Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.conspiracy > #269117
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.conspiracy, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: 9/11 : Any Questions? |
| Date | 2015-10-05 14:33 +0000 |
| Organization | The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 |
| Message-ID | <muu1na$g67$2@pcls7.std.com> (permalink) |
| References | <4_WdnZR2vNwAOYzLnZ2dnUU7-eOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <musr85$2gb$2@pcls7.std.com> <ifydnZzpC9DI74_LnZ2dnUU7-UudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes: >"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message >news:musr85$2gb$2@pcls7.std.com... >> Subject: 9/11 : Any Questions? >> >> Not a question but a comment. Not only do kookvids lie, but kookpics do >> as well! >ROTFLMAO it is just too bad that I can say no to your hijacking and put this >thread back on course with a photo that helps prove the CGIs that rammed the >Twin Towers were cheap CGIs with no crash dynamics either. It's still a lie, kooktard. "WTC Construction nearly 2 feet thick." Nope, the exterior columns were 13.5"x14" hollow box columns. 14" is NOT "nearly 2 feet thick". The box columns were hollow, and of various thicknesses depending what they had to support. Just above the "tridents" the walls of the box columns were nearly 4" thick, but at the top they were only 1/4" thick, and of a cheaper grade of steel. Someone posted that where the planes hit they were 5/16" thick. So the planes had to smash through a total of 5/8" of steel over half the total area, and glass (which offered nearly no resistance) over the other half.
Back to alt.conspiracy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
9/11 : Any Questions? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-04 17:12 -0500
Re: 9/11 : Any Questions? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-04 23:04 +0000
Re: 9/11 : Any Questions? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-05 03:36 +0000
Re: 9/11 : Any Questions? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 07:50 -0500
Re: 9/11 : Any Questions? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-05 14:33 +0000
Re: 9/11 : Any Questions? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 10:30 -0500
Re: 9/11 : Any Questions? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-05 16:40 +0000
Re: 9/11 : Any Questions? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-05 11:10 -0400
Re: 9/11 : Any Questions? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 10:25 -0500
Re: 9/11 : Any Questions? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-05 16:32 +0000
Re: 9/11 : Any Questions? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 12:13 -0500
Re: 9/11 : Any Questions? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-05 18:19 +0000
Re: 9/11 : Any Questions? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 14:45 -0500
Re: 9/11 : Any Questions? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-05 22:57 +0000
Re: 9/11 : Any Questions? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-06 17:27 -0500
Re: 9/11 : Any Questions? dmaster <dan.woj@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-10-09 10:00 -0700
Re: 9/11 : Any Questions? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-09 17:18 -0500
Re: 9/11 : Any Questions? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 04:42 -0500
Re: 9/11 : Any Questions? Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-10-05 20:12 +0200
Re: 9/11 : Any Questions? Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-05 11:20 -0700
csiph-web