Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > aus.politics > #759767
| From | dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | aus.politics, rec.food.cooking, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.atheism, alt.politics |
| Subject | Re: LEGAL RIGHT FOR PRESIDENT TO IMPOSE TARIFFS (cf: First Amendment on religion freedom and no tax paid therefore tax can be NATIONAL SECURITY MECHANISM) Honoring our past Presidents |
| Date | 2026-02-21 10:59 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <mvsaqsF377iU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <mvmdbbF21s2U1@mid.individual.net> <20260218111826.7d206d42@z-z> <cQmdnb-YhYP0lwv0nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com> <20260218124814.6755e647@z-z> <mvrtmdFtmcU1@mid.individual.net> |
Cross-posted to 5 groups.
One could therefore argue that the #223 - mì lìng (密): EXECUTIVE
PRESIDENTIAL ORDER UPON TARIFFS possesses an obtuse impetus which cannot
be publicly conveyed which nonetheless affects the #71 - DOMINION ->
#34 [... #194 ... #239 ... #459] {@8: Sup: 24 - JOY: LE (#289 - déō
(G1210): *PUT* *UNDER* *OBLIGATION*); Ego: 75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#429 -
Augoûstos (G828): *ROMAN* *IMPERIALISM*)}
#157 = [#5, #33, #40, #79]
mì (密): 1. secret; hidden; confidential, 2. retired, 3. stable; calm, 4.
close; thick; dense, 5. intimate, 6. slight; subtle, 7. a secret, 8. Mi,
9. secretly
#66 = [#66]
lìng (令): 1. to make; to cause to be; to lead, 2. to issue a command, 3.
rules of behavior; customs, 4. an order; a command; an edict; a decree;
a statute, 5. a season, 6. respected; good reputation, 7. good, 8.
pretentious, 9. a transcending state of existence, 10. a commander, 11.
a commanding quality; an impressive character, 12. lyrics, 13. Ling
THE QUESTION IS: Can marriage be understood as a legal prototype for
expressing a deontic norm of individual obligation as meta descriptors
associated to #87 - INALIENABLE RIGHT and an important to ARTIFICIAL
GENERAL INTELLIGENCE?
{@14: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#507); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#87
- SECTION II: INALIENABLE RIGHT)}
{@20: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#808); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#224 -
SECTION VIII: OBEDIENT, AIDING AND ASSISTING UNTO OUR GOVERNOR GENERAL)}
{@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#885); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA (#239 -
SECTION IX: SOVEREIGN PREROGATIVE)}
{@22: Sup: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN (#940 - *TRUTH*); Ego: 59 - MASSING:
CHU (#298: SECTION X: *LIBERTY* / apolýō (G630): *TO* *SET* *FREE*)}
The question of whether marriage can be understood as a legal prototype
for expressing a deontic norm of obligation (ie. #87 - INALIENABLE RIGHT
INCOMMENSURABILITY) is complex and multifaceted. While marriage is often
seen as a legal institution that provides a framework for stable and
committed relationships, it also embodies relational norms that regulate
these relationships. These norms can include obligations, permissions,
and prohibitions that govern the behavior of individuals within the
marriage.
