Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #359548
| From | Bohuš Matuška <bohu@paranetnet.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: BRIAN COX DISHONEST OR JUST SILLY? |
| Date | 2015-08-03 19:23 +0000 |
| Organization | Service Informatique SI Inc |
| Message-ID | <mpof2o$ef6$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <631faed3-80d1-4960-a474-cef1a1a2b8cc@googlegroups.com> <0sjuraphcnva2q1nv43lj3a6vmb8ae6g0k@4ax.com> <mpo2po$hrc$1@speranza.aioe.org> <dt9vra1gqnhfqmd0fup75re9q1m6d38ja9@4ax.com> |
kefischer wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 15:53:28 +0000 (UTC), Bohu¹ Matu¹ka
> <bohu@paranetnet.net> wrote:
>
>>kefischer wrote:
>>
>>> Idiot, it is not "moving" that causes the relative
>>> elapsed time, it is arriving at a destination in less time than Newton
>>> predicts.
>>
>>So you imply an "arriving" without motion "moving". How is this possible
>>according to the divergent matter model?
>
> Stop faking the language problem, TROLL,
> obviously there is motion in the trip, but that motion is not what
> causes the difference in clock readings.
> Going faster (in the Divergent Matter model)
> means the quicker you get there, the less the Earth has expanded, so the
> trip was not as long as it would be at slower speeds.
This is great. Right?
> In space (in the model), massive bodies
> have to be moving apart at high velocity to avoid expanding into each
> other, which has nothing to do with space itself.
> Examination of actual experiments is
> needed in some cases in order to understand what happens, that has been
> done in some cases, not in others.
Hmm?
> The clocks in Paris run at the same
> rate as the ones in Denver, so the effect should show up in that one-way
> trip.
Escapes me. They never meet.
> Divergent Matter uses "rational physics",
> from the first thought of the floor accelerating upward, to the fact
> that "gravitational forces" acting at a distance DO NOT EXIST,
> and there is NO SUCH THING as gravitational mass.
What is the acceleration in the divergent matter model, as different from
the Newtonian model?
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
BRIAN COX DISHONEST OR JUST SILLY? Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-03 03:44 -0700
Re: BRIAN COX DISHONEST OR JUST SILLY? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-03 07:32 -0400
Re: BRIAN COX DISHONEST OR JUST SILLY? Bohuš Matuška <bohu@paranetnet.net> - 2015-08-03 15:53 +0000
Re: BRIAN COX DISHONEST OR JUST SILLY? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-08-03 14:03 -0400
Re: BRIAN COX DISHONEST OR JUST SILLY? Bohuš Matuška <bohu@paranetnet.net> - 2015-08-03 19:23 +0000
Re: BRIAN COX DISHONEST OR JUST SILLY? rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 05:50 -0700
Re: BRIAN COX DISHONEST OR JUST SILLY? Bohuš Matuška <bohu@paranetnet.net> - 2015-08-03 15:19 +0000
Re: BRIAN COX DISHONEST OR JUST SILLY? Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2015-08-03 22:25 +0200
Re: BRIAN COX DISHONEST OR JUST SILLY? rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 13:51 -0700
Re: BRIAN COX DISHONEST OR JUST SILLY? Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-03 07:19 -0700
Re: BRIAN COX DISHONEST OR JUST SILLY? rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 07:28 -0700
Re: BRIAN COX DISHONEST OR JUST SILLY? Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-03 12:00 -0700
PENTCHO VALEV DISHONEST AND JUST SILLY Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-03 12:04 -0700
csiph-web