Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #357463

Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005

From Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005
Date 2015-07-16 22:20 +0200
Message-ID <d0qi15Frc20U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <8350e796-2d4a-4aa1-94f4-d678ab16d6ec@googlegroups.com> <8e136ff0-bc42-499e-bf9c-804b206f52a1@googlegroups.com> <a1fb1568-2818-4107-b7b1-b890ea06f20f@googlegroups.com> <797da0b1-10e9-4b83-8db7-eb0eb0bf5b1e@googlegroups.com> <008e10dd-8e9f-46cf-9b6e-4b585cb36b23@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Am 16.07.2015 18:32, schrieb chanrasjid@gmail.com:
..
>> did they take a similar poll on the theory of evolution as well?
>
> I have no knowledge. I actually do not read Chinese myself. The relativity poll is from an article by one of their scientist.
>
> I doubt there is much dispute in evolution theory with the Chinese. Again it is only an issue in the West - whether man was created in the image of God or moulded originally as monkeys.
>
> The Chinese, being practical, probably could not see how else very high life forms could be created - but through slow changes according to the workings of the Great Mystery.
>
> Was not the Chinese the originator of evolution theory - in the I Ching, Book of Changes; everthing under the Heavens develop through slow changes over time.

The problem is not evolution, but the person Darwin.

I had - for example - the idea, that certain structures in the Atacama 
desert are actually remains of people, that have lived there, while the 
desert was still a sea.

This area dried out about 15 million years ago. So there should have 
been beings, that have been able to build cities that long ago.

But Darwin assumed an age of the Earth of about 300,000 years, hence is 
off by four orders of magnitude.

This is an extreme discrepancy, so his theories should be treated with care.

Other believe systems assume the creation of men exactly 6000 years ago 
(plus a few days), because they found this number in the bible.

Possibly people are way older than this and lived on this planet for 
several hundred million years (says e.g. a guy named Ed Conrad).

Now: who's right?



TH

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 chanrasjid@gmail.com - 2015-07-16 09:32 -0700
  Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-07-16 22:20 +0200
    Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 underante <underante@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-16 13:40 -0700
    Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-07-18 08:05 +0200
      Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 chanrasjid@gmail.com - 2015-07-18 13:47 -0700
        Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-07-19 05:00 +0200
      Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-07-19 04:45 +0200
        Re: The Chinese poll on Einstein's relativity theories - 2005 Heraklesr Stathakis <hsp@amphiaraus.org> - 2015-07-22 11:43 +0000

csiph-web