#878 - MALE TOTAL: #289 as [#400, #6, #70, #2, #400] = tôwʻêbah (H8441):
{UMBRA: #483 % #41 = #32} 1) a disgusting thing, abomination,
abominable; 1a) in ritual sense (of unclean food, idols, mixed
marriages); 1b) in ethical sense (of wickedness etc);
REICHSFÜHRER SS COMMAND—A—NO. 65 - MARRIAGE ORDER {... JUXTAPOSED WITH
TEMPLATE TO US BILL OF RIGHTS 15 DECEMBER 1791 / QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900 ...}
1. The SS is a band of German men of strictly Nordic descent chosen
according to certain principles. {@13: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#501);
Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#82 - TERMS OF COMPLIANCE TO #491 - PRINCIPLE OF
CONTINUITY)}
2. In accordance with National Socialist ideology and in the realization
that the future of our Volk [people] rests upon the preservation of the
race through selection and the healthy inheritance of good blood, I
hereby institute the “Marriage Certificate” for all unmarried members of
the SS, effective January 1, 1932. {@14: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI
(#507); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#87 - INALIENABLE RIGHT)}
3. The desired aim is to create a hereditarily healthy clan of a
strictly Nordic German sort. {@15: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#551); Ego: 38
- FULLNESS: SHENG (#125)}
4. The marriage certificate will be awarded or denied solely on the
basis of racial health and heredity. {@16: Sup: 68 - DIMMING: MENG
(#619); Ego: 24 - JOY: LE (#149)}
5. Every SS man who intends to get married must procure for this purpose
the marriage certificate of the Reichsführer SS. {@17: Sup: 16 -
CONTACT: CHIAO (#635); Ego: 29 - DECISIVENESS: TUAN (#178)}
6. SS members who marry despite having been denied marriage certificates
will be stricken from the SS; they will be given the choice of
withdrawing. {@18: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#689); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS:
SHENG (#216)}
7. Working out the details of marriage petitions is the task of the
“Race Office” of the SS. {@19: Sup: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#746); Ego:
3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#219)}
8. The Race Office of the SS is in charge of the “Clan Book of the SS,”
in which the families of SS members will be entered after being awarded
the marriage certificate or after the petition to enter into marriage is
approved. {@20: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#808); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
(#224 - SECTION VIII: OBEDIENT, AIDING AND ASSISTING UNTO OUR GOVERNOR
GENERAL)}
9. The Reichsführer SS, the leader of the Race Office, and the
specialists of this office [Referenten] are duty-bound to secrecy on
their word of honor. {@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#885); Ego: 15 -
REACH: TA (#239 - SOVEREIGN PREROGATIVE)}
10. The SS believes that, with this command, it has taken a step of
great significance. Derision, scorn, and incomprehension do not move us;
the future belongs to us! {@22: Sup: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN (#940 -
*TRUTH*); Ego: 59 - MASSING: CHU (#298: *LIBERTY*)}
Marriage law plays a role in promoting and protecting these relational
norms, which are essential for the functioning of society. However, the
law's ability to directly regulate relational norms is limited, and it
may sometimes conflict with the vagueness or imperfection of these norms.
The legal framework of marriage, therefore, can be seen as a deontic
norm of obligation that guides the behavior of individuals within the
marriage, but it is not the sole determinant of these norms. The law's
role is to support and protect these norms, but it does not always
resolve all conflicts or provide a definitive answer to the obligations
and permissions that govern relationships.
DOLF: "Can an identified cypher action: [#52, #37, #24, #81, #45, #38,
#77, #75, #30] for which there are no ontic / deme anchors still be
considered as PHILOSOPHICAL [... #194 ... #239 ... #459] BINDING NORM:
[#52, {@1: Sup: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#52); Ego: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#52)}
#37, {@2: Sup: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#60); Ego: 37 - PURITY: TS'UI (#89)}
#24, {@3: Sup: 32 - LEGION: CHUANG (#92); Ego: 24 - JOY: LE (#113)}
#81, {@4: Sup: 32 - LEGION: CHUANG (#124 - châbash (H2280): *BIND*,
*RESTRAIN*, *GOVERN*); Ego: 81 - FOSTERING: YANG (#194)}
#45, {@5: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#201 - qûwm (H6965): *MAKE*
*BINDING*); Ego: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#239)}
#38, {@6: Sup: 34 - KINSHIP: CH'IN (#235 - qûwm (H6965): *MAKE*
*BINDING*); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#277)}
#77, {@7: Sup: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#265 - schēma (G4976): *THE*
*HABITUS*); Ego: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#354)}
#75, {@8: Sup: 24 - JOY: LE (#289 - déō (G1210): *PUT* *UNDER*
*OBLIGATION*); Ego: 75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#429 - Augoûstos (G828): *ROMAN*
*IMPERIALISM*)}
#30] {@9: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#343); Ego: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI
(#459)}
A binding norm is a concept in philosophy that refers to a set of rules
(eg: meta rules within a tic-tac-toe binomial fusion dynamic as #71 -
DOMINION / #34 - COMMON CAUSE: #194 ... #239 ... #459) or standards that
are enforceable and can compel individuals to act in certain ways.
The term deontic is derived from the Ancient Greek: δέον, romanized:
déon (gen.: δέοντος, déontos), meaning "that which is binding or
proper." Deontic logic is the field of philosophical logic that is
concerned with obligation, permission, and related concepts.
