Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #522603

Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion

From Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion
Date 2015-09-21 19:53 -0500
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <mtq8r5$uud$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References (13 earlier) <d8f71981-d658-4271-a401-dbf3788f503d@googlegroups.com> <mtpems$448$2@speranza.aioe.org> <3858d26c-24fb-47b4-a80c-af8eb43ee16d@googlegroups.com> <mtpqf1$2fs$1@speranza.aioe.org> <5fbe74db-a1e2-4b53-9041-0d52c5855fe5@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 9/21/2015 5:56 PM, john wrote:
> Odd
> So- what criterion are you using to
> decide that hot fusion should be
> funded an d cold fusion should not
> be funded?
>

Hot fusion results are consistently corroborated by independent 
researchers. Cold fusion results are NOT consistently corroborated by 
independent researchers -- in fact, cold fusion work is positively rife 
with results that can't be reproduced by other researchers. This is the 
hallmark of fraud.

What you are basing it on is how fast someone claims they can bring new 
science to marketable product, regardless whether they actually do that.

To you, if someone CLAIMS they have an antigravity drive and will bring 
it to market in 5 years or less, then to you that's gold -- science in 
its prime. And you praise that news up one side and down the other. But 
claims are cheap. Faked results and "corroboration" by business partners 
is easy, and it is targeted at goofballs like you who are willing to say 
that if the government is sponsoring something different then they must 
be doing it for weaponry.

I answered your question. Now you answer mine. What to you is the cap on 
time and money to be invested in a research direction before it has to 
produce a product or be canned?

-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

ITER superconductor production nears completion Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 09:05 -0500
  ITER superconductor production nears completion john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 13:03 -0700
    Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 15:33 -0500
      Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 19:51 -0700
        Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 23:12 -0500
          Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 06:54 -0500
            Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 06:09 -0700
              Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 06:30 -0700
                Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 09:20 -0500
                Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 08:08 -0700
                Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 17:29 +0200
                Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 18:08 +0200
                Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 09:16 -0700
                Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 18:29 +0200
                Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 09:33 -0700
                Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 18:45 +0200
                Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 12:27 -0500
                Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 10:46 -0700
                Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 15:48 -0500
                Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 15:56 -0700
                Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 19:53 -0500
                Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 19:42 -0700
                Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 06:56 +0200
                Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 06:43 -0700
                Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 16:11 +0200
                Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 13:56 -0700
                Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 16:18 -0500
                Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 14:29 -0700
                Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 16:46 -0500
                Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 15:50 -0700
                Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 18:52 -0500
                Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 17:08 -0700
                Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 19:49 -0500
                Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 01:10 -0400
                Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 06:46 -0500
                Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 01:14 -0400
                Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 09:56 +0200
                Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 19:04 +0200
                Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 12:24 -0500
                Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 17:23 +0200
              Re: ITER superconductor production nears completion Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 09:17 -0500

csiph-web