Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #362641
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Time is absolute not relative |
| Date | 2015-09-01 09:42 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <ms4dgg$c7q$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <d88cd3b3-f2f4-4ea3-b99e-de9e4730dcbb@googlegroups.com> <Yumdnar22aPsFHjInZ2dnUU7_82dnZ2d@giganews.com> <2105a113-72e7-483b-a885-cbffe3d43bfb@googlegroups.com> <ms4bdc$6i7$1@speranza.aioe.org> <3a9dfa3f-635d-438c-9044-8261eb56d2e0@googlegroups.com> |
On 9/1/2015 9:16 AM, kenseto wrote: > On Tuesday, September 1, 2015 at 10:06:40 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 9/1/2015 9:03 AM, kenseto wrote: >>> The LT does not require two synched clocks in each frame. It predicts the rate >>> of a single moving clock compared to the rate of the observer's clock >>> and the result is 1/gamma. BTW there is no such thing as an inertial frame on earth. >> >> Every one of these three sentence is flat wrong. > > They are wrong according to your failed theory of SR. They are correct according to IRT. > Well, you made a statement about the Lorentz transforms. The Lorentz transforms belong to SR and IRT can't have them. The statement you made about the Lorentz transforms of SR is flat wrong. And if IRT is going to make the statement that there is no such thing as an inertial frame on earth, then IRT is a bag of nonsense. -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Time is absolute not relative Basti05b@aol.com - 2015-08-27 04:52 -0700
Re: Time is absolute not relative Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-27 05:13 -0700
Re: Time is absolute not relative Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-08-29 13:27 +0200
Re: Time is absolute not relative Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-29 05:09 -0700
Re: Time is absolute not relative mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-08-29 23:33 -0700
Re: Time is absolute not relative Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-30 05:04 -0700
Re: Time is absolute not relative mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-08-30 08:28 -0700
Re: Time is absolute not relative kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-08-30 08:45 -0700
Re: Time is absolute not relative Reginald Ehrett <chasi@competence.org> - 2015-08-30 15:49 +0000
Re: Time is absolute not relative Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-08-30 01:11 +0200
Re: Time is absolute not relative kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-08-30 09:06 -0700
Re: Time is absolute not relative rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 09:51 -0700
Re: Time is absolute not relative mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-08-30 12:35 -0700
Re: Time is absolute not relative Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-30 16:27 -0500
Re: Time is absolute not relative mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-08-30 23:09 -0700
Re: Time is absolute not relative mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-08-30 23:31 -0700
Re: Time is absolute not relative Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-31 10:58 -0500
Re: Time is absolute not relative Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-08-31 20:51 +0200
Re: Time is absolute not relative Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-08-31 21:11 -0500
Re: Time is absolute not relative John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-31 19:17 -0700
Re: Time is absolute not relative Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-09-01 08:37 +0200
Re: Time is absolute not relative Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-09-01 06:11 -0500
Re: Time is absolute not relative Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-09-01 15:10 +0200
Re: Time is absolute not relative Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 22:40 -0700
Re: Time is absolute not relative Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 23:50 -0700
Re: Time is absolute not relative Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 08:20 -0500
Re: Time is absolute not relative mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-09-01 22:57 -0700
Re: Time is absolute not relative paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 05:46 -0700
Re: Time is absolute not relative mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-09-02 06:03 -0700
Re: Time is absolute not relative paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 09:24 -0700
Re: Time is absolute not relative kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-02 13:01 -0400
Re: Time is absolute not relative Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-09-02 21:04 +0200
Re: Time is absolute not relative kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-08-31 20:49 -0700
Re: Time is absolute not relative kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-01 01:48 -0400
Re: Time is absolute not relative Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-09-01 06:28 -0500
Re: Time is absolute not relative kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-01 09:12 -0400
Re: Time is absolute not relative Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-01 07:54 -0700
Re: Time is absolute not relative kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-09-01 06:25 -0700
Re: Time is absolute not relative kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-09-01 06:36 -0700
Re: Time is absolute not relative kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-01 14:20 -0400
Re: Time is absolute not relative Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-09-01 06:18 -0500
Re: Time is absolute not relative kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-09-01 07:03 -0700
Re: Time is absolute not relative Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 09:06 -0500
Re: Time is absolute not relative kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-09-01 07:16 -0700
Re: Time is absolute not relative Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 09:42 -0500
Re: Time is absolute not relative kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-09-01 10:20 -0700
Re: Time is absolute not relative Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-01 10:34 -0700
Re: Time is absolute not relative Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 12:37 -0500
Re: Time is absolute not relative kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-09-02 08:07 -0700
Re: Time is absolute not relative Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 12:49 -0500
Re: Time is absolute not relative kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-09-02 07:13 -0700
Re: Time is absolute not relative kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-02 13:05 -0400
Re: Time is absolute not relative Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 12:47 -0500
Re: Time is absolute not relative kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-09-02 13:07 -0700
Re: Time is absolute not relative Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 15:28 -0500
Re: Time is absolute not relative Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2015-09-01 12:41 -0500
Re: Time is absolute not relative kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-09-02 08:45 -0700
Re: Time is absolute not relative Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 22:46 -0700
Re: Time is absolute not relative Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 23:28 -0700
Re: Time is absolute not relative Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-09-01 15:53 +0200
Re: Time is absolute not relative Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 23:26 -0700
Re: Time is absolute not relative rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 16:58 -0700
Re: Time is absolute not relative John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-30 21:06 -0700
Re: Time is absolute not relative YBM <ybmess@nooos.fr.invalid> - 2015-08-31 09:41 -0300
Re: Time is absolute not relative John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-30 21:13 -0700
Re: Time is absolute not relative rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 21:18 -0700
Re: Time is absolute not relative John Gogo <jfgogo22@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-30 21:53 -0700
Re: Time is absolute not relative Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 22:01 -0700
Re: Time is absolute not relative rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 11:24 -0700
Re: Time is absolute not relative mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-08-30 22:53 -0700
Re: Time is absolute not relative rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 11:30 -0700
Time is absolute not relative bruntlybunky <bruntlybunky@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 18:43 -0700
csiph-web