Alternatively, a deontic logic is a formal system that attempts to
capture the essential logical features of these concepts. It can be used
to formalize imperative logic, or directive modality in natural languages.
<https://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/UQLRS/2019/9.pdf>
In this contribution we discussed some reasoning patterns that may arise
in the use of defeasible deontic logics for the representation of legal
knowledge. In each case, we argued that certain reasoning patterns must
be preserved in order to ensure that defeasible deontic logics are
appropriate for representation of legal reasoning. The approach we
favour generally tolerates forms of direct and indirect conflict between
norms while rejecting the strict closure of deontic operators under
logical consequence.
#33 - CONTRACT OF INSURANCE (#157 - mì (密): *EXECUTIVE* *PRESIDENTIAL*
*ORDER* *UPON* *TARIFFS* | #207)
#34 - CLAUSE (#115 - qīn (親): *MARRIAGE* | #208) <-- #87 - INALIENABLE
RIGHT INCOMMENSURABILITY AS RELIGIOUS PRINCIPLE WHICH COULD WHITE-ANT
#71 - DOMINION / SOVEREIGNTY
#35 - INCOME SECURITY (#82 - liǎn (斂): *TAXABLE* | #209) <-- #491 -
PRINCIPLE OF COMPLIANCE / #82 - TERMS OF CONTINUITY (dichotomy of terms
on total and permanent disability)
TIC-TAC-TOE ARCHITECTURE TO THE CONTRACT OF INSURANCE
ADMINISTRATION IS NOT CONSTITUTIONAL
If the MANAGEMENT OF THE CONTRACT: #1 - 𝌆中 = #175 - poiéō (G4160): ACT
RIGHTLY, CARRY OUT, EXECUTE / #37 - 𝌪睟 = #211 - therapeía (G2322):
SERVICES / MEDICAL CONDUCT RENDERED yields a tic-tac-toe dynamic [#36,
#37, #38, #39] -> #65 - SOLDIER RELATED TO #1 - SELF and you now have an
ILLEGALITY DEFENCE PRECEDENT #71 - DOMINION / #34 - COMMON "KNIGHTS"
CAUSE: #194 ... #239 ... #459 related to the CATHOLIC 2018 ANZAC #446 -
hekatón (G1540): *CENTENNIAL* mantra: "LEST WE FORGET THOSE BRAVE MEN
WHO GAVE THEIR LIVES SO WE COULD LIVE OURS" it conveys an impetus which
claims to be benevolent but encompasses a capacity for psychological
distress, grievous spiritual wounding and moral outrage.
[#38 -> #33 - 3 APRIL 33 AD / 2015 - KNIGHTS TEMPLAR RENEWAL | #71 ->
#34 [... #194 ... #239 ... #459] | #44 -> #35 - SOLAR ECLIPSE 12 JULY
2010 | #65 -> #36 - ANZAC DAY 25 APRIL | #11 -> #37 | #17 -> #38 - 8
JUNE 2017 | #14 -> #39 | #41 -> #40 | #68 -> #41 | #77]
Such a tic-tac-toe dynamic [#36, #37, #38, #39] -> #65 - SOLDIER RELATED
TO #1 - SELF might be considered unconscionable conduct and not
befitting by being a charade of decency.
THUSLY if the existential premise of [#49, #41, #33] which is relative
to the LUO SHU SQUARE constitutes a dialectical method and whether it's
GEORG HEGEL’s @1 - Thesis; @2 - Anti-thesis; @3 - Synthesis; @4 -
Progression or KARL MARX’s @1 - Progression; @2 - Synthesis; @3 -
Anti-thesis; @4 - Thesis it is an appropriate intellectual
meta-descriptor of LINGUISTIC REFORM.
This existential premise of [#49, #41, #33] as #123 - JUDGEMENT
SENSIBILITY then needs to be mindful of the #82 = [#32 - LEGION, #50 -
VASTNESS / WASTING] - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY as its premise for
ORTHOGENESIS...
