Re: Nukes ( Tony has no proof of a collapse )

From	Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com>
Newsgroups	alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, sci.physics
Subject	Re: Nukes ( Tony has no proof of a collapse )
Date	2015-09-07 18:46 +0100
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<mskie8$2pi$3@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <X4-dne9otPq7S0TInZ2dnUU7-TudnZ2d@giganews.com> <mrcu9r$squ$2@dont-email.me> <P76dnal9k4MwiUfInZ2dnUU7-e2dnZ2d@giganews.com> <mrdaj7$hn4$3@dont-email.me> <W_Kdna8vXd4f3XDInZ2dnUU7-fOdnZ2d@giganews.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 07/09/2015 08:47, Rocky wrote:
> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:mrdaj7$hn4$3@dont-email.me...
>> On 23/08/2015 19:46, Rocky wrote:
>>> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
>>> news:mrcu9r$squ$2@dont-email.me...
> < snip >
>>> Look at you, you can't prove it was a collapse or a CD
>>
>> Why would I want to prove it was a CD?
>
> I'm just poking fun at the fact that you have no proof of either one because
> the crime scene photos don't support a collapse or a CD.  <G>
>

You're not doing a very good job then.

>>> Dimitri Khalezov - WTC Nuclear Demolition [Complete / Full Length]
>>>    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lec9giab90I
>>>
>>>
>>>>> Oh, and I just saw this too:
>>>>>
>>>>> NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence: Step 1
>>>>>     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvCuMULutHs
>>>
>>> Oddly enough it is SOP for you to skip over evidence that proves not only
>>> did the media lie to us but so did NIST.
>
> BTW incase you missed it the way excess radiation from GZ went undetected
> was they sent samples to another area completely


You have proof of this, please provide it.

> and they probably sat for a
> long enough time that any excess radiation decreased in amount before the
> samples were actually looked at.
>

Well we had better add 'half life' to the things you nothing about.
But in case I'm wrong, what was the half life of this radiation?
What sort of radiation was it?


> And I'm sure the people that collected the samples knew enough not to take
> them from anywhere near the molten metal under WTC3, WTC4 and WTC7.
>
> Rocky
>
>


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

Thread

Re: Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 09:17 -0500
  Re: Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 18:03 +0100
    Re: Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 13:46 -0500
      Re: Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 21:33 +0100
        Re: Nukes ( Tony has no proof of a collapse ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 02:47 -0500
          Re: Rocky's imagined nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-07 15:14 +0000
          Re: Nukes ( Tony has no proof of a collapse ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-07 18:46 +0100
      Re: Nukes je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 13:33 -0700
        2 je suis charly (was: Nukes) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 15:53 -0500
          Re: 2 je suis charly (was: Nukes) je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 14:32 -0700
            Re: 2 je suis charly (was: Nukes) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 16:59 -0500
          Re: 2 je suis charly Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 23:16 +0100
          Re: 2 je suis charly gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 20:14 -0500
  Re: Nukes gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 15:37 -0500
    Re: Re: Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 19:41 -0500
      Re: Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 03:53 -0500
  Re: Nukes collapse videos could be all bogus "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 17:00 -0500

csiph-web