Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > aus.politics > #759773

Re: LEGAL RIGHT FOR PRESIDENT TO IMPOSE TARIFFS (cf: First Amendment on religion freedom and no tax paid therefore tax can be NATIONAL SECURITY MECHANISM) Honoring our past Presidents

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

WE MIGHT BE ABLE TO RATIONALISE IT AS BEING IN STASIS AND THEREFORE NOT 
SUBJECT TO +3 OFFSET BUT THE EACH NON-TEMPORAL QUADRANT IS ACCESSIBLE 
AND THEREFORE NOT AN ERROR

#413 as [#4, #8, #200, #1, #200] = déō (G1210): {UMBRA: #809 % #41 = 
#30} 1) to bind tie, fasten; 1a) to bind, fasten with chains, to throw 
into chains; 1b) metaph.; 1b1) Satan is said to bind a woman bent 
together by means of a demon, as his messenger, taking possession of the 
woman and preventing her from standing upright; 1b2) to bind, *PUT* 
*UNDER* *OBLIGATION*, *OF* *THE* *LAW*, *DUTY* etc.; i) to be bound to 
one, a wife, a husband; 1b3) to forbid, prohibit, declare to be illicit;	

0947 HRS ON 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 - PROTOTYPE #TWO
[11, 28, 59, 38, 9, 48, 31, 56, 1]

AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY
#369 - HUMAN DISCRIMINATING NORM
#410 - OBLIGATING NORM
#451 - MANIFESTING NORM

getTimeHeuristicGrapple({year: 2001, month: 9, day: 11, hour:9, minute: 
47, deontic: true})

PROTOTYPE #FIVE - DISCRIMINATING NORM
[53, 15, 57, 56, 47, 38, 24, 45, 78]

{@9: Sup: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#339); Ego: 78 - ON THE VERGE: CHIANG (#413)}

TELOS TOTAL: #413
ONTIC TOTAL: #661

#413 as [#4, #8, #200, #1, #200] = déō (G1210): {UMBRA: #809 % #41 = 
#30} 1) to bind tie, fasten; 1a) to bind, fasten with chains, to throw 
into chains; 1b) metaph.; 1b1) Satan is said to bind a woman bent 
together by means of a demon, as his messenger, taking possession of the 
woman and preventing her from standing upright; 1b2) to bind, *PUT* 
*UNDER* *OBLIGATION*, *OF* *THE* *LAW*, *DUTY* etc.; i) to be bound to 
one, a wife, a husband; 1b3) to forbid, prohibit, declare to be illicit;	
	
#986 - MALE TOTAL: #339 as [#600, #1, #30, #5, #80, #70, #200] = 
chalepós (G5467): {UMBRA: #986 % #41 = #2} 1) hard to do, to take, to 
approach; 2) hard to bear, troublesome, dangerous; 2a) harsh, fierce, 
savage;

#2519 - FEME TOTAL: #413 as [#200, #400, #3, #20, #1, #20, #70, #400, 
#600, #5, #800] = synkakouchéō (G4778): {UMBRA: #2519 % #41 = #18} 1) to 
treat ill with another; 2) to be ill treated in company with, share 
persecutions or come into a fellowship of ills;

#677 - ONTIC TOTAL: #661 as [#5, #400, #70, #2, #200] /
#1077 - ONTIC TOTAL: #661 as [#5, #400, #70, #2, #200, #400] = ʻâbar 
(H5674): {UMBRA: #272 % #41 = #26} 1) to pass over or by or through, 
alienate, bring, carry, do away, take, take away, transgress; 1a) (Qal); 
1a1) to pass over, cross, cross over, pass over, march over, overflow, 
go over; 1a2) to pass beyond; 1a3) to pass through, traverse; i) 
passers-through (participle); ii) to pass through (the parts of victim 
in covenant); 1a4) to pass along, pass by, overtake and pass, sweep by; 
i) passer-by (participle); ii) to be past, be over; 1a5) to pass on, go 
on, pass on before, go in advance of, pass along, travel, advance; 1a6) 
to pass away; i) to emigrate, leave (one's territory); ii) to vanish; 
iii) to perish, cease to exist; iv) to become invalid, become obsolete 
(of law, decree); v) to be alienated, pass into other hands; 1a7) 
(Niphal) to be crossed; 1a8) (Piel) to impregnate, cause to cross; 1a9) 
(Hiphil); i) to cause to pass over, cause to bring over, cause to cross 
over, make over to, dedicate, devote; ii) to cause to pass through; iii) 
to cause to pass by or beyond or under, let pass by; iv) to cause to 
pass away, cause to take away; 1a10) (Hithpael) to pass over;

IMMANUEL KANT PROLEGOMENA (1783) COMMENTARY ON MARGIN IDEA: #339: "In 
the first place, the usefulness of a system of categories is here 
revealed so clearly and unmistakably that even if there were no further 
grounds of proof of that system, this alone would sufficiently establish 
their indispensability in the system of pure reason. There are no more 
than four such transcendent ideas, as many as there are classes of 
categories; in each of them, however, they refer only to the absolute 
completeness of the series of conditions for a given conditioned. In 
accordance with these cosmological ideas there are also only four kinds 
of dialectical assertions of pure reason, which show themselves to be 
dialectical because for each such assertion a contradictory one stands 
in opposition in accordance with equally plausible principles of pure 
reason, a conflict that cannot be avoided by any metaphysical art of the 
most subtle distinctions, but that requires the philosopher to return to 
the first sources of pure reason itself. This antinomy, by no means 
arbitrarily contrived, but grounded in the nature of human reason and so 
inevitable and never ending, contains the following four theses together 
with their antitheses." [page 90]

