Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #359516
| From | Bohuš Matuška <bohu@paranetnet.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: BRIAN COX DISHONEST OR JUST SILLY? |
| Date | 2015-08-03 15:19 +0000 |
| Organization | Service Informatique SI Inc |
| Message-ID | <mpo0ph$cu5$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <631faed3-80d1-4960-a474-cef1a1a2b8cc@googlegroups.com> <4850f232-9a3b-46e1-b730-c792e909f78c@googlegroups.com> |
rotchm wrote: > On Monday, August 3, 2015 at 6:44:15 AM UTC-4, Pentcho Valev wrote: >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-O8lBIcHre0 >> Brian Cox (2:25) : "Moving clocks run slowly" >> >> They don't. ... "Moving clocks run slowly" still remains a false >> statement. > > Idiot pintcho, words have meaning in context. True that Moving clocks > dont run slow. But in the context of the clip, for the dedicated > audience, "Moving clocks run slowly" is "ok". You definitely have a > reading and comprehension problem. What do you mean by "dedicated audience"? Not calling the audience "stupid", right? >> However, if the single clock is stationary and the multiple clocks >> moving, Einstein's 1905 constant-speed-of-light postulate entails that >> this time the STATIONARY CLOCK SHOWS LESS AND LESS TIME ELAPSED than >> the multiple moving clocks. Clearly Einstein's relativity is an >> inconsistency > > Nope. In both cases, the moving clocks "run slow" (in the sense that, > they "tick slower", even if the moving ones here have a bigger value. > Can you figure out why? You are so wrong. No clocks, ever, can run slower. Pentcho is perfectly right.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
BRIAN COX DISHONEST OR JUST SILLY? Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-03 03:44 -0700
Re: BRIAN COX DISHONEST OR JUST SILLY? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-03 07:32 -0400
Re: BRIAN COX DISHONEST OR JUST SILLY? Bohuš Matuška <bohu@paranetnet.net> - 2015-08-03 15:53 +0000
Re: BRIAN COX DISHONEST OR JUST SILLY? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-03 14:03 -0400
Re: BRIAN COX DISHONEST OR JUST SILLY? Bohuš Matuška <bohu@paranetnet.net> - 2015-08-03 19:23 +0000
Re: BRIAN COX DISHONEST OR JUST SILLY? rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 05:50 -0700
Re: BRIAN COX DISHONEST OR JUST SILLY? Bohuš Matuška <bohu@paranetnet.net> - 2015-08-03 15:19 +0000
Re: BRIAN COX DISHONEST OR JUST SILLY? Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2015-08-03 22:25 +0200
Re: BRIAN COX DISHONEST OR JUST SILLY? rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 13:51 -0700
Re: BRIAN COX DISHONEST OR JUST SILLY? Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-03 07:19 -0700
Re: BRIAN COX DISHONEST OR JUST SILLY? rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 07:28 -0700
Re: BRIAN COX DISHONEST OR JUST SILLY? Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-03 12:00 -0700
PENTCHO VALEV DISHONEST AND JUST SILLY Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-03 12:04 -0700
csiph-web