Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #330001
| From | Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: Why Linux is a success. |
| Date | 2015-10-31 23:11 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <d9l05dF67aU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (21 earlier) <n13753$h1d$1@news.albasani.net> <d9klkfFs39fU2@mid.individual.net> <n137to$oom$2@dont-email.me> <d9knbmFshg0U2@mid.individual.net> <n13g32$rj7$1@dont-email.me> |
On Sat, 31 Oct 2015 23:43:49 +0100, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > Lloyd Parsons wrote: > >> On Sat, 31 Oct 2015 21:24:29 +0100, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >> >>> Lloyd Parsons wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, 31 Oct 2015 15:09:08 -0500, Nobody wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 10/31/2015 1:37 PM, Kelsey Bjarnason wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 31 Oct 2015 17:26:16 +0100, Melzzzzz wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, 31 Oct 2015 12:22:22 -0400 Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There you go, a decent reason to use OS X: whatever hardware you >>>>>>>> buy is supported and for a longer period of time. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Linux is better in this regard... >>>>>> >>>>>> *Vastly* better. >>>>>> >>>>>> In LGX, there are basically two reasons a driver for a piece of >>>>>> hardware will stop being offered: >>>>>> >>>>>> 1) There *are no more* of the physical devices. >>>>>> 2) The driver was so abstruse it is beyond updating. >>>>>> >>>>>> 2 is rare. So is 1, for that matter. In Windows-land, it's far >>>>>> from rare to have a piece of hardware become abandonware simply >>>>>> because the vendor would much prefer you buy a new device than >>>>>> spend a seconds' effort to update the device driver for it. >>>>> >>>>> Lack of drivers has kept many users, especially businesses, on >>>>> WinXP. >>>> >>>> Refining 'many' as to mean 'a few' and you might be right. But I'd >>>> say a business still running on WinXP isn't much of a business. >>>> >>>> >>> You would be surprised >> >> >> Not at all. There are as many idiots in business as there are in the >> general public. Run a business on a completely non-supported OS? Pure >> idiocy! > > No. There are *lots* of instances where businesses need special > peripherals which did not get new drivers for newer windows versions > They hang on to their XP setups, and since it is no longer supported > they can even safely configure it away from internet access. > Sure. But those same machines are purporsed just for that. They aren't used in the general business. > I would say a XP setup which can only access internal network nodes and > without direct access to the outside is much safer than a current > Win10.. > If both the W10 and XP couldn't access the outside they would both be equally safe. What in the world would make you say otherwise. > Just make certain that it can not get outside and also can't be > connected to from there > > I tell you a little secret: A *lot* of ATM machines run on WinXP Assuming that's correct, I doubt you'd recognize the WinXP they use as compared to what runs on the desktop. -- Lloyd
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why Linux is a failure. Edward Milano <milano58_remove_no_spam@post.com> - 2015-09-12 00:27 +0000
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-09-11 21:36 -0400
Re: Why Chris Ahlstrom is a follower not a leader. Edward Milano <milano58_remove_no_spam@post.com> - 2015-09-12 01:42 +0000
Re: Why Chris Ahlstrom is a follower not a leader. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-12 12:07 +0200
Re: Why Chris Ahlstrom is a follower not a leader. "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-12 09:29 -0400
Re: Why Chris Ahlstrom is a follower not a leader. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-15 16:09 -0500
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-09-12 03:58 +0200
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. scooz <scooz@myemailisspamfree.net> - 2015-09-11 22:22 -0400
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-11 21:01 -0700
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. scooz <scooz@myemailisspamfree.net> - 2015-09-12 00:16 -0400
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-15 07:01 -0500
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-15 10:00 -0700
PLOOPP!!! SPLASH!!! AAAAHHHHHHH!!!! FLUSH!!!! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-15 14:48 -0600
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-09-12 07:06 -0400
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2015-09-12 08:36 -0300
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 13:57 -0600
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 13:56 -0600
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-09-12 13:42 +0100
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. Edward Milano <milano58_remove_no_spam@post.com> - 2015-09-12 14:39 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a failure. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-12 11:23 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a failure. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 15:51 +0000
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 13:55 -0600
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 20:59 +0100
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-09-12 16:56 -0400
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 22:26 +0000
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 21:05 -0600
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 21:04 -0600
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-15 07:06 -0500
Find one for sale in the stores, Turdv. Linux left the shelf years ago. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-15 14:49 -0600
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 21:03 -0600
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 06:09 +0100
Re: Why my trolling is a failure. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-13 11:50 -0600
Re: Why Linux is a failure. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 05:39 +0100
Re: Why Linux is a failure. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-11 22:14 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a failure. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-12 12:05 +0200
Today's topic is: Why is Edward Milano such a Pultz? John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-09-12 04:30 -0700
Re: Today's topic is: Why is Edward Milano such a Pultz? "Dr. John Grubor" <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-12 15:21 +0000
Re: Why this troll is a failure. William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-09-12 13:39 +0100
Re: Why this troll is a failure. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 14:00 -0600
Re: Why this troll is a failure. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-12 21:04 +0100
Re: Why this troll is a failure. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-12 21:05 -0600
Re: Why this troll is a failure. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 05:19 +0100
Re: Why this troll is a failure. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-13 11:50 -0600
Re: Why this troll is a failure. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-13 13:18 -0500
Re: Why this troll is a failure. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-14 13:08 -0600