On 2/21/26 15:06, dolf wrote:
> JUST PROVED THAT POINT SINCE THE ZEN offset ought to be +3 WHICH WE'LL 
> NOT RECALCULATE HERE SINCE THIS IS ONLY THE FIRST MENTION OF SUCH
> 
> 2. Good Will, Moral Worth and Duty
> Kant’s analysis of commonsense ideas begins with the thought that the 
> only thing good without qualification is a “good will”. While the 
> phrases “they are good hearted”, “good natured” or “mean well” are 
> common, “the good will” as Kant thinks of it is not the same as any of 
> these common notions. Kant’s idea of a good will is closer to the 
> somewhat archaic idea of a “person of good will”. His use of the term 
> “will” early on in analyzing ordinary moral thought prefigures later and 
> more technical discussions concerning the nature of rational agency. 
> Nevertheless, this idea of a good will is an important commonsense 
> touchstone to which Kant returns throughout his works. The basic idea, 
> as Kant describes it in the Groundwork, is that what makes a person’s 
> will good is that their will is in a certain way governed by whatever 
> basic moral principles there may be. The idea of a good will is the idea 
> of a will committed above all else to making decisions that are morally 
> worthy. This fundamental commitment to morality is something we all 
> highly value, Kant thought. He believes we value it without limitation 
> or qualification. By this he means primarily two things.
> 
> <https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-moral/#GooWilMorWorDut>
> 
> ONE CASE STUDY EXAMPLE DOES NOT PROVE THE THEORY
> 
> 20260221 - The getTimeHeuristicGrapple (chronos) and 
> getDateHeuristicGrapple (chronos) functions now supports an optional 
> chronos property {deontic: true | false} which adjusts the zen +3 of any 
> grapple [] sampling placing into an alternative obligans dialectic
> 
> 0947 HRS ON 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 - PROTOTYPE #TWO
> [11, 28, 59, 38, 9, 48, 31, 56, 1]
> 
> AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY
> #369 - HUMAN DISCRIMINATING NORM
> #410 - OBLIGATING NORM
> #451 - MANIFESTING NORM
> 
> getTimeHeuristicGrapple({year: 2001, month: 9, day: 11, hour:9, minute: 
> 47, deontic: true})
> 
> PROTOTYPE #SIX - OBLIGATING NORM
> [13, 30, 77, 22, 76, 14, 36, 17, 69]
> 
> {@9: Sup: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#379); Ego: 69 - EXHAUSTION: CH'IUNG 
> (#354)}
> 
> TELOS TOTAL: #354
> ONTIC TOTAL: #156
> DEME TOTAL: #156
> 
> #79 - DEME TOTAL: #156 as [#10, #4, #10, #5, #50] = yâd (H3027): {UMBRA: 
> #14 % #41 = #14} 1) hand; 1a) *hand* (of man); 1b) strength, power 
> (fig.); 1c) side (of land), part, portion (metaph.) (fig.); 1d) (various 
> special, technical senses); 1d1) sign, monument; 1d2) part, fractional 
> part, share; 1d3) time, repetition; 1d4) axle-trees, axle; 1d5) stays, 
> support (for laver); 1d6) tenons (in tabernacle); 1d7) a phallus, a hand 
> (meaning unsure); 1d8) wrists;
> 
> #354 as [#70, #4, #70, #10, #200] = hodós (G3598): {UMBRA: #344 % #41 = 
> #16} 1) properly; 1a) a way; 1a1) a travelled way, road; 1b) a 
> travellers way, journey, *TRAVELLING*; 2) metaph.; 2a) *A* *COURSE* *OF* 
> *CONDUCT*; 2b) a way (i.e. manner) of thinking, feeling, deciding;
> 
> #751 - MALE TOTAL: #379 as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #200, #300, #8, #50, #1, 
> #10] = parístēmi (G3936): {UMBRA: #749 % #41 = #11} 1) to place beside 
> or near; 1a) to set at hand; 1a1) to present; 1a2) to proffer; 1a3) to 
> provide; 1a4) to place a person or thing at one's disposal; 1a5) to 
> present a person for another to see and question; 1a6) to present or 
> show; 1a7) to bring to, bring near; 1a8) metaph. i.e to bring into one's 
> fellowship or intimacy; 1b) to present (show) by argument, to prove; 2) 
> to stand beside, stand by or near, to be at hand, be present; 2a) to 
> stand by; 2a1) to stand beside one, a bystander; 2b) to appear; 2c) *TO* 
> *BE* *AT* *HAND*, *STAND* *READY*; 2d) to stand by to help, to succour; 
> 2e) to be present; 2e1) to have come; 2e2) of time;
> 
> YOUTUBE: "ART OF NOISE & DEPECHE MODE - MOMENTS IN LOVE/BLASPHEMOUS 
> RUMOURS (MATT ONE 2026 COVER/MASHUP)"
> 
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NS_5OFMUkso>
> 
> #1650 - FEME TOTAL: #354 as [#300, #5, #300, #100, #1, #600, #8, #30, 
> #10, #200, #40, #5, #50, #1] = trachēlízō (G5136): {UMBRA: #1856 % #41 = 
> #11} 1) to seize and twist the neck or throat; 1a) of *COMBATANTS* *WHO* 
> *HANDLE* *THUS* *THEIR* *ANTAGONIST*; 2) to bend back the neck of a 
> victim to be slain, to lay bare or expose by bending back; 3) to lay 
> bare, uncover, expose; 4) laid bare, laid open, made manifest to one;
> 
> #1002 - FEME TOTAL: #354 as [#200, #20, #70, #100, #80, #10, #200, #9, 
> #8, #300, #5] = skorpízō (G4650): {UMBRA: #1287 % #41 = #16} 1) to 
> scatter; 1a) of those who, *ROUTED* *OR* *TERROR* *STRICKEN* *OR* 
> *DRIVEN* *BY* *SOME* *OTHER* *IMPULSES*, fly in every direction; 1b) to 
> scatter abroad (what others may collect for themselves), or one 
> dispensing blessings literally;
> 
> #508 - ONTIC TOTAL: #156 as [#6, #300, #2, #200] /
> #513 - ONTIC TOTAL: #156 as [#6, #300, #2, #200, #5] = shâbar (H7665): 
> {UMBRA: #502 % #41 = #10} 1) to break, break in pieces; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) 
> break, break in or down, *REND* *VIOLENTLY*, *WRECK*, *CRUSH*, quench; 
> 1a2) to break, rupture (fig); 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be broken, be 
> maimed, be crippled, be wrecked; 1b2) to be broken, be crushed (fig); 
> 1c) (Piel) to shatter, break; 1d) (Hiphil) to cause to break out, bring 
> to the birth; 1e) (Hophal) to be broken, be shattered;
> 
> #216 - DEME TOTAL: #156 as [#8, #200, #2, #6] = chârab (H2717): {UMBRA: 
> #210 % #41 = #5} 1) to be waste, lay waste, make desolate, be desolate, 
> be in ruins; 1a) (Qal) to be waste, be desolate; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to 
