Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #73570

Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage

From glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage
Date 2015-10-22 21:45 +0000
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <n0bldg$jte$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References (7 earlier) <n05o12$7rl$1@dont-email.me> <n076qj$j9r$1@speranza.aioe.org> <n084t0$7vl$1@dont-email.me> <n09se3$dfe$1@speranza.aioe.org> <n0aqhc$6cg$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> wrote:
> On 10/22/2015 01:32 AM, glen herrmannsfeldt wrote:
>> James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> wrote:
 
> I just noticed that you routinely snip all attributions from quoted
> text, leaving only your own attribution of the person you responded to.
> If you decide to retain text that was written by someone, you're
> supposed to also retain the quoted attribution lines that identify that
> text as having been written by that person.

I might try to do more snipping than some others.

Often, I try to post such that the only quoted text is from the
previous post. Sometimes I find that there is other context that
could be useful, but that I have already snipped the attribution.
 
> I'm reinstating a little of the context that you clipped, which is
> relevant to my response:
 
>>>> James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> wrote:
>>>>> ? That's precisely what '\n' does in C and C++.
> ...
>>>> Only if you don't want any actual '\n' in your file, on
>>>> file systems that allow them, or
  
>>> I can't make sense of that response. Perhaps you got the wording
>>> reversed? In C and C++, outputting a '\n' to a text stream will put an
>>> '\n' in your file, on file systems that allow them. On the other hand,
>>> if you

> The relevance of your response about Fortran escapes me. Are you still
> asserting that you should use '\n' in C or C++ output only when "you
> don't want any actual '\n' in your file, on file systems that allow
> them"? It would make a whole lot more sense to me if you replaced "Only"
> with "Not", reversing the entire meaning of that sentence.

It more has to do with the OS/360 file system than Fortran, but there
were no C compilers for OS/360 at the time, and maybe still aren't.

OS/360 does not reserver an "end of line" character. CR, NL, and LF
are all valid characters in a text file, and I could even use then
inside character constants in Fortran.  I suppose I could have used
them in C, if I had a C compiler.
 
> ...
>>> In C and C++, if you output '\n' to a text stream, the result in the
>>> output file will be whatever method is used on that platform for
>>> indicating the end of a line. That strikes me as a very good match to
>>> "the system-dependent end of line marker". I know little about java; if
>>> there's something more to "%n" than that description, maybe there's a
>>> difference, but that description alone provides no evidence of the
>>> difference.

On systems with CHAR_BIT 256, there is no way in C to write 256
different characters inside a line, even when no character is used
by the system for an end of line marker.
 
> So, in that regard, it's similar in effect to System.out.format("\n") in
> Java, or printf("\n") in C/C++ - right?

My understanding is that on DOS/Windows systems that

System.out.println(); and System.out.format("%n"); 

write "\r\n" to the file, where

System.out.print("\n"); and System.out.format("\n"); write
just the "\n";   I haven't tested it to be sure.
 
> The question mark at the end of that sentence indicates that the
> sentence is a question. It happens to be one with a "Yes" or "No"
> answer, though as always it is permissible to respond with an
> explanation of why "Yes" or "No" is too limited a range of options,
> combined with the actual answer. I mention this, though it should be
> obvious, because you failed to choose any one of those three options
> when making a non-responsive response to my last question.

