 -0500
                Re: Why Linux is a success. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-21 09:30 -0400
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-24 08:21 -0500
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-24 13:25 +0000
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-24 09:47 -0400
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-24 14:28 +0000
                Re: Why Linux is a success. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-24 11:08 -0500
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-24 16:36 +0000
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-24 11:57 -0500
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-24 17:06 +0000
                Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-24 19:07 -0600
                Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-24 19:06 -0600
                Re: Why Linux is a success. ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-25 17:00 +0000
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-25 17:22 +0000
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 10:41 -0700
                Re: Why Linux is a success. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-26 12:48 -0500
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 18:06 +0000
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 18:11 -0700
                Re: Why Linux is a success. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-02 07:21 -0600
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 14:05 +0000
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 09:52 -0500
                Re: Why Linux is a success. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-26 07:35 -0500
                Re: Why Linux is a success. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-26 08:42 -0400
                Re: Why Linux is a success. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-26 09:00 -0500
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 14:03 +0000
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 18:13 -0700
                Re: Why Linux is a success. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-10-30 19:48 -0700
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 11:42 -0700
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 19:12 +0000
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 20:57 +0100
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 20:10 +0000
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 21:23 +0100
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 20:40 +0000
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 23:37 +0100
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 23:13 +0000
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-01 01:41 +0100
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 00:43 +0000
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-01 01:45 +0100
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-31 17:52 -0700
                Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-31 19:47 -0600
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-31 21:37 -0700
                Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-31 19:46 -0600
                Re: Why Linux is a success. ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 01:59 +0000
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 14:09 -0500
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 12:12 -0700
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-31 17:54 -0700
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 14:08 -0500
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-31 17:53 -0700
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-01 02:04 +0100
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-31 18:17 -0700
                Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-31 19:45 -0600
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-31 21:39 -0700
                Re: Why Linux is a success. ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 01:57 +0000
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-31 20:37 -0700
                Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-01 14:22 -0700
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 14:07 -0500
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 12:13 -0700
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-01 20:47 +0100
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 15:15 -0500
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 13:42 -0700
                Re: Why Linux is a success. William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-11-01 22:37 +0000
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-01 17:42 -0500
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-02 00:14 +0100
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-01 18:18 -0500
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-02 00:29 +0100
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-01 18:33 -0500
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-02 00:37 +0100
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-01 18:39 -0500
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-02 00:58 +0100
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 16:59 -0700
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 16:50 -0700
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 20:15 -0500
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 18:35 -0700
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-02 07:56 +0100
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 09:47 -0500
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-02 18:21 +0100
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 12:46 -0500
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 18:42 -0500
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-03 00:58 +0100
                You're a liar. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-03 16:15 -0700
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 16:50 -0700
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 20:12 -0500
                Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-01 18:58 -0700
                Re: Why Linux is a success. William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-11-02 00:09 +0000
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 20:18 -0500
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 18:34 -0700
                No it doesn't, moron.  You are a liar. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-01 18:59 -0700
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 20:11 -0500
                Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-01 18:58 -0700
                Re: Why Linux is a success. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-02 09:52 -0600
                Go lick your urinals, dog. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-01 18:57 -0700
                Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-31 19:43 -0600
                Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-31 19:42 -0600
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-31 17:07 -0400
                Re: Why Linux is a success. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-10-31 17:20 -0400
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-31 17:28 -0400
                Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-31 19:50 -0600
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 02:31 +0000
                Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-01 14:26 -0700
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 14:14 -0500
                Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-01 14:27 -0700
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 20:02 -0500
                Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-01 19:01 -0700
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 09:40 -0500
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 09:41 -0500
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 14:49 +0000
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 09:57 -0500
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-02 10:38 -0500
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 10:41 -0500
                Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-02 16:07 -0700
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-02 18:16 -0500
                Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-03 16:16 -0700
                Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-31 19:42 -0600
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-01 11:29 +0100
                Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-01 14:28 -0700
                Re: Why Linux is a success. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-02 07:28 -0600
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 14:03 +0000
                Re: Why Linux is a success. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-10-31 18:27 -0700
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-31 10:17 -0400
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-31 08:33 -0700
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-31 12:22 -0400
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-31 17:26 +0100
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-31 12:32 -0400
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-31 09:50 -0700
                Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-31 12:07 -0600
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 11:37 -0700
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 19:14 +0000
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-31 15:09 -0500
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 20:11 +0000
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 21:24 +0100
                Re: Why Linux is a success. ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 20:35 +0000
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 20:41 +0000
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 20:41 +0000
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 23:43 +0100
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 23:11 +0000
                Re: Why Linux is a success. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-11-05 13:03 -0500
                Re: Why Linux is a success. ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 20:32 +0000
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 20:42 +0000
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-31 12:27 -0400
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-31 09:49 -0700
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 10:12 -0700
                Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-31 12:06 -0600
                Re: Why Linux is a success. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-26 10:26 -0400
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-26 10:38 -0400
                Re: Why Linux is a success. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-26 16:44 -0500
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 15:20 -0700
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 22:28 +0000
                Re: Why Linux is a success. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-10-26 16:15 -0700
                Re: Why Linux is a success. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-26 21:51 -0500
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 20:48 -0700
                Re: Why Linux is a success. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-10-27 04:25 -0700
                Re: Why Linux is a success. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-27 07:15 -0500
                Re: Why Linux is a success. ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 13:37 +0000
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 11:47 -0700
                Re: Why Linux is a success. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-27 10:29 -0400
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 11:49 -0700
                LINUX SUCKS AND SO DO YOU. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-24 19:05 -0600
                Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-21 11:54 -0600
                Re: Why Linux is a success. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-24 08:16 -0500
                Re: Why Linux is a success. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-09-18 09:08 -0700
                Re: Why Linux is a success. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-10-24 20:36 -0700
              Re: Why Linux is a success. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-21 03:39 -0500
                Re: Why Linux is a success. sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2015-09-21 08:38 -0300
    Re: Why Linux is a failure. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 22:03 +0000
    Re: Why Windows is a failure. ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 22:04 +0000
      Re: Why Windows is a failure. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-15 22:13 +0000
        Re: Why Windows is a failure. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-15 15:41 -0700
      Thinking of trying Linux? Better Think again scooz <scooz@myemailisspamfree.net> - 2015-09-15 18:17 -0400
        Re: Thinking of trying Linux? Better Think again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-15 15:26 -0700
        Re: Thinking of trying Linux? Better Think again Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-15 20:54 -0500
          Re: Thinking of trying Linux? Better Think again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-16 06:57 -0500
            Re: Thinking of trying Linux? Better Think again JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-16 15:23 -0500
        Re: Thinking of trying Linux? Better Think again JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-16 15:22 -0500
      Re: Why Windows is a failure. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-15 15:21 -0700
      Re: Why Windows is a failure. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 22:26 +0000
      Re: Why Windows is a failure. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-15 20:56 -0500
        Re: Why Windows is a failure. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-16 09:41 -0400
          Re: Why Windows is a failure. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-17 00:00 -0500
            Re: Why Windows is a failure. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-17 08:13 -0400
            Re: Why Windows is a failure. ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 12:31 +0000
              Re: Why Windows is a failure. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-17 19:31 -0500
                Re: Why Windows is a failure. ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:30 +0000
    Re: Why Linux is a failure. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-15 15:22 -0700

csiph-web