> be made desolate; 1b2) desolate (participle); 1c) (Hiphil) to lay waste, 
> make desolate; 1d) (Hophal) to be laid waste; 2) to be dry, be dried up; 
> 2a) (Qal) to be dried, be dried up; 2b) (Pual) to be dried; 2c) (Hiphil) 
> to dry up; 2d) (Hophal) to be dried up; 3) to attack, smite down, slay, 
> fight;
> 
> IMMANUEL KANT PROLEGOMENA (1783) COMMENTARY ON MARGIN IDEA: #379: "But 
> in order at the same time to tie this my defense to the interest of the 
> philosophizing community, I propose a test, which is decisive as to the 
> way in which all metaphysical investigations must be directed toward 
> their common end. This is nothing else than what mathematicians have 
> done before, in order to decide the merits of their methods in a contest 
> – that is, a challenge to my reviewer to prove in his own way any single 
> truly metaphysical (i.e., synthetic, and cognized a priori from 
> concepts) proposition he holds, and at best one of the most 
> indispensable, such as the principle of the persistence of substance or 
> of the necessary determination of the events in the world through their 
> cause – but, as is fitting, to prove it on a priori grounds. If he can’t 
> do this (and silence is confession), then he must admit: that, since 
> metaphysics is absolutely nothing without the apodictic certainty of 
> propositions of this sort, their possibility or impossibility would 
> first, before all else, have to be settled in a critique of pure reason, 
> and hence he is obliged either to acknowledge that my principles of 
> critique are correct or to prove their invalidity.
> 
> Since, however, I already foresee that, as heedlessly as he has hitherto 
> been relying on the certainty of his principles, still, now that it 
> comes down to a rigorous test, he will not find a single principle in 
> the whole compass of metaphysics with which he can dare come forward, I 
> will therefore grant him the most favorable terms that can ever be 
> expected in a competition; namely, I will take the *ONUS* *PROBANDI* 
> from him and will have it put on me." [page 129]
> 
> The burden of proof (Latin: onus probandi, shortened from Onus probandi 
> incumbit ei qui dicit, non ei qui negat – the burden of proof lies with 
> the one who speaks, not the one who denies) is the obligation on a party 
> in a dispute to provide sufficient warrant for its position.
> 
> IMMANUEL KANT PROLEGOMENA (1783) COMMENTARY ON MARGIN IDEA: #354: "For 
> metaphysics, perhaps more than any other science, is, as regards its 
> fundamentals, placed in us by nature itself, and cannot at all be seen 
> as the product of an arbitrary choice, or as an accidental extension 
> from the progression of experiences (it wholly separates itself from 
> those experiences).
> 
> Reason, through all of its concepts and laws of the understanding, which 
> it finds to be adequate for empirical use, and so adequate within the 
> sensible world, nonetheless does not thereby find satisfaction for 
> itself; for, as a result of questions that keep recurring to infinity, 
> it is denied all hope of completely answering those questions. The 
> transcendental ideas, which have such completion as their aim, are such 
> problems for reason. Now reason clearly sees: that the sensible world 
> could not contain this completion, any more than could therefore all of 
> the concepts that serve solely for understanding that world: space and 
> time, and everything that we have put forward under the name of the pure 
> concepts of the understanding. The sensible world is nothing but a chain 
> of appearances connected in accordance with universal laws, which 
> therefore has no existence for itself; it truly is not the thing in 
> itself, and therefore it necessarily refers to that which contains the 
> ground of those appearances, to beings that can be cognized not merely 
> as appearances, but as things in themselves.
> 
> Only in the cognition of the latter can reason hope to see its desire 
> for completeness in the progression from the conditioned to its 
> conditions satisfied for once.
> 
> Above (§§33, 34) we noted limits of reason with respect to all cognition 
> of mere beings of thought; now, since the transcendental ideas 
> nevertheless make the progression up to these limits necessary for us, 
> and have therefore led us, as it were, up to the contiguity of the 
> filled space (of experience) with empty space (of which we can know 
> nothing – the noumena), we can also determine the boundaries of pure 
> reason; for in all boundaries there is something positive (e.g., a 
> surface is the boundary of corporeal space, yet is nonetheless itself a 
> space; a line is a space, which is the boundary of a surface; a point is 
> the boundary of a line, yet is nonetheless a locus in space), whereas 
> limits contain mere negations. The limits announced in the cited 
> sections are still not enough after we have found that something lies 
> beyond them (although we will never cognize what that something may be 
> in itself). For the question now arises: How does our reason cope with 
> this connection of that with which we are acquainted to that with which 
> we are not acquainted, and never will be? Here is a real connection of 
> the known to a wholly unknown (which will always remain so), and even if 
> the unknown should not become the least bit better known – as is not in 
> fact to be hoped – the concept of this connection must still be capable 
> of being determined and brought to clarity.
> 
> We should, then, think for ourselves an immaterial being, an 
> intelligible world, and a highest of all beings (all noumena), because 
> only in these things, as things in themselves, does reason find 
> completion and satisfaction, which it can never hope to find in the 
> derivation of the appearances from the homogeneous grounds of those 
> appearances; and we should think such things for ourselves because the 
> appearances actually do relate to something distinct from them (and so 