Re: Why Linux is a failure. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-15 06:55 -0500
Typical Turdv response. A total LUSER! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-15 14:49 -0600
Re: Why Linux is a failure. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-15 16:08 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a failure. Edward Milano <milano58_remove_no_spam@post.com> - 2015-09-15 21:48 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a failure. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-16 15:20 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a failure. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-09-16 17:04 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a failure. William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-09-16 23:03 +0100
Re: Why Linux is a success. ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-09-16 23:24 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2015-09-16 18:33 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-16 17:23 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-09-17 03:42 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2015-09-17 08:39 -0300
Re: Why Linux is a success. ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 12:33 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-09-17 06:02 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-18 08:06 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-18 08:54 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 15:24 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-18 12:00 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. "A.M" <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-09-18 12:52 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-20 13:03 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-20 19:17 +0200
Re: Why Linux is a success. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-20 14:10 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-09-20 21:06 +0200
Re: Why Linux is a success. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-21 07:25 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-21 09:30 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-24 08:21 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-24 13:25 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-24 09:47 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-24 14:28 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-24 11:08 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-24 16:36 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-24 11:57 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-24 17:06 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-24 19:07 -0600
Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-24 19:06 -0600
Re: Why Linux is a success. ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-25 17:00 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-25 17:22 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 10:41 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-26 12:48 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 18:06 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 18:11 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-02 07:21 -0600
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 14:05 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 09:52 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-26 07:35 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-26 08:42 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-26 09:00 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 14:03 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 18:13 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-10-30 19:48 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 11:42 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 19:12 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 20:57 +0100
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 20:10 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 21:23 +0100
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 20:40 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 23:37 +0100
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 23:13 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-01 01:41 +0100
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 00:43 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-01 01:45 +0100
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-31 17:52 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-31 19:47 -0600
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-31 21:37 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-31 19:46 -0600
Re: Why Linux is a success. ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 01:59 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 14:09 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 12:12 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-31 17:54 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 14:08 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-31 17:53 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-01 02:04 +0100
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-31 18:17 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-31 19:45 -0600
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-31 21:39 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 01:57 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-31 20:37 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-01 14:22 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 14:07 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 12:13 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-01 20:47 +0100
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 15:15 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 13:42 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-11-01 22:37 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-01 17:42 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-02 00:14 +0100
Re: Why Linux is a success. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-01 18:18 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-02 00:29 +0100
Re: Why Linux is a success. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-01 18:33 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-02 00:37 +0100
Re: Why Linux is a success. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-01 18:39 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-02 00:58 +0100
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 16:59 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 16:50 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 20:15 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 18:35 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-02 07:56 +0100
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 09:47 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-02 18:21 +0100
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 12:46 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 18:42 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-03 00:58 +0100
You're a liar. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-03 16:15 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 16:50 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 20:12 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-01 18:58 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-11-02 00:09 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 20:18 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-01 18:34 -0700