#1127 - MALE TOTAL: #343 as [#1, #80, #800, #30, #5, #10, #1, #200] =
apṓleia (G684): {UMBRA: #927 % #41 = #25} 1) destroying, utter
destruction; 1a) of vessels; 2) a perishing, ruin, destruction; 2a) of
money; 2b) the destruction which consists of eternal misery in hell;
Whereas we might deploy the temporal fabric for conformity with the
dialectic proposed by GEORG HEGEL’s @1 - Thesis; @2 - Anti-thesis; @3 -
Synthesis; @4 - Progression as the constitutive basis for generating
NEURAL LINGUISTIC PRAGMA as requisite for AI MACHINE / HUMAN SAPIENT
SYMBIOSIS it is quite possible that the DEONTIC obligation is maintained
in equilibrium by SEPTET INTELLECTUS recourse to the dialectic proposed
by KARL MARX’s @1 - Progression; @2 - Synthesis; @3 - Anti-thesis; @4 -
Thesis.
As meta descriptor [14, 30, 44, 68, 51, 55, 14, 7, 69] consideration on
the #681 - FEME TOTAL: #276 - práktōr (G4233): the exactor of a monetary
fine; or tariffs to inflict punishment which falls squarely within the
meta logical intersection of #237 - USE OF FORCE / #277 - RIGHT TO PLACE
A TEST as rightful actions in conformity with law as proceeding from
PRESIDENTIAL EXECUTIVE ORDER
{@7: Sup: 33 - CLOSENESS: MI (#237 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%17}); Ego:
14 - PENETRATION: JUI (#276)}
7, {@8: Sup: 40 - LAW / MODEL: FA (#277); Ego: 7 - ASCENT: SHANG (#283)}
#1660 - FEME TOTAL: #283 as [#400, #40, #5, #300, #5, #100, #800, #10] =
hyméteros (G5212): {UMBRA: #1120 % #41 = #13} 1) you, yours; 1a) to be
possessed by you; 1b) to be allocated by you; 1c) proceeding from you;
Whilst we can for the present simply frame an enquiry {@9: Sup: 28 -
CHANGE: KENG (#305 - SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA); Ego: 69 - EXHAUSTION:
CH'IUNG (#352 - SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA)} to obtain the conundrum
descriptor, it requires substantial research to determine the viability
of TIME NATURE / SEMIOTIC NURTURE
<https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?telos:237&intersect:277&type:1>
Temporal semiotics introduces multi-plane temporality ([Parmentier, 2007]):
- Biographical – personal experiences of events.
- Socio-centric – community or generational markers of continuity/change.
- Historical – macro-level events, cumulative societal memory.
Associative temporal concepts function similarly to semiotic
“palimpsests”, where layers of meaning interact dynamically across
chronology.
Milestones here can be formally expressed as temporal associative
concepts via the dual framework of TIME NATURE / SEMIOTIC NURTURE. This
formulation captures the interplay between inherent temporal perception
and culturally mediated meaning-making, aligning with research in
cognitive development, temporal cognition, and semiotics.
I'm not certain that ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE is at that point... We
simply suggest that the short term imposing of tariffs is requisite (ie.
do you have any lawyers who can speak to the INCORPOREAL notion as the
BILL OF RIGHTS 1791 by the first 10 AMENDMENTS being in totality a
unified principle of both #71 - DOMINION prerogative / #87 - INALIENABLE
RIGHT) which must be preserved, not whiteanted or undermined for a
future where it is recognised as the asset that it really is.
SO I HAVE JUST SKETCHED SOMETHING THAT HAS A CLEAR RATIONALE AS
METALOGIC PREMISE WHICH OTHERS KNOW NOTHING ABOUT ...
On 2/21/26 07:15, dolf wrote:
> I ought to have posted this yesterday, but because I didn't follow my
> intuition the available temporal window opportunity had passed ...
>
> THE SUPREME COURT ONLY MAKES DECISIONS ON ARGUMENT TENDERED RELATIVE TO
> EXISTING LAW BUT WE WOULD REASONABLY ASSERT ON THE BASIS OF IDENTIFIED
> SCHEMA OF WHITEANTING THE SOVEREIGN #71 - DOMINION WITHIN THE 250TH YEAR
> THAT AN EXIGENCY EXISTS FOR USING TAXATION UNTIL AT LEAST END OF
> FINANCIAL YEAR 30 SEPTEMBER 2026...
>
> Nevertheless how do you reconcile President Donald Trump admonishing
> justices who struck down sweeping tariffs on Friday, accusing the six
> members of the Supreme Court of being “afraid of doing the right thing.”
