Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #522603
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion |
| Date | 2015-09-21 19:53 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <mtq8r5$uud$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (13 earlier) <d8f71981-d658-4271-a401-dbf3788f503d@googlegroups.com> <mtpems$448$2@speranza.aioe.org> <3858d26c-24fb-47b4-a80c-af8eb43ee16d@googlegroups.com> <mtpqf1$2fs$1@speranza.aioe.org> <5fbe74db-a1e2-4b53-9041-0d52c5855fe5@googlegroups.com> |
On 9/21/2015 5:56 PM, john wrote: > Odd > So- what criterion are you using to > decide that hot fusion should be > funded an d cold fusion should not > be funded? > Hot fusion results are consistently corroborated by independent researchers. Cold fusion results are NOT consistently corroborated by independent researchers -- in fact, cold fusion work is positively rife with results that can't be reproduced by other researchers. This is the hallmark of fraud. What you are basing it on is how fast someone claims they can bring new science to marketable product, regardless whether they actually do that. To you, if someone CLAIMS they have an antigravity drive and will bring it to market in 5 years or less, then to you that's gold -- science in its prime. And you praise that news up one side and down the other. But claims are cheap. Faked results and "corroboration" by business partners is easy, and it is targeted at goofballs like you who are willing to say that if the government is sponsoring something different then they must be doing it for weaponry. I answered your question. Now you answer mine. What to you is the cap on time and money to be invested in a research direction before it has to produce a product or be canned? -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
ITER superconductor production nears completion Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 09:05 -0500
ITER superconductor production nears completion john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 13:03 -0700
Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 15:33 -0500
Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 19:51 -0700
Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 23:12 -0500
Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 06:54 -0500
Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 06:09 -0700
Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 06:30 -0700
Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 09:20 -0500
Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 08:08 -0700
Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 17:29 +0200
Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 18:08 +0200
Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 09:16 -0700
Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 18:29 +0200
Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 09:33 -0700
Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 18:45 +0200
Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 12:27 -0500
Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 10:46 -0700
Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 15:48 -0500
Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 15:56 -0700
Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 19:53 -0500
Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 19:42 -0700
Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 06:56 +0200
Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 06:43 -0700
Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 16:11 +0200
Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 13:56 -0700
Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 16:18 -0500
Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 14:29 -0700
Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 16:46 -0500
Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 15:50 -0700
Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 18:52 -0500
Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 17:08 -0700
Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 19:49 -0500
Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 01:10 -0400
Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 06:46 -0500
Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 01:14 -0400
Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 09:56 +0200
Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 19:04 +0200
Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 12:24 -0500
Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 17:23 +0200
Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 09:17 -0500
csiph-web