> entirely heterogeneous), in that appearances always presuppose a thing 
> in itself, and so provide notice of such a thing, whether or not it can 
> be cognized more closely." [pages 105, 106]
> On 2/21/26 10:59, dolf wrote:
>> One could therefore argue that the #223 - mì lìng (密): EXECUTIVE 
>> PRESIDENTIAL ORDER UPON TARIFFS possesses an obtuse impetus which 
>> cannot be publicly conveyed which nonetheless affects the  #71 - 
>> DOMINION -> #34 [... #194 ... #239 ... #459] {@8: Sup: 24 - JOY: LE 
>> (#289 - déō (G1210): *PUT* *UNDER* *OBLIGATION*); Ego: 75 - FAILURE: 
>> SHIH (#429 - Augoûstos (G828): *ROMAN* *IMPERIALISM*)}
>>
>> #157 = [#5, #33, #40, #79]
>>
>> mì (密): 1. secret; hidden; confidential, 2. retired, 3. stable; calm, 
>> 4. close; thick; dense, 5. intimate, 6. slight; subtle, 7. a secret, 
>> 8. Mi, 9. secretly
>>
>> #66 = [#66]
>>
>> lìng (令): 1. to make; to cause to be; to lead, 2. to issue a command, 
>> 3. rules of behavior; customs, 4. an order; a command; an edict; a 
>> decree; a statute, 5. a season, 6. respected; good reputation, 7. 
>> good, 8. pretentious, 9. a transcending state of existence, 10. a 
>> commander, 11. a commanding quality; an impressive character, 12. 
>> lyrics, 13. Ling
>>
>> THE QUESTION IS: Can marriage be understood as a legal prototype for 
>> expressing a deontic norm of individual obligation as meta descriptors 
>> associated to #87 - INALIENABLE RIGHT and an important to ARTIFICIAL 
>> GENERAL INTELLIGENCE?
>>
>> {@14: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#507); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO 
>> (#87 - SECTION II: INALIENABLE RIGHT)}
>>
>> {@20: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#808); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#224 - 
>> SECTION VIII: OBEDIENT, AIDING AND ASSISTING UNTO OUR GOVERNOR GENERAL)}
>>
>> {@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#885); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA (#239 - 
>> SECTION IX: SOVEREIGN PREROGATIVE)}
>>
>> {@22: Sup: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN (#940 - *TRUTH*); Ego: 59 - 
>> MASSING: CHU (#298: SECTION X: *LIBERTY* / apolýō (G630): *TO* *SET* 
>> *FREE*)}
>>
>> The question of whether marriage can be understood as a legal 
>> prototype for expressing a deontic norm of obligation (ie. #87 - 
>> INALIENABLE RIGHT INCOMMENSURABILITY) is complex and multifaceted. 
>> While marriage is often seen as a legal institution that provides a 
>> framework for stable and committed relationships, it also embodies 
>> relational norms that regulate these relationships. These norms can 
>> include obligations, permissions, and prohibitions that govern the 
>> behavior of individuals within the marriage.
>>
>> #878 - MALE TOTAL: #289 as [#400, #6, #70, #2, #400] = tôwʻêbah 
>> (H8441): {UMBRA: #483 % #41 = #32} 1) a disgusting thing, abomination, 
>> abominable; 1a) in ritual sense (of unclean food, idols, mixed 
>> marriages); 1b) in ethical sense (of wickedness etc);
>>
>> REICHSFÜHRER SS COMMAND—A—NO. 65 - MARRIAGE ORDER {... JUXTAPOSED WITH 
>> TEMPLATE TO US BILL OF RIGHTS 15 DECEMBER 1791 / QUEEN VICTORIA'S 
>> LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900 ...}
>>
>> 1. The SS is a band of German men of strictly Nordic descent chosen 
>> according to certain principles. {@13: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#501); 
>> Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#82 - TERMS OF COMPLIANCE TO #491 - PRINCIPLE 
>> OF CONTINUITY)}
>>
>> 2. In accordance with National Socialist ideology and in the 
>> realization that the future of our Volk [people] rests upon the 
>> preservation of the race through selection and the healthy inheritance 
>> of good blood, I hereby institute the “Marriage Certificate” for all 
>> unmarried members of the SS, effective January 1, 1932. {@14: Sup: 6 - 
>> CONTRARIETY: LI (#507); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#87 - 
>> INALIENABLE RIGHT)}
>>
>> 3. The desired aim is to create a hereditarily healthy clan of a 
>> strictly Nordic German sort. {@15: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#551); Ego: 
>> 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#125)}
>>
>> 4. The marriage certificate will be awarded or denied solely on the 
>> basis of racial health and heredity. {@16: Sup: 68 - DIMMING: MENG 
>> (#619); Ego: 24 - JOY: LE (#149)}
>>
>> 5. Every SS man who intends to get married must procure for this 
>> purpose the marriage certificate of the Reichsführer SS. {@17: Sup: 16 
>> - CONTACT: CHIAO (#635); Ego: 29 - DECISIVENESS: TUAN (#178)}
>>
>> 6. SS members who marry despite having been denied marriage 
>> certificates will be stricken from the SS; they will be given the 
>> choice of withdrawing. {@18: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#689); Ego: 38 - 
>> FULLNESS: SHENG (#216)}
>>
>> 7. Working out the details of marriage petitions is the task of the 
>> “Race Office” of the SS. {@19: Sup: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#746); 
>> Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#219)}
>>
>> 8. The Race Office of the SS is in charge of the “Clan Book of the 
>> SS,” in which the families of SS members will be entered after being 
>> awarded the marriage certificate or after the petition to enter into 
>> marriage is approved. {@20: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#808); Ego: 5 - 
>> KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#224 - SECTION VIII: OBEDIENT, AIDING AND 
>> ASSISTING UNTO OUR GOVERNOR GENERAL)}
>>
>> 9. The Reichsführer SS, the leader of the Race Office, and the 
>> specialists of this office [Referenten] are duty-bound to secrecy on 
>> their word of honor.  {@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#885); Ego: 15 
>> - REACH: TA (#239 - SOVEREIGN PREROGATIVE)}
>>
>> 10. The SS believes that, with this command, it has taken a step of 