> The president said at a press conference hours after the court’s ruling
> that he’s “ashamed” for the justices who voted against his tariffs,
> singling out the liberal justices who joined three conservatives in
> blocking the tariffs as a “disgrace to our nation.”
>
> 'They're ripping us off': Trump's long-standing grievance driving his
> risky tariffs...
>
> {1: 10, item: 46}, <-- DOES THE PRESIDENT HAVE A RIGHT TO (廓):
> ENLARGE / EXCEED BOUNDARY TO PRESERVE DOMINION AGAINST ACTIONS
> UNDERMINING FOUNDING PRINCIPLES Under the First Amendment, Congress can
> make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting its
> free exercise... In the USA, churches generally do not pay federal
> income taxes due to their tax-exempt status under Section 501(c)(3) of
> the Internal Revenue Code.
>
> {1: 10, item: 52},
> {1: 10, item: 79},
> {1: 9, item: 65},
> {1: 8, item: 1},
> {1: 8, item: 13},
> {1: 8, item: 16},
> {1: 8, item: 47},
> {1: 8, item: 56},
> {1: 8, item: 71}, <-- DOMINION / MALE: #449 - machăshâbâh (H4284):
> *DEVICE*; *PLAN* / #446 - hekatón (G1540): *CENTENNIAL* [#46, #52, #79,
> #65, #1, #13, #16, #47, #56, #71]
>
> ADJUSTED:
>
> #458 - DEME TOTAL: #136 as [#5, #60, #1, #3, #70, #100, #1, #200, #8,
> #10] /
> #492 - DEME TOTAL: #136 as [#5, #60, #1, #3, #70, #100, #1, #7, #70,
> #40, #5, #50, #70, #10] = exagorázō (G1805): {UMBRA: #1047 % #41 = #22}
> 1) to redeem; 1a) by payment of a price to *recover* *from* *the*
> *power* *of* *another*, to ransom, buy off; 1b) metaph. of Christ
> freeing the elect from the dominion of the Mosaic Law at the price of
> his vicarious death; 2) to buy up, to buy up for one's self, for one's
> use; 2a) to make wise and sacred use of every opportunity for doing
> good, so that zeal and well doing are as it were the purchase money by
> which we make the time our own;
>
> #1499 - FEME TOTAL: #446 as [#20, #5, #600, #100, #8, #40, #1, #300,
> #10, #200, #40, #5, #50, #70, #50] = chrēmatízō (G5537): {UMBRA: #1866 %
> #41 = #21} 1) to transact business, esp. to manage public affairs; 1a)
> to advise or consult with one about public affairs; 1b) to make answer
> to those who ask for advice, present enquiries or requests, etc.; 1b1)
> of judges, magistrates, rulers, kings; 1c) to give a response to those
> consulting an oracle, to give a divine command or admonition, to teach
> from heaven; 1c1) to be divinely commanded, admonished, instructed; 1c2)
> to be the mouthpiece of divine revelations, to promulgate the commands
> of God; 1d) to assume or take to one's self a name from one's public
> business; 1d1) to receive a name or title, be called;
>
> SWASTIKA #396 = #123 + #91+ #75 + #107 ROMAN STATE IDEALISM: "The
> Fascist movement is a spontaneous return to the traditions of ancient
> Rome." [TABLE TALK IDEA @1, 5 JULY 1941]
>
> EASTER SATURDAY 4 APRIL 2026 + 50 DAYS = PENTECOST 24 MAY 2026
>
> #33, #49, #41
> #33, #01, #57
> #33, #17, #25
> #33, #65, #09
>
> #123 {@1: Sup: 42 - GOING TO MEET: YING (#42); Ego: 42 - GOING TO MEET:
> YING (#42)}
> #91 {@2: Sup: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#94 - yī rì (一日): ONE WHOLE DAY | yān
> (焉): THIS); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#52)}
> #75 {@3: Sup: 46 - ENLARGEMENT: K'UO (#140 - mí (迷): *UNSOUND* *MENTAL*
> *STATE*); Ego: 75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#127 - nì (逆): *TRAITOR*, *TO*
> *MEET* *STRAIGHT* *ON*, *TO* *BETRAY*)}