-- glen

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

C struct syntax allowance by usage "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-16 13:29 -0700
  Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-16 13:47 -0700
    Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-16 14:12 -0700
  Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-10-16 22:15 +0100
    Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-16 14:38 -0700
      Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-10-17 10:32 +0100
        Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-17 05:26 -0700
          Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-10-17 14:17 +0100
            Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-17 06:48 -0700
              Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-10-17 19:01 +0100
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-17 11:17 -0700
    Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-16 15:28 -0700
      Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-10-17 01:41 +0100
        Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-16 18:23 -0700
      Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-10-18 11:04 +0200
  Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-17 10:31 +1300
    Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-16 14:38 -0700
      Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-17 11:14 +1300
        Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-16 15:25 -0700
          Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-17 11:31 +1300
            Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-16 15:38 -0700
              Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-17 12:32 +1300
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-10-18 11:35 +0200
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-10-18 11:16 +0100
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-10-18 13:40 +0200
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-10-18 17:35 +0100
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-18 10:52 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-18 11:02 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-10-18 19:59 +0100
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-18 12:15 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-10-18 21:41 +0100
                Likeliehood of RDC/SeaAlive implementation (Was: C struct syntax allowance by usage) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2015-10-19 08:23 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2015-10-18 14:02 -0400
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2015-10-18 14:19 -0400
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-10-18 21:13 +0100
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-10-18 20:37 +0200
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-10-18 20:27 +0100
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-10-18 23:14 +0200
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage asetofsymbols@gmail.com - 2015-10-18 15:09 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-18 16:11 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-19 07:57 +1300
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-10-18 20:11 +0100
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-19 09:19 +1300
          Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-10-18 11:19 +0200
            Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-18 03:08 -0700
              Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-10-18 13:52 +0200
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-18 05:39 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-10-18 14:57 +0200
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-19 10:31 +1300
              Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-10-18 15:49 +0100
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-18 16:53 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-10-19 01:50 +0100
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-19 02:28 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-10-19 12:38 +0200
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-10-19 12:09 +0100
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-10-19 14:26 +0200
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-10-19 13:34 +0100
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-20 02:36 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-19 05:09 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-10-19 14:41 +0200
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-19 06:08 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-10-19 15:20 +0200
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-19 08:24 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-20 08:43 +1300
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-19 13:00 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2015-10-19 20:34 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-20 09:47 +1300
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-19 16:32 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2015-10-20 10:37 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-19 21:24 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2015-10-20 13:49 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-20 07:33 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-20 15:53 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-20 10:37 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-21 05:05 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-21 02:02 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-21 06:07 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-10-21 14:15 +0100
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-21 09:23 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-10-21 18:30 +0100
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-21 12:13 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-10-21 21:17 +0100
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-21 14:21 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-21 14:55 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-21 15:45 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-10-22 14:33 +0200
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-22 08:54 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-10-23 15:59 +0200
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-23 15:03 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2015-10-24 10:37 -0400
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-10-21 23:26 +0100
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-21 15:56 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-22 05:19 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-10-22 11:08 +0100
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-10-22 14:58 +0200
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-10-22 14:06 +0200
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-22 07:41 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-10-22 14:00 +0100
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2015-10-22 21:00 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-22 14:57 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2015-10-21 14:41 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-21 13:01 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-21 13:25 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2015-10-22 07:44 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2015-10-21 13:41 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-22 05:22 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-22 01:01 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2015-10-22 08:00 -0500
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-10-21 09:49 -0400
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2015-10-21 13:20 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-20 15:40 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-10-20 11:55 -0400
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-20 10:34 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-21 05:20 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-21 05:11 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-10-21 09:47 -0400
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-22 05:32 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-10-22 10:08 -0400
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-22 21:45 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-10-22 19:09 -0400
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-10-22 19:22 -0400
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-22 17:49 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2015-10-22 21:13 -0400
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-23 11:36 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-22 20:18 -0500
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-23 11:55 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-23 11:14 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-23 09:09 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-24 09:31 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-11-10 15:17 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-11-10 10:39 -0800
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 11:02 -0800
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-10-23 15:54 -0400
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-23 13:51 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-10-23 17:41 -0400
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-11-10 15:32 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-23 15:17 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-23 16:34 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-24 09:51 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2015-10-24 10:01 -0400
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-10-24 12:38 -0400
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-24 13:56 -0500
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-10-24 15:17 -0400
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-25 13:47 -0500
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-25 23:46 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-25 07:05 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-10-25 10:59 -0400
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-26 02:24 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-25 11:13 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-10-26 02:58 +0000
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-10-24 11:02 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Sjouke Burry <burrynulnulfour@ppllaanneett.nnll> - 2015-10-24 20:13 +0200
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-10-24 12:45 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-24 10:30 +1300
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-10-19 12:05 +0100
  Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-16 15:57 -0700
    Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-10-17 00:54 +0100
      Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-16 17:19 -0700
      Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-17 15:33 +1300
        Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-16 19:41 -0700
          Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-17 15:58 +1300
            Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-16 20:10 -0700
              Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-10-17 16:49 +1300
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-16 20:59 -0700
                Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-10-18 11:32 +0200
          Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2015-10-16 23:15 -0400
            Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-16 20:34 -0700
              Re: C struct syntax allowance by usage "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-10-16 20:45 -0700

csiph-web