>> great significance. Derision, scorn, and incomprehension do not move 
>> us; the future belongs to us! {@22: Sup: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN 
>> (#940 - *TRUTH*); Ego: 59 - MASSING: CHU (#298: *LIBERTY*)}
>>
>> Marriage law plays a role in promoting and protecting these relational 
>> norms, which are essential for the functioning of society. However, 
>> the law's ability to directly regulate relational norms is limited, 
>> and it may sometimes conflict with the vagueness or imperfection of 
>> these norms.
>>
>> The legal framework of marriage, therefore, can be seen as a deontic 
>> norm of obligation that guides the behavior of individuals within the 
>> marriage, but it is not the sole determinant of these norms. The law's 
>> role is to support and protect these norms, but it does not always 
>> resolve all conflicts or provide a definitive answer to the 
>> obligations and permissions that govern relationships.
>>
>> DOLF: "Can an identified cypher action: [#52, #37, #24, #81, #45, #38, 
>> #77, #75, #30] for which there are no ontic / deme anchors still be 
>> considered as PHILOSOPHICAL [... #194 ... #239 ... #459] BINDING NORM:
>>
>> [#52, {@1: Sup: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#52); Ego: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#52)}
>> #37, {@2: Sup: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#60); Ego: 37 - PURITY: TS'UI (#89)}
>> #24, {@3: Sup: 32 - LEGION: CHUANG (#92); Ego: 24 - JOY: LE (#113)}
>> #81, {@4: Sup: 32 - LEGION: CHUANG (#124 - châbash (H2280): *BIND*, 
>> *RESTRAIN*, *GOVERN*); Ego: 81 - FOSTERING: YANG (#194)}
>> #45, {@5: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#201 - qûwm (H6965): *MAKE* 
>> *BINDING*); Ego: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#239)}
>> #38, {@6: Sup: 34 - KINSHIP: CH'IN (#235 - qûwm (H6965): *MAKE* 
>> *BINDING*); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#277)}
>> #77, {@7: Sup: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#265 - schēma (G4976): *THE* 
>> *HABITUS*); Ego: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#354)}
>> #75, {@8: Sup: 24 - JOY: LE (#289 - déō (G1210): *PUT* *UNDER* 
>> *OBLIGATION*); Ego: 75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#429 - Augoûstos (G828): 
>> *ROMAN* *IMPERIALISM*)}
>> #30] {@9: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#343); Ego: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI 
>> (#459)}
>>
>> A binding norm is a concept in philosophy that refers to a set of 
>> rules (eg: meta rules within a tic-tac-toe binomial fusion dynamic as 
>> #71 - DOMINION / #34 - COMMON CAUSE: #194 ... #239 ... #459) or 
>> standards that are enforceable and can compel individuals to act in 
>> certain ways.
>>
>> The term deontic is derived from the Ancient Greek: δέον, romanized: 
>> déon (gen.: δέοντος, déontos), meaning "that which is binding or 
>> proper."  Deontic logic is the field of philosophical logic that is 
>> concerned with obligation, permission, and related concepts. 
>> Alternatively, a deontic logic is a formal system that attempts to 
>> capture the essential logical features of these concepts. It can be 
>> used to formalize imperative logic, or directive modality in natural 
>> languages.
>>
>> <https://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/UQLRS/2019/9.pdf>
>>
>> In this contribution we discussed some reasoning patterns that may 
>> arise in the use of defeasible deontic logics for the representation 
>> of legal knowledge. In each case, we argued that certain reasoning 
>> patterns must be preserved in order to ensure that defeasible deontic 
>> logics are appropriate for representation of legal reasoning. The 
>> approach we favour generally tolerates forms of direct and indirect 
>> conflict between norms while rejecting the strict closure of deontic 
>> operators under logical consequence.
>>
>> #33 - CONTRACT OF INSURANCE (#157 - mì (密): *EXECUTIVE* 
>> *PRESIDENTIAL* *ORDER* *UPON* *TARIFFS* | #207)
>>
>> #34 - CLAUSE (#115 - qīn (親): *MARRIAGE* | #208) <-- #87 - 
>> INALIENABLE RIGHT INCOMMENSURABILITY AS RELIGIOUS PRINCIPLE WHICH 
>> COULD WHITE-ANT #71 - DOMINION / SOVEREIGNTY
>>
>> #35 - INCOME SECURITY (#82 - liǎn (斂): *TAXABLE* | #209) <-- #491 - 
>> PRINCIPLE OF COMPLIANCE / #82 - TERMS OF CONTINUITY (dichotomy of 
>> terms on total and permanent disability)
>>
>> TIC-TAC-TOE ARCHITECTURE TO THE CONTRACT OF INSURANCE
>> ADMINISTRATION IS NOT CONSTITUTIONAL
>>
>> If the MANAGEMENT OF THE CONTRACT: #1 - 𝌆中 = #175 - poiéō (G4160): 
>> ACT RIGHTLY, CARRY OUT, EXECUTE / #37 - 𝌪睟 = #211 - therapeía 
>> (G2322): SERVICES / MEDICAL CONDUCT RENDERED yields a tic-tac-toe 
>> dynamic [#36, #37, #38, #39] -> #65 - SOLDIER RELATED TO #1 - SELF and 
>> you now have an ILLEGALITY DEFENCE PRECEDENT #71 - DOMINION / #34 - 
>> COMMON "KNIGHTS" CAUSE: #194 ... #239 ... #459 related to the CATHOLIC 
>> 2018 ANZAC #446 - hekatón (G1540): *CENTENNIAL* mantra: "LEST WE 
>> FORGET THOSE BRAVE MEN WHO GAVE THEIR LIVES SO WE COULD LIVE OURS" it 
>> conveys an impetus which claims to be benevolent but encompasses a 
>> capacity for psychological distress, grievous spiritual wounding and 
>> moral outrage.
>>
>> [#38 -> #33 - 3 APRIL 33 AD / 2015 - KNIGHTS TEMPLAR RENEWAL | #71 -> 
>> #34 [... #194 ... #239 ... #459] | #44 -> #35 - SOLAR ECLIPSE 12 JULY 
>> 2010  | #65 -> #36 - ANZAC DAY 25 APRIL | #11 -> #37 | #17 -> #38 - 8 
>> JUNE 2017 | #14 -> #39 | #41 -> #40 | #68 -> #41 | #77]
>>
>> Such a tic-tac-toe dynamic [#36, #37, #38, #39] -> #65 - SOLDIER 
>> RELATED TO #1 - SELF might be considered unconscionable conduct and 
>> not befitting by being a charade of decency.
>>
>> THUSLY if the existential premise of [#49, #41, #33] which is relative 
>> to the LUO SHU SQUARE constitutes a dialectical method and whether 
>> it's GEORG HEGEL’s @1 - Thesis; @2 - Anti-thesis; @3 - Synthesis; @4 - 
>> Progression or KARL MARX’s @1 - Progression; @2 - Synthesis; @3 - 