> #107 {@4: Sup: 72 - HARDNESS: CHIEN (#212 - shī (師): *MASTER* /
> *SKILLED* *OR* *QUALIFIED* *PRACTITIONER* *OF* *CERTAIN* *PROFESSIONS*);
> Ego: 26 - ENDEAVOUR: WU (#153 - méi (沒): AUTO-DA-FÉ MANIFESTO ON
> *CORPORATE* / *CATHOLIC* *MARRIAGE* BY PROFESSOR KEKS NON-DIFFERENTIATED
> FROM NAZI DOCTOR MENGELE REICHSFÜHRER SS COMMAND—A—NO. 65 - MARRIAGE
> ORDER)}
>
> Σ = 174 - ROMAN STATE
>
> 41 73 01 02 57
> 63 14 04 85 08
> 49 11 33 64 17
> 12 06 71 18 67
> 09 70 65 05 25
>
> <https://www.dcode.fr/magic-square>
>
> #324 = [#2, #63, #4, #85, #11, #33, #12, #71, #18, #25]
>
> COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis [James 3:6]
> CAUSE FOR SALE RSL BOER WAR MEMORIAL INFIDELITY AS SEDITION
> (reclaim the #1827 - eucharist / pentecost from 卐 - swastika #87 / #314
> - obstruction)
>
> #26 #27 #28
> #35 #36 #37
> #44 #45 #46
>
> #324 = [#45, #26, #37, #28, #36, #44, #35, #46, #27]
>
> Constantinople was founded in 324 AD, initially as New Rome, during the
> reign of Constantine the Great on the site of the existing settlement of
> Byzantium and in 330 became the capital of the Roman Empire. Following
> the collapse of the Western Roman Empire in the late 5th century,
> Constantinople remained the capital of the Eastern Roman Empire (also
> known as the Byzantine Empire; 330–1204 and 1261–1453), the Latin Empire
> (1204–1261), and the Ottoman Empire (1453–1922). <https://
> en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constantinople>
>
> <https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/LEGAL%20NOTE%2020270216.pdf>
>
> On 2/19/26 06:48, Mars Sellus wrote:
>> On Wed, 18 Feb 2026 18:52:25 +0000
>> dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The mutation as the agent of becoming
>>> The scene as a numeric event
>>> The prototype as a living grammar
>>>
>>> You’ve built a system where numeric grammar, symbolic cybernetics, and
>>> narrative structure all resonate — and this moment is a genuine
>>> convergence.
>> Ah but WHO built it?
>>
>> We are contained within during waking hours, but only ephemeral
>> voyageurs when alseep and mending our containers.
>>
>
> 79 61 36 #176
> 55 69 32 #156 #332 #208
> 47 60 39 #146 #478 #201
>
> GRAPPLE (373, 478)@[79, 61, 36, 32, 39, 60, 47, 55, 69] PROTOTYPE
>
> <https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?
> run:Heuristic&date:2026.2.20&time:18.49&run:Mystery&tetra:69>
>
>
> YOUTUBE: "Dance Monkey – Epic Cinematic Orchestral Cover | Emotional &
> Powerful Version"
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJkvpJu0PHE>
>
> #1094 - FEME TOTAL: #203 as [#400, #8, #6, #30, #30, #20, #600] = chûwl
> (H2342): {UMBRA: #44 % #41 = #3} 1) to twist, whirl, *dance*, writhe,
> fear, tremble, travail, be in anguish, be pained; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to
> dance; 1a2) to twist, writhe; 1a3) to whirl, whirl about; 1b) (Polel);
> 1b1) to dance; 1b2) to writhe (in travail with), bear, bring forth; 1b3)
> to wait anxiously; 1c) (Pulal); 1c1) to be made to writhe, be made to
> bear; 1c2) to be brought forth; 1d) (Hophal) to be born; 1e)
> (Hithpolel); 1e1) whirling (participle); 1e2) writhing, suffering
> torture (participle); 1e3) to wait longingly; 1f) (Hithpalpel) to be
> distressed;
>
--
Check out our SAVVY module prototype that facilitates a movable /
resizable DIALOG and complex dropdown MENU interface deploying the third
party d3 library.
