Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.conspiracy > #269187

Re: 9/11 : Any Questions?

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> writes:

>"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
>news:muuf0d$ad8$3@pcls7.std.com...

>>>and yet you still support the bullshit stories told about the 16 foot wide
>>>hole in the Pentagon?  Boy are you ever a hypocrite.
>>
>> 96' hole, not 16', kooktard.

>Before the wall fell you idiot.

That was before the collapse, kooktard.  Why do you think the collapse was
so wide, instead of 16' wide, or perhaps not at all?  It's because 96'
of aircraft debris entered the building and damaged/destroyed several
interior columns.  There's a diagram of column damage online, go search
for it.

>> Much larger jet, thinner concrete at the Pentagon.  Plus the phantom jet
>> target was on bearings which allowed it to recoil, preventing a reflected
>> tensile wave that would tend to break up concrete.  The Pentagon wall was
>> fixed to the ground/held in place by the rest of the building.

>And why the 6 minute difference then?

What 6 minute difference?  Flight 77 was much larger than a F-4 Phantom,
the Pentagon wall was thinner than a 12' thick reinforced concrete block,
which was allowed to recoil.  Thus the block survived while the Pentagon
wall got a 96' wide hole cut in it.

>And why do some stories of Flight 77 have it do a 360 degree spiral dive 
>before it gets to the Pentagon and others have it do a 270 degree turn after 
>it flies over the Pentagon?

Probably you kooktards trying to confuse the matter.  What the flight data
recorder had it doing would be the correct answer.

>And even your story does not match what Popular Mechanics said about "the 
>plane flowed into the structure in a state closer to a liquid."

Artistic license I guess (I don't consider them experts of any sort), but
upon impact the plane was no longer a solid object, it would be small 
pieces of debris or even dust which has some liquidlike properties.  Like
the F-4 Phantom, the dust "splashes" from the wall much like a liquid 
would.

>There is so much bullshit in the ever changing stories

of the kooktards.

> in an attempt to 
>explain the missing debris from the Pentagon

Very little missing debris as 95% of the plane was recovered.

> or why just one engine was 
>found it is unreal.

Do we really know this, or are you just repeating some kooksite?  Or
perhaps it hit something more solid and became fine debris.  I don't
know, and I don't trust your (mis)leading questions.

Do any non-kooktards know if both engines were recovered?

>Plus why were people filmed carrying something out of the Pentagon with a 
>tarp.

Perhaps bodies.

>  Seems they didn't want us to see that it was really a missile

That's just stupid-ass guessing, or rather kooktardery.  You have no idea
what was under any tarp there.

>stuck the Pentagon at 9:31 instead of a 757 at 9:37.  <G>

Out of the dozens and dozens of people stuck in traffic, nobody saw a
second missile/plane at 9:31.  Face it, clocks can have the wrong time, or
perhaps it was already broken and someone embellished a story saying the
impact broke it, or...

>Don't you see that you are forced to lie and lie and lie because 9/11 was a 
>lie and it doesn't matter what you think you have to use lies to support the 
>lie of 9/11.  DUH

The only lies here are from you and Bast.  And all the kookvids, which you
proved are all lies.  (Thanks again for that proof!)

>BTW I just noticed that Popular Mechanic didn't want to deal with all the 
>different CGIs used by  the 9/11 Hoaxsters that they didn't show a single 
>image of a any of the CGIs used in Nuke York City on 9/11.  <G>

Gibberish.

Back to alt.conspiracy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

9/11 : Any Questions? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-04 17:12 -0500
  Re: 9/11 : Any Questions? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-04 23:04 +0000
  Re: 9/11 : Any Questions? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-05 03:36 +0000
    Re: 9/11 : Any Questions? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 07:50 -0500
      Re: 9/11 : Any Questions? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-05 14:33 +0000
        Re: 9/11 : Any Questions? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 10:30 -0500
          Re: 9/11 : Any Questions? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-05 16:40 +0000
  Re: 9/11 : Any Questions? BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-05 11:10 -0400
    Re: 9/11 : Any Questions? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 10:25 -0500
    Re: 9/11 : Any Questions? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-05 16:32 +0000
      Re: 9/11 : Any Questions? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 12:13 -0500
        Re: 9/11 : Any Questions? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-05 18:19 +0000
          Re: 9/11 : Any Questions? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-05 14:45 -0500
            Re: 9/11 : Any Questions? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-10-05 22:57 +0000
              Re: 9/11 : Any Questions? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-06 17:27 -0500
                Re: 9/11 : Any Questions? dmaster <dan.woj@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-10-09 10:00 -0700
                Re: 9/11 : Any Questions? "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-09 17:18 -0500
      Re: 9/11 : Any Questions? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 04:42 -0500
  Re: 9/11 : Any Questions? Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-10-05 20:12 +0200
  Re: 9/11 : Any Questions? Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-05 11:20 -0700

csiph-web