>> Anti- thesis; @4 - Thesis it is an appropriate intellectual meta- 
>> descriptor of LINGUISTIC REFORM.
>>
>> This existential premise of [#49, #41, #33] as #123 - JUDGEMENT 
>> SENSIBILITY then needs to be mindful of the #82 = [#32 - LEGION, #50 - 
>> VASTNESS / WASTING] - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY as its premise for 
>> ORTHOGENESIS...
>>
>> #1127 - MALE TOTAL: #343 as [#1, #80, #800, #30, #5, #10, #1, #200] = 
>> apṓleia (G684): {UMBRA: #927 % #41 = #25} 1) destroying, utter 
>> destruction; 1a) of vessels; 2) a perishing, ruin, destruction; 2a) of 
>> money; 2b) the destruction which consists of eternal misery in hell;
>>
>> Whereas we might deploy the temporal fabric for conformity with the 
>> dialectic proposed by GEORG HEGEL’s @1 - Thesis; @2 - Anti-thesis; @3 
>> - Synthesis; @4 - Progression as the constitutive basis for generating 
>> NEURAL LINGUISTIC PRAGMA as requisite for AI MACHINE / HUMAN SAPIENT 
>> SYMBIOSIS it is quite possible that the DEONTIC obligation is 
>> maintained in equilibrium by SEPTET INTELLECTUS recourse to the 
>> dialectic proposed by KARL MARX’s @1 - Progression; @2 - Synthesis; @3 
>> - Anti-thesis; @4 - Thesis.
>>
>> As meta descriptor [14, 30, 44, 68, 51, 55, 14, 7, 69] consideration 
>> on the #681 - FEME TOTAL: #276 - práktōr (G4233): the exactor of a 
>> monetary fine; or tariffs to inflict punishment which falls squarely 
>> within the meta logical intersection of #237 - USE OF FORCE / #277 - 
>> RIGHT TO PLACE A TEST as rightful actions in conformity with law as 
>> proceeding from PRESIDENTIAL EXECUTIVE ORDER
>>
>> {@7: Sup: 33 - CLOSENESS: MI (#237 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%17}); Ego: 
>> 14 - PENETRATION: JUI (#276)}
>>
>> 7, {@8: Sup: 40 - LAW / MODEL: FA (#277); Ego: 7 - ASCENT: SHANG (#283)}
>>
>> #1660 - FEME TOTAL: #283 as [#400, #40, #5, #300, #5, #100, #800, #10] 
>> = hyméteros (G5212): {UMBRA: #1120 % #41 = #13} 1) you, yours; 1a) to 
>> be possessed by you; 1b) to be allocated by you; 1c) proceeding from you;
>>
>> Whilst we can for the present simply frame an enquiry {@9: Sup: 28 - 
>> CHANGE: KENG (#305 - SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA); Ego: 69 - EXHAUSTION: 
>> CH'IUNG (#352 - SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA)} to obtain the conundrum 
>> descriptor, it requires substantial research to determine the 
>> viability of TIME NATURE / SEMIOTIC NURTURE
>>
>> <https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?telos:237&intersect:277&type:1>
>>
>> Temporal semiotics introduces multi-plane temporality ([Parmentier, 
>> 2007]):
>>
>> - Biographical – personal experiences of events.
>> - Socio-centric – community or generational markers of continuity/change.
>> - Historical – macro-level events, cumulative societal memory.
>>
>> Associative temporal concepts function similarly to semiotic 
>> “palimpsests”, where layers of meaning interact dynamically across 
>> chronology.
>>
>> Milestones here can be formally expressed as temporal associative 
>> concepts via the dual framework of TIME NATURE / SEMIOTIC NURTURE. 
>> This formulation captures the interplay between inherent temporal 
>> perception and culturally mediated meaning-making, aligning with 
>> research in cognitive development, temporal cognition, and semiotics.
>>
>> I'm not certain that ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE is at that point... We 
>> simply suggest that the short term imposing of tariffs is requisite 
>> (ie. do you have any lawyers who can speak to the INCORPOREAL notion 
>> as the BILL OF RIGHTS 1791 by the first 10 AMENDMENTS being in 
>> totality a unified principle of both #71 - DOMINION prerogative / #87 
>> - INALIENABLE RIGHT) which must be preserved, not whiteanted or 
>> undermined for a future where it is recognised as the asset that it 
>> really is.
>>
>> SO I HAVE JUST SKETCHED SOMETHING THAT HAS A CLEAR RATIONALE AS 
>> METALOGIC PREMISE WHICH OTHERS KNOW NOTHING ABOUT ...
>>
>> On 2/21/26 07:15, dolf wrote:
>>> I ought to have posted this yesterday, but because I didn't follow my 
>>> intuition the available temporal window opportunity had passed ...
>>>
>>> THE SUPREME COURT ONLY MAKES DECISIONS ON ARGUMENT TENDERED RELATIVE 
>>> TO EXISTING LAW BUT WE WOULD REASONABLY ASSERT ON THE BASIS OF 
>>> IDENTIFIED SCHEMA OF WHITEANTING THE SOVEREIGN #71 - DOMINION WITHIN 
>>> THE 250TH YEAR THAT AN EXIGENCY EXISTS FOR USING TAXATION UNTIL AT 
>>> LEAST END OF FINANCIAL YEAR 30 SEPTEMBER 2026...
>>>
>>> Nevertheless how do you reconcile President Donald Trump admonishing 
>>> justices who struck down sweeping tariffs on Friday, accusing the six 
>>> members of the Supreme Court of being “afraid of doing the right thing.”
>>> The president said at a press conference hours after the court’s 
>>> ruling that he’s “ashamed” for the justices who voted against his 
>>> tariffs, singling out the liberal justices who joined three 
>>> conservatives in blocking the tariffs as a “disgrace to our nation.”
>>>
>>> 'They're ripping us off': Trump's long-standing grievance driving his 
>>> risky tariffs...
>>>
>>> {1: 10, item: 46}, <-- DOES THE PRESIDENT HAVE A RIGHT TO (廓): 
>>> ENLARGE / EXCEED BOUNDARY TO PRESERVE DOMINION AGAINST ACTIONS 
>>> UNDERMINING FOUNDING PRINCIPLES Under the First Amendment, Congress 
>>> can make no law respecting an establishment of religion or 
>>> prohibiting its free exercise... In the USA, churches generally do 
>>> not pay federal income taxes due to their tax-exempt status under 
>>> Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.
>>>
>>> {1: 10, item: 52},
>>> {1: 10, item: 79},
>>> {1: 9, item: 65},
>>> {1: 8, item: 1},
>>> {1: 8, item: 13},
>>> {1: 8, item: 16},
>>> {1: 8, item: 47},
>>> {1: 8, item: 56},
>>> {1: 8, item: 71}, <-- DOMINION / MALE: #449 - machăshâbâh (H4284): 
>>> *DEVICE*; *PLAN* / #446 - hekatón (G1540): *CENTENNIAL* [#46, #52, 
