Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #357480

Re: EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY OR QUANTUM MECHANICS?

From kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY OR QUANTUM MECHANICS?
Message-ID <bv6gqa1709l0eab4e6h9d7j00a56nvfv2a@4ax.com> (permalink)
References (8 earlier) <d0nsf1F6gmnU1@mid.individual.net> <mo6fo8$ptc$1@speranza.aioe.org> <d0os2vFdmacU1@mid.individual.net> <mo8cik$mu8$1@speranza.aioe.org> <d0qirqFrj1eU1@mid.individual.net>
Organization Forte - www.forteinc.com
Date 2015-07-16 17:03 -0400

Show all headers | View raw


On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 22:34:59 +0200, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote:

>Am 16.07.2015 15:45, schrieb Odd Bodkin:
>
>>> So I try to discuss a certain subset of physical problems and that is -
>>> among others - 'Growing Earth'.
>>>
>>> Other subjects have been Earthquakes, SRT, the idea of particles, the
>>> standard model of cosmology, CMBR and a few others.
>>
>> Note that all of those are PHYSICAL THEORIES, with all the components a
>> physical theory requires.
>>
>>>
>>> All of these discussions failed, (like this one failed).
>>>
>>> Reason: in my impression the system of education in physics is kind of
>>> 'voodoo' and efficiently brainwashes otherwise sane minds of young man
>>> (plus a few women) into believing, what their voodoo-priests tell them.
>>
>> I disagree. I think what it requires is some background training in the
>> subject you are not familiar with. I think there are a lot of people who
>> do not want to have to deal with that background training before being
>> able to talk competently about that subject matter, because they are
>> lazy. And so these people dismiss and disparage the value of that
>> background training, calling it "brainwashing" or "religious training"
>> or "zombie hypnosis" or other ridiculous things. When, in fact, it is
>> just EDUCATION. Education that these people find too much of a burden to
>> take on.
>
>
>My impression:
>
>there is a second science, that is developed behind closed curtains and 
>the official nonsense is for the stupid public.
>
>To keep the general public stupid, there is nonsense produced and hailed 
>as greatest achievement of mankind.
>
>To educate the producers of nonsense and to keep the secrets secret, 
>there is brainwashing used. This is commonly not called 'brainwashing', 
>but 'higher education' in what is called 'university'.
>
>The Voodoo-high-priests of such education carefully select the initiates 
>into the 'inner sanctum' (the science behind the curtain), if they are 
>smart enough, but not too smart. Also a few courses in witchcraft and 
>alchemy are than mandatory. And if the candidate is doing still well, he 
>could eventually peep into 'real science'.
>
>If non-selected do similar, they got struck by lightning, sent out by 
>the Harry Potters of Cornell.
>
>TH

         Are you by any chance a child raised
in Soviet Germany?

         I suppose that could cause an insane distrust.




Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY OR QUANTUM MECHANICS? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-07-13 07:29 +0200
  Re: EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY OR QUANTUM MECHANICS? shuba <tim@sh.uba> - 2015-07-13 07:35 +0000
    Re: EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY OR QUANTUM MECHANICS? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-07-14 22:04 +0200
      Re: EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY OR QUANTUM MECHANICS? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-07-14 15:18 -0500
        Re: EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY OR QUANTUM MECHANICS? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-07-15 05:00 +0200
          Re: EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY OR QUANTUM MECHANICS? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-15 03:52 -0700
          Re: EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY OR QUANTUM MECHANICS? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-07-16 22:34 +0200
            Re: EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY OR QUANTUM MECHANICS? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-07-16 17:03 -0400
            Re: EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY OR QUANTUM MECHANICS? underante <underante@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-16 14:14 -0700
            Re: EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY OR QUANTUM MECHANICS? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-07-17 02:30 +0200
              Re: EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY OR QUANTUM MECHANICS? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 07:14 -0500
                Re: EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY OR QUANTUM MECHANICS? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-07-18 07:43 +0200
      Re: EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY OR QUANTUM MECHANICS? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-07-14 16:19 -0400

csiph-web