Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #357582

Re: EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY OR QUANTUM MECHANICS?

From Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY OR QUANTUM MECHANICS?
Date 2015-07-17 07:14 -0500
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <moaris$3gg$2@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References (21 earlier) <d0os2vFdmacU1@mid.individual.net> <mo8cik$mu8$1@speranza.aioe.org> <d0qirqFrj1eU1@mid.individual.net> <mo997o$im$1@speranza.aioe.org> <d0r0m2Fb0nU1@mid.individual.net>

Show all headers | View raw


On 7/16/2015 7:30 PM, Thomas Heger wrote:
> Am 16.07.2015 23:55, schrieb Odd Bodkin:
> ..
>>>
>>> My impression:
>>>
>>> there is a second science, that is developed behind closed curtains and
>>> the official nonsense is for the stupid public.
>>>
>>> To keep the general public stupid, there is nonsense produced and hailed
>>> as greatest achievement of mankind.
>>>
>>> To educate the producers of nonsense and to keep the secrets secret,
>>> there is brainwashing used. This is commonly not called 'brainwashing',
>>> but 'higher education' in what is called 'university'.
>>>
>>> The Voodoo-high-priests of such education carefully select the initiates
>>> into the 'inner sanctum' (the science behind the curtain), if they are
>>> smart enough, but not too smart. Also a few courses in witchcraft and
>>> alchemy are than mandatory. And if the candidate is doing still well, he
>>> could eventually peep into 'real science'.
>>>
>>> If non-selected do similar, they got struck by lightning, sent out by
>>> the Harry Potters of Cornell.
>>>
>>>
>>> TH
>>
>>
>> This is just bat-shit crazy.
>>
>> So, according to you, once someone enters the Hallowed Halls of
>> University Science, they must sign a pact that upon penalty of death,
>> they will never reveal the secrets of The Cult. And nobody has escaped
>> that Cult, and nobody has tried.
>
> Well, the members of such a 'cult' would certainly get in trouble, if
> they reveal certain secrets.

What kind of trouble would they get in?

And if one of the Cult were to get disenchanted and were to defect? What 
kind of trouble would he get into for revealing the secrets?

>
> But that is not about science as we know it, but about the hidden
> secrets, not meant to be known by the general public.
>
> Certainly you may live a scientific life without ever getting in any
> kind of contact with such secrets.
>
> But there are other mechanisms, like who is hired into a job and who is
> not, what make people observe invisible rules. So, if SRT is one of
> these things, you may not put into doubt without risking the job, then
> most scientists would never do.
>
> In my eyes there are certain subjects, that have such 'protection
> against critique': 'global warming' for example or 'big-bang cosmology'.
>
> Other subjects (apparently) should be avoided, like gyroscopes or
> certain features of water.
>
> And we seemingly have kind of competition, to create the most obscure
> theories, that have the most unjustified assumptions and the most
> difficult methods used.
>
> Those are than presented as 'gold standard' of science and as most
> advanced representation of such obviously successful endeavour as physics.
>
> TH
>
>
>


-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY OR QUANTUM MECHANICS? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-07-13 07:29 +0200
  Re: EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY OR QUANTUM MECHANICS? shuba <tim@sh.uba> - 2015-07-13 07:35 +0000
    Re: EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY OR QUANTUM MECHANICS? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-07-14 22:04 +0200
      Re: EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY OR QUANTUM MECHANICS? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-07-14 15:18 -0500
        Re: EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY OR QUANTUM MECHANICS? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-07-15 05:00 +0200
          Re: EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY OR QUANTUM MECHANICS? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-15 03:52 -0700
          Re: EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY OR QUANTUM MECHANICS? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-07-16 22:34 +0200
            Re: EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY OR QUANTUM MECHANICS? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-07-16 17:03 -0400
            Re: EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY OR QUANTUM MECHANICS? underante <underante@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-16 14:14 -0700
            Re: EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY OR QUANTUM MECHANICS? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-07-17 02:30 +0200
              Re: EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY OR QUANTUM MECHANICS? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 07:14 -0500
                Re: EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY OR QUANTUM MECHANICS? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-07-18 07:43 +0200
      Re: EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY OR QUANTUM MECHANICS? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-07-14 16:19 -0400

csiph-web