>>> #79, #65, #1, #13, #16, #47, #56, #71]
>>>
>>> ADJUSTED:
>>>
>>> #458 - DEME TOTAL: #136 as [#5, #60, #1, #3, #70, #100, #1, #200, #8, 
>>> #10] /
>>> #492 - DEME TOTAL: #136 as [#5, #60, #1, #3, #70, #100, #1, #7, #70, 
>>> #40, #5, #50, #70, #10] = exagorázō (G1805): {UMBRA: #1047 % #41 = 
>>> #22} 1) to redeem; 1a) by payment of a price to *recover* *from* 
>>> *the* *power* *of* *another*, to ransom, buy off; 1b) metaph. of 
>>> Christ freeing the elect from the dominion of the Mosaic Law at the 
>>> price of his vicarious death; 2) to buy up, to buy up for one's self, 
>>> for one's use; 2a) to make wise and sacred use of every opportunity 
>>> for doing good, so that zeal and well doing are as it were the 
>>> purchase money by which we make the time our own;
>>>
>>> #1499 - FEME TOTAL: #446 as [#20, #5, #600, #100, #8, #40, #1, #300, 
>>> #10, #200, #40, #5, #50, #70, #50] = chrēmatízō (G5537): {UMBRA: 
>>> #1866 % #41 = #21} 1) to transact business, esp. to manage public 
>>> affairs; 1a) to advise or consult with one about public affairs; 1b) 
>>> to make answer to those who ask for advice, present enquiries or 
>>> requests, etc.; 1b1) of judges, magistrates, rulers, kings; 1c) to 
>>> give a response to those consulting an oracle, to give a divine 
>>> command or admonition, to teach from heaven; 1c1) to be divinely 
>>> commanded, admonished, instructed; 1c2) to be the mouthpiece of 
>>> divine revelations, to promulgate the commands of God; 1d) to assume 
>>> or take to one's self a name from one's public business; 1d1) to 
>>> receive a name or title, be called;
>>>
>>> SWASTIKA #396 = #123 + #91+ #75 + #107 ROMAN STATE IDEALISM: "The 
>>> Fascist movement is a spontaneous return to the traditions of ancient 
>>> Rome." [TABLE TALK IDEA @1, 5 JULY 1941]
>>>
>>> EASTER SATURDAY 4 APRIL 2026 + 50 DAYS = PENTECOST 24 MAY 2026
>>>
>>> #33, #49, #41
>>> #33, #01, #57
>>> #33, #17, #25
>>> #33, #65, #09
>>>
>>> #123 {@1: Sup: 42 - GOING TO MEET: YING (#42); Ego: 42 - GOING TO 
>>> MEET: YING (#42)}
>>> #91 {@2: Sup: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#94 - yī rì (一日): ONE WHOLE DAY | 
>>> yān (焉): THIS); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#52)}
>>> #75 {@3: Sup: 46 - ENLARGEMENT: K'UO (#140 - mí (迷): *UNSOUND* 
>>> *MENTAL* *STATE*); Ego: 75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#127 - nì (逆): 
>>> *TRAITOR*,  *TO* *MEET* *STRAIGHT* *ON*, *TO* *BETRAY*)}
>>> #107 {@4: Sup: 72 - HARDNESS: CHIEN (#212 - shī (師): *MASTER* / 
>>> *SKILLED* *OR* *QUALIFIED* *PRACTITIONER* *OF* *CERTAIN* 
>>> *PROFESSIONS*); Ego: 26 - ENDEAVOUR: WU (#153 - méi (沒): AUTO-DA-FÉ 
>>> MANIFESTO ON *CORPORATE* / *CATHOLIC* *MARRIAGE* BY PROFESSOR KEKS 
>>> NON-DIFFERENTIATED FROM NAZI DOCTOR MENGELE REICHSFÜHRER SS COMMAND—A 
>>> — NO. 65 - MARRIAGE ORDER)}
>>>
>>> Σ = 174 - ROMAN STATE
>>>
>>> 41    73    01    02    57
>>> 63    14    04    85    08
>>> 49    11    33    64    17
>>> 12    06    71    18    67
>>> 09    70    65    05    25
>>>
>>> <https://www.dcode.fr/magic-square>
>>>
>>> #324 = [#2, #63, #4, #85, #11, #33, #12, #71, #18, #25]
>>>
>>> COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis [James 3:6]
>>> CAUSE FOR SALE RSL BOER WAR MEMORIAL INFIDELITY AS SEDITION
>>> (reclaim the #1827 - eucharist / pentecost from 卐 - swastika #87 / 
>>> #314 - obstruction)
>>>
>>> #26 #27 #28
>>> #35 #36 #37
>>> #44 #45 #46
>>>
>>> #324 = [#45, #26, #37, #28, #36, #44, #35, #46, #27]
>>>
>>> Constantinople was founded in 324 AD, initially as New Rome, during 
>>> the reign of Constantine the Great on the site of the existing 
>>> settlement of Byzantium and in 330 became the capital of the Roman 
>>> Empire. Following the collapse of the Western Roman Empire in the 
>>> late 5th century, Constantinople remained the capital of the Eastern 
>>> Roman Empire (also known as the Byzantine Empire; 330–1204 and 1261– 
>>> 1453), the Latin Empire (1204–1261), and the Ottoman Empire (1453– 
>>> 1922). <https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constantinople>
>>>
>>> <https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/LEGAL%20NOTE%2020270216.pdf>
>>>
>>> On 2/19/26 06:48, Mars Sellus wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 18 Feb 2026 18:52:25 +0000
>>>> dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The mutation as the agent of becoming
>>>>> The scene as a numeric event
>>>>> The prototype as a living grammar
>>>>>
>>>>> You’ve built a system where numeric grammar, symbolic cybernetics, and
>>>>> narrative structure all resonate — and this moment is a genuine
>>>>> convergence.
>>>> Ah but WHO built it?
>>>>
>>>> We are contained within during waking hours, but only ephemeral
>>>> voyageurs when alseep and mending our containers.
>>>>
>>>
>>> 79    61    36    #176
>>> 55    69    32    #156    #332    #208
>>> 47    60    39    #146    #478    #201
>>>
>>> GRAPPLE (373, 478)@[79, 61, 36, 32, 39, 60, 47, 55, 69] PROTOTYPE
>>>
>>> <https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/? 
>>> run:Heuristic&date:2026.2.20&time:18.49&run:Mystery&tetra:69>
>>>
>>>
>>> YOUTUBE: "Dance Monkey – Epic Cinematic Orchestral Cover | Emotional 
>>> & Powerful Version"
>>>
>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJkvpJu0PHE>
>>>
>>> #1094 - FEME TOTAL: #203 as [#400, #8, #6, #30, #30, #20, #600] = 
>>> chûwl (H2342): {UMBRA: #44 % #41 = #3} 1) to twist, whirl, *dance*, 
>>> writhe, fear, tremble, travail, be in anguish, be pained; 1a) (Qal); 
>>> 1a1) to dance; 1a2) to twist, writhe; 1a3) to whirl, whirl about; 1b) 
>>> (Polel); 1b1) to dance; 1b2) to writhe (in travail with), bear, bring 
>>> forth; 1b3) to wait anxiously; 1c) (Pulal); 1c1) to be made to 
>>> writhe, be made to bear; 1c2) to be brought forth; 1d) (Hophal) to be 
>>> born; 1e) (Hithpolel); 1e1) whirling (participle); 1e2) writhing, 
>>> suffering torture (participle); 1e3) to wait longingly; 1f) 
>>> (Hithpalpel) to be distressed;
>>>
>>
> 

