Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage

From	glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c
Subject	Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage
Date	2015-10-26 02:24 +0000
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<n0k2te$gqa$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(10 earlier) <n0e35h$5ii$1@dont-email.me> <n0fkb6$anv$1@speranza.aioe.org> <562BB423.7020707@verizon.net> <n0hv0e$u3$1@speranza.aioe.org> <562CEE47.9090209@verizon.net>

Show all headers | View raw

James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> wrote:

(snip)
(I wrote)

>> But you still need a way to indicate line ends.

> Well, yes, that's implied by my statement "This requires that you 
> do the end-of-line marking yourself". Your point is?

>>> So LRECL is, in fact, the conventional approach on OS/360 for indicating
>>> where the end of a line is? I asked you before, but you never identified
>>> what the conventional approach is.

> [snip a lot of words that make it clear that LRECL isn't the relevant
> mechanism, without bothering to identify how line lengths are
> conventionally kept track of on such a system]

> I know that on some systems, when working on files with fixed record
> sizes, the end of a line is indicated by the fact that the parts of the
> block that are after the end of the line are padded with blank or null
> characters - which is why the standard doesn't guarantee that blanks
> written at the end of a line will be there when the line is read back
> in. All such blanks can be dropped on input, whether they were the
> result of explicit output or just padding. Is something like that
> approach used?

Theoretically FB (fixed record length) just gives you some number
of characters to fill up, but yes usually lines are padded with
blanks for text files. It is convenient for punched cards where
no holes punched is blank (X'40'). 

FB files with LRECL=80 are often called "card image" as it is
byte for byte what you get copying cards to disk (or tape).

But OS/360 object programs are also FB and LRECL=80. Unused columns
are blank filled, but not padded.  Interestingly, one field in the
END card of an object program holds the start address if specified,
or blanks if not. Seems programs can't have X'404040' as their start
address.

> If you do in fact have any idea how line lengths are conventionally
> determined on this platform, please explain. If you don't know, say so.
> And please use the term "line length" or "end of line" in your response
> so that it's clear that you are actually responding to my request,
> rather than merely doing another info dump.

As above for FB, blank padded to a specified LRECL. 

For VB, no padding is needed, each line (record) has a record 
descriptor with a two byte length (in four bytes). LRECL gives
the maximum line length including the RDW. The maximum BLKSIZE
is 32760, so maximum LRECL is 32756, leaving 32752 characters
of text per line (record).

(snip)

>> As far as I understand it, with System.out.println() and 
>> System.out.format("%n"); a line boundary can be created without

> So, do you have any reason to believe that fputc('\n') to a text file
> would fail to produce exactly the same kind of line boundary? If so,
> what it that reason?

Yes, I believe it would. But Java System.out.print("\n"); does
not have to generate a line boundary.  (Besides the fact that
char in Java is 16 bits.)

> And, while I hate to have to repeat myself, but you've repeatedly
> avoided answering this question: how would that line boundary 
> be indicated?

For OS/360 itself, there is nothing like fputc(). For I/O devices
like card readers, printers, disks, and tape, the smallest I/O
operation is a block or record. Terminal input is also buffered
externally from the processor such that whole lines are read
or written at once. (For output, the system doesn't really care,
but for input you normally don't get an interrupt until the
appropriate terminal line-end character is seen.)

I suppose in unix terms, there are block I/O devices, but not
character devices. You can write a disk file with LRECL=1,
and for that matter BLKSIZE=1, though. (In reading tapes, a block
less than 12 bytes with an error is treated as noise.)
Disks and tapes have interblock gaps, so you don't want to do that.

Oh, direct access files are RECFM=F (not blocked). Each read or
write maps directly to a disk block. As above, you can set LRECL
to any size you want, from 1 to the track size on the disk.
Data is read/written directly to your buffer. 

Spooled I/O (SYSIN, the usual DDNAME for what unix calls stdin,
and SYSPRINT for what unix calls stdout) are usually buffered
and reblocked by the system, at least on larger machines. 

