Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption...

From	"Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c
Subject	Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption...
Date	2015-07-08 12:10 -0700
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<mnjsk1$1pg$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(3 earlier) <bk5ppahds6st5l08opjbffkuopsdq0e1b5@4ax.com> <mnid9r$g0i$1@speranza.aioe.org> <mnj1t4$77o$1@dont-email.me> <mnjp2c$o9r$1@speranza.aioe.org> <559D7019.9060406@verizon.net>

Show all headers | View raw

>"James Kuyper"  wrote in message news:559D7019.9060406@verizon.net...

>>On 07/08/2015 02:10 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>> "James Kuyper"  wrote in message news:mnj1t4$77o$1@dont-email.me...
...
>>> Keep in mind that the only thing that matters, as far as decryption is
>>> concerned, is that there is a pattern to your key.
>>
>> Absolutely correct. For some reason, I still think that it
>> might be kind of difficult to find the actual formula that
>> created the key in the first place. IMVHO, finding the key
>> would be the easy part!
>>
>> Once you have worked, used computing power, to find the key,
>> well, why not try to find the formula that created the key
>> for fun?

>Because that formula is not unique. I've a strong background in math and
>science, and that background tells me that there can be many different
>ways of expressing the same thing.

Ahhh. Well, that sort of implies that there is more than
z = z^2 + c that can create the Mset, along with all of
its antennae. There has been much work in the field wrt
deriving an iterated function system that can reproduce
the Mset. So far, none have worked. The code I posted uses
Julia sets which do have workable inverses for different powers:

http://www.fractalforums.com/ifs-iterated-function-systems/julia-set-inverse-iteration

However, the Mset is a different story! Julias have that
nice constant point property. The Mset has a unique point
for each point of escape time iteration. Therefore the
inverse of a Mset seems like a major PITA.  Yikes!

;^o

BTW, I need to ponder the rest of your post to give a proper response James.

Thanks.

:^)

Thread

Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-07-07 17:08 -0700
  Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-07-08 01:12 +0100
    Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-07-07 17:19 -0700
      Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-07 22:29 -0500
        Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-07-07 22:43 -0700
          Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-08 03:23 -0500
          Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-07-08 07:36 -0400
            Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-07-08 12:52 +0100
            Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-07-08 11:10 -0700
              Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-07-08 14:46 -0400
                Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-07-08 12:10 -0700
                Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-07-08 20:41 +0100
                Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-07-09 09:55 -0700
                Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-07-09 11:18 -0700
                Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-07-09 19:25 +0100
                Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-07-09 13:49 -0700
                Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-07-09 22:09 +0100
      Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-07-08 00:49 -0700
  Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-07-07 23:05 -0700
    Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-07-07 23:15 -0700
  Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-07-10 12:25 -0700
    Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-07-10 15:09 -0700
    Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-07-15 15:52 +0100
    Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-07-31 13:40 -0700
      Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-07-31 13:43 -0700
        Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-07-31 13:46 -0700
      Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-08-21 14:45 -0700
        Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-08-22 01:29 +0100
          Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-08-21 20:03 -0700
            Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-08-22 13:02 +0100
              Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-08-22 18:15 -0700
    Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-08-16 12:10 -0700
      Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 22:49 -0700

csiph-web