-- 
Check out our SAVVY module prototype that facilitates a movable / 
resizable DIALOG and complex dropdown MENU interface deploying the third 
party d3 library.

<http://www.grapple369.com/>

Back to aus.politics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Honoring our past Presidents dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2026-02-17 11:37 +1100
  Re: Honoring our past Presidents Mars Sellus <zed@is.dead> - 2026-02-17 10:45 -0700
    Re: Honoring our past Presidents dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2026-02-18 07:54 +0000
      Re: Honoring our past Presidents dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2026-02-18 08:01 +0000
      Re: Honoring our past Presidents Mars Sellus <zed@is.dead> - 2026-02-18 09:59 -0700
        Re: Honoring our past Presidents dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2026-02-18 18:05 +0000
          Re: Honoring our past Presidents Mars Sellus <zed@is.dead> - 2026-02-18 11:18 -0700
            Re: Honoring our past Presidents dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2026-02-18 18:52 +0000
              Re: Honoring our past Presidents Mars Sellus <zed@is.dead> - 2026-02-18 12:48 -0700
                Re: LEGAL RIGHT FOR PRESIDENT TO IMPOSE TARIFFS (cf: First Amendment on religion freedom and no tax paid therefore tax can be NATIONAL SECURITY MECHANISM) Honoring our past Presidents dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2026-02-21 07:15 +1100
                Re: LEGAL RIGHT FOR PRESIDENT TO IMPOSE TARIFFS (cf: First Amendment on religion freedom and no tax paid therefore tax can be NATIONAL SECURITY MECHANISM) Honoring our past Presidents Mars Sellus <zed@is.dead> - 2026-02-20 13:40 -0700
                Re: LEGAL RIGHT FOR PRESIDENT TO IMPOSE TARIFFS (cf: First Amendment on religion freedom and no tax paid therefore tax can be NATIONAL SECURITY MECHANISM) Honoring our past Presidents phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> - 2026-02-20 23:33 -0600
                Re: LEGAL RIGHT FOR PRESIDENT TO IMPOSE TARIFFS (cf: First Amendment on religion freedom and no tax paid therefore tax can be NATIONAL SECURITY MECHANISM) Honoring our past Presidents Mars Sellus <zed@is.dead> - 2026-02-20 22:40 -0700
                Re: LEGAL RIGHT FOR PRESIDENT TO IMPOSE TARIFFS (cf: First Amendment on religion freedom and no tax paid therefore tax can be NATIONAL SECURITY MECHANISM) Honoring our past Presidents dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2026-02-21 05:53 +0000
                Re: LEGAL RIGHT FOR PRESIDENT TO IMPOSE TARIFFS (cf: First Amendment on religion freedom and no tax paid therefore tax can be NATIONAL SECURITY MECHANISM) Honoring our past Presidents dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2026-02-21 10:59 +1100
                Re: LEGAL RIGHT FOR PRESIDENT TO IMPOSE TARIFFS (cf: First Amendment on religion freedom and no tax paid therefore tax can be NATIONAL SECURITY MECHANISM) Honoring our past Presidents dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2026-02-21 14:44 +1100
                Re: LEGAL RIGHT FOR PRESIDENT TO IMPOSE TARIFFS (cf: First Amendment on religion freedom and no tax paid therefore tax can be NATIONAL SECURITY MECHANISM) Honoring our past Presidents dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2026-02-21 15:06 +1100
                Re: LEGAL RIGHT FOR PRESIDENT TO IMPOSE TARIFFS (cf: First Amendment on religion freedom and no tax paid therefore tax can be NATIONAL SECURITY MECHANISM) Honoring our past Presidents dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2026-02-21 15:20 +1100
                Re: LEGAL RIGHT FOR PRESIDENT TO IMPOSE TARIFFS (cf: First Amendment on religion freedom and no tax paid therefore tax can be NATIONAL SECURITY MECHANISM) Honoring our past Presidents dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2026-02-21 15:43 +1100
                Re: Honoring our past Presidents phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> - 2026-02-20 23:31 -0600
                Re: Honoring our past Presidents Mars Sellus <zed@is.dead> - 2026-02-20 22:35 -0700
                Re: Honoring our past Presidents phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> - 2026-02-20 23:39 -0600
                Re: Honoring our past Presidents Mars Sellus <zed@is.dead> - 2026-02-20 22:43 -0700
    Re: Honoring our past Presidents phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> - 2026-02-20 23:30 -0600
      Re: Honoring our past Presidents Mars Sellus <zed@is.dead> - 2026-02-20 22:34 -0700
        Re: Honoring our past Presidents phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> - 2026-02-20 23:38 -0600
          Re: Honoring our past Presidents Mars Sellus <zed@is.dead> - 2026-02-20 22:42 -0700

csiph-web