-- glen

Thread

C struct syntax allowance by usage "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-16 13:29 -0700
  Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-16 13:47 -0700
    Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-16 14:12 -0700
  Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-10-16 22:15 +0100
    Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-16 14:38 -0700
      Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-10-17 10:32 +0100
        Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-17 05:26 -0700
          Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-10-17 14:17 +0100
            Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-17 06:48 -0700
              Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-10-17 19:01 +0100
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-17 11:17 -0700
    Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-16 15:28 -0700
      Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-10-17 01:41 +0100
        Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-16 18:23 -0700
      Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-10-18 11:04 +0200
  Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-17 10:31 +1300
    Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-16 14:38 -0700
      Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-17 11:14 +1300
        Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-16 15:25 -0700
          Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-17 11:31 +1300
            Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-16 15:38 -0700
              Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-17 12:32 +1300
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-10-18 11:35 +0200
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-10-18 11:16 +0100
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-10-18 13:40 +0200
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-10-18 17:35 +0100
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-18 10:52 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-18 11:02 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-10-18 19:59 +0100
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-18 12:15 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-10-18 21:41 +0100
                Likeliehood of RDC/SeaAlive implementation (Was: C struct syntax allowance by usage) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2015-10-19 08:23 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2015-10-18 14:02 -0400
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2015-10-18 14:19 -0400
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-10-18 21:13 +0100
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-10-18 20:37 +0200
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-10-18 20:27 +0100
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-10-18 23:14 +0200
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage asetofsymbols@gmail.com - 2015-10-18 15:09 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-18 16:11 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-19 07:57 +1300
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-10-18 20:11 +0100
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-19 09:19 +1300
          Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-10-18 11:19 +0200
            Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-18 03:08 -0700
              Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-10-18 13:52 +0200
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-18 05:39 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-10-18 14:57 +0200
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-19 10:31 +1300
              Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-10-18 15:49 +0100
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-18 16:53 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-10-19 01:50 +0100
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-19 02:28 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-10-19 12:38 +0200
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-10-19 12:09 +0100
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-10-19 14:26 +0200
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-10-19 13:34 +0100
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-20 02:36 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-19 05:09 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-10-19 14:41 +0200
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-19 06:08 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-10-19 15:20 +0200
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-19 08:24 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-20 08:43 +1300
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-19 13:00 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2015-10-19 20:34 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-20 09:47 +1300
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-19 16:32 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2015-10-20 10:37 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-19 21:24 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2015-10-20 13:49 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-20 07:33 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-20 15:53 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-20 10:37 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-21 05:05 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-21 02:02 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-21 06:07 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-10-21 14:15 +0100
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-21 09:23 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-10-21 18:30 +0100
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-21 12:13 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-10-21 21:17 +0100
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-21 14:21 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-21 14:55 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-21 15:45 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-10-22 14:33 +0200
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-22 08:54 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-10-23 15:59 +0200
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-23 15:03 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2015-10-24 10:37 -0400
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-10-21 23:26 +0100
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-21 15:56 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-22 05:19 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-10-22 11:08 +0100
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-10-22 14:58 +0200
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-10-22 14:06 +0200
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-22 07:41 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-10-22 14:00 +0100
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2015-10-22 21:00 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-22 14:57 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2015-10-21 14:41 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-21 13:01 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-21 13:25 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2015-10-22 07:44 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2015-10-21 13:41 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-22 05:22 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-22 01:01 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2015-10-22 08:00 -0500
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-10-21 09:49 -0400
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2015-10-21 13:20 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-20 15:40 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-10-20 11:55 -0400
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-20 10:34 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-21 05:20 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-21 05:11 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-10-21 09:47 -0400
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-22 05:32 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-10-22 10:08 -0400
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-22 21:45 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-10-22 19:09 -0400
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-10-22 19:22 -0400
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-22 17:49 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2015-10-22 21:13 -0400
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-23 11:36 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-22 20:18 -0500
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-23 11:55 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-23 11:14 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-23 09:09 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-24 09:31 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-11-10 15:17 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-11-10 10:39 -0800
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 11:02 -0800
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-10-23 15:54 -0400
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-23 13:51 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-10-23 17:41 -0400
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-11-10 15:32 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-23 15:17 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-23 16:34 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-24 09:51 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2015-10-24 10:01 -0400
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-10-24 12:38 -0400
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-24 13:56 -0500
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-10-24 15:17 -0400
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-25 13:47 -0500
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-25 23:46 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-25 07:05 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-10-25 10:59 -0400
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-26 02:24 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-25 11:13 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-26 02:58 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-24 11:02 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Sjouke Burry <burrynulnulfour@ppllaanneett.nnll> - 2015-10-24 20:13 +0200
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-24 12:45 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-24 10:30 +1300
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-10-19 12:05 +0100
  Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-16 15:57 -0700
    Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-10-17 00:54 +0100
      Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-16 17:19 -0700
      Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-17 15:33 +1300
        Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-16 19:41 -0700
          Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-17 15:58 +1300
            Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-16 20:10 -0700
              Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-17 16:49 +1300
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-16 20:59 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-10-18 11:32 +0200
          Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2015-10-16 23:15 -0400
            Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-16 20:34 -0700
              Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-16 20:45 -0700

csiph-web