Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #358166
| From | Heraklesr Stathakis <hsp@amphiaraus.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 |
| Date | 2015-07-22 11:43 +0000 |
| Organization | Investissements Maple Leaf Limitee |
| Message-ID | <monvk7$pge$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (9 earlier) <d10hbdFbva0U1@mid.individual.net> <mog6t4$63r$4@speranza.aioe.org> <mog9ae$e3k$1@speranza.aioe.org> <mog9ff$e3k$2@speranza.aioe.org> <d1631hFo48bU1@mid.individual.net> |
Thomas Heger wrote: >>>> It's a lovely theory, you should read up on it. With a book, not a >>>> newspaper article. Not appropriate to go into it in detail here. >>> >>> Bullshit, the evolution is nothing, much less a theory. It takes much >>> more to become a theory, which is not even that. >>> >>> It is because people forget what an organism is, be that whatever. Ie >>> a human is nothing but a community of about 50 trillions distinct >>> cells and 50 trillions likewise bacteria, give or take. >>> >>> This would be a 1st order. Any of each is nothing but logical >>> information and complex machinery. Thus, is all about Physics, >>> Chemistry and Data Structures. >> >> Actually also about the running Algorithms, which appear to be more >> essential then all the others. >> >> Thus, is all about Physics, Chemistry, Algorithms and Data Structures. > > No. > As far as this is known, nature does not 'think' in algorithms, but uses > mainly simultaneous and massive parallel acting 'machinery'. Learn what cells and many other things stands for, cretin.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 chanrasjid@gmail.com - 2015-07-16 09:32 -0700
Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-07-16 22:20 +0200
Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 underante <underante@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-16 13:40 -0700
Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-07-18 08:05 +0200
Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 chanrasjid@gmail.com - 2015-07-18 13:47 -0700
Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-07-19 05:00 +0200
Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-07-19 04:45 +0200
Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 Heraklesr Stathakis <hsp@amphiaraus.org> - 2015-07-22 11:43 +0000
csiph-web