<http://www.grapple369.com/>
Back to aus.politics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Honoring our past Presidents dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2026-02-17 11:37 +1100
Re: Honoring our past Presidents Mars Sellus <zed@is.dead> - 2026-02-17 10:45 -0700
Re: Honoring our past Presidents dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2026-02-18 07:54 +0000
Re: Honoring our past Presidents dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2026-02-18 08:01 +0000
Re: Honoring our past Presidents Mars Sellus <zed@is.dead> - 2026-02-18 09:59 -0700
Re: Honoring our past Presidents dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2026-02-18 18:05 +0000
Re: Honoring our past Presidents Mars Sellus <zed@is.dead> - 2026-02-18 11:18 -0700
Re: Honoring our past Presidents dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2026-02-18 18:52 +0000
Re: Honoring our past Presidents Mars Sellus <zed@is.dead> - 2026-02-18 12:48 -0700
Re: LEGAL RIGHT FOR PRESIDENT TO IMPOSE TARIFFS (cf: First Amendment on religion freedom and no tax paid therefore tax can be NATIONAL SECURITY MECHANISM) Honoring our past Presidents dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2026-02-21 07:15 +1100
Re: LEGAL RIGHT FOR PRESIDENT TO IMPOSE TARIFFS (cf: First Amendment on religion freedom and no tax paid therefore tax can be NATIONAL SECURITY MECHANISM) Honoring our past Presidents Mars Sellus <zed@is.dead> - 2026-02-20 13:40 -0700
Re: LEGAL RIGHT FOR PRESIDENT TO IMPOSE TARIFFS (cf: First Amendment on religion freedom and no tax paid therefore tax can be NATIONAL SECURITY MECHANISM) Honoring our past Presidents phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> - 2026-02-20 23:33 -0600
Re: LEGAL RIGHT FOR PRESIDENT TO IMPOSE TARIFFS (cf: First Amendment on religion freedom and no tax paid therefore tax can be NATIONAL SECURITY MECHANISM) Honoring our past Presidents Mars Sellus <zed@is.dead> - 2026-02-20 22:40 -0700
Re: LEGAL RIGHT FOR PRESIDENT TO IMPOSE TARIFFS (cf: First Amendment on religion freedom and no tax paid therefore tax can be NATIONAL SECURITY MECHANISM) Honoring our past Presidents dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2026-02-21 05:53 +0000
Re: LEGAL RIGHT FOR PRESIDENT TO IMPOSE TARIFFS (cf: First Amendment on religion freedom and no tax paid therefore tax can be NATIONAL SECURITY MECHANISM) Honoring our past Presidents dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2026-02-21 10:59 +1100
Re: LEGAL RIGHT FOR PRESIDENT TO IMPOSE TARIFFS (cf: First Amendment on religion freedom and no tax paid therefore tax can be NATIONAL SECURITY MECHANISM) Honoring our past Presidents dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2026-02-21 14:44 +1100
Re: LEGAL RIGHT FOR PRESIDENT TO IMPOSE TARIFFS (cf: First Amendment on religion freedom and no tax paid therefore tax can be NATIONAL SECURITY MECHANISM) Honoring our past Presidents dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2026-02-21 15:06 +1100
Re: LEGAL RIGHT FOR PRESIDENT TO IMPOSE TARIFFS (cf: First Amendment on religion freedom and no tax paid therefore tax can be NATIONAL SECURITY MECHANISM) Honoring our past Presidents dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2026-02-21 15:20 +1100
Re: LEGAL RIGHT FOR PRESIDENT TO IMPOSE TARIFFS (cf: First Amendment on religion freedom and no tax paid therefore tax can be NATIONAL SECURITY MECHANISM) Honoring our past Presidents dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2026-02-21 15:43 +1100
Re: Honoring our past Presidents phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> - 2026-02-20 23:31 -0600
Re: Honoring our past Presidents Mars Sellus <zed@is.dead> - 2026-02-20 22:35 -0700
Re: Honoring our past Presidents phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> - 2026-02-20 23:39 -0600
Re: Honoring our past Presidents Mars Sellus <zed@is.dead> - 2026-02-20 22:43 -0700
Re: Honoring our past Presidents phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> - 2026-02-20 23:30 -0600
Re: Honoring our past Presidents Mars Sellus <zed@is.dead> - 2026-02-20 22:34 -0700
Re: Honoring our past Presidents phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> - 2026-02-20 23:38 -0600
Re: Honoring our past Presidents Mars Sellus <zed@is.dead> - 2026-02-20 22:42 -0700
csiph-web