No it doesn't, moron. You are a liar. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-01 18:59 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 20:11 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-01 18:58 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-02 09:52 -0600
Go lick your urinals, dog. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-01 18:57 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-31 19:43 -0600
Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-31 19:42 -0600
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-31 17:07 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-10-31 17:20 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-31 17:28 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-31 19:50 -0600
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 02:31 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-01 14:26 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 14:14 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-01 14:27 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-01 20:02 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-01 19:01 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 09:40 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 09:41 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 14:49 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 09:57 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-02 10:38 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-02 10:41 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-02 16:07 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-02 18:16 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-03 16:16 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-31 19:42 -0600
Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-01 11:29 +0100
Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-01 14:28 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-02 07:28 -0600
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 14:03 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-10-31 18:27 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-31 10:17 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-31 08:33 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-31 12:22 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-10-31 17:26 +0100
Re: Why Linux is a success. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-31 12:32 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-31 09:50 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-31 12:07 -0600
Re: Why Linux is a success. Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 11:37 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 19:14 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-31 15:09 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 20:11 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 21:24 +0100
Re: Why Linux is a success. ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 20:35 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 20:41 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 20:41 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-31 23:43 +0100
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 23:11 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-11-05 13:03 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 20:32 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 20:42 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-31 12:27 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-31 09:49 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 10:12 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-31 12:06 -0600
Re: Why Linux is a success. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-26 10:26 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-26 10:38 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-26 16:44 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 15:20 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 22:28 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-10-26 16:15 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-10-26 21:51 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 20:48 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-10-27 04:25 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-27 07:15 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 13:37 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 11:47 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-27 10:29 -0400
Re: Why Linux is a success. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-27 11:49 -0700
LINUX SUCKS AND SO DO YOU. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-10-24 19:05 -0600
Re: Why Linux is a success. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-09-21 11:54 -0600
Re: Why Linux is a success. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-24 08:16 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-09-18 09:08 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-10-24 20:36 -0700
Re: Why Linux is a success. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-21 03:39 -0500
Re: Why Linux is a success. sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2015-09-21 08:38 -0300
Re: Why Linux is a failure. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 22:03 +0000
Re: Why Windows is a failure. ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 22:04 +0000
Re: Why Windows is a failure. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-09-15 22:13 +0000
Re: Why Windows is a failure. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-15 15:41 -0700
Thinking of trying Linux? Better Think again scooz <scooz@myemailisspamfree.net> - 2015-09-15 18:17 -0400
Re: Thinking of trying Linux? Better Think again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-15 15:26 -0700
Re: Thinking of trying Linux? Better Think again Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-15 20:54 -0500
Re: Thinking of trying Linux? Better Think again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-09-16 06:57 -0500
Re: Thinking of trying Linux? Better Think again JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-16 15:23 -0500
Re: Thinking of trying Linux? Better Think again JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-09-16 15:22 -0500
Re: Why Windows is a failure. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-15 15:21 -0700
Re: Why Windows is a failure. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 22:26 +0000
Re: Why Windows is a failure. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-15 20:56 -0500
Re: Why Windows is a failure. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-16 09:41 -0400
Re: Why Windows is a failure. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-17 00:00 -0500
Re: Why Windows is a failure. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-09-17 08:13 -0400
Re: Why Windows is a failure. ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 12:31 +0000
Re: Why Windows is a failure. Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-09-17 19:31 -0500
Re: Why Windows is a failure. ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:30 +0000
Re: Why Linux is a failure. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-09-15 15:22 -0700
csiph-web