Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.raspberry-pi > #8937
| From | rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.raspberry-pi |
| Subject | Re: 4.41 inch ePaper Display for the rPi |
| Date | 2015-06-19 22:44 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <mm2jv4$fop$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <mm1pea$n1o$1@dont-email.me> <mm1qp7$1d9$1@dont-email.me> <mm1uh7$45i$1@dont-email.me> <mm22c9$sfv$1@dont-email.me> <mm2aak$8gf$2@dont-email.me> |
On 6/19/2015 7:58 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote: > On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 17:43:50 -0400, rickman wrote: > >> This points to another short coming in the ePaper info. What is >> different about the displays used in eReaders and the displays Pervasive >> sells? >> > Might the Kobo use a faster, more capable controller? > > I wonder how much the update speed is affected by the transfer rate. I can assure you the limitation has nothing to do with the controller. It has to be in the display as it would be very easy to design a controller that would be *much* faster than a 1 second update. The HDMI interface you mention supports 60 Hz updates at full HD resolution. That's just not the limitation. > Off the top of my head, if you're sending every pixel down an SPI > connection uploading changes to the controller will be relatively slow, Why? There are 120,000 pixels. At 20 MHz the SPI can support 166 updates per second. > but IIRC pixel flipping is a physical process, and so is also pretty > slow. I'd guess a cheap bit-serial controller would be rate-limited by > pixel flipping rather than the SPI transfer rate, but what do I know. A > full refresh on that 2.7" display is taking about 30 uS to set a pixel, > so how does that compare with normal SPI transfer rates? > > Would I be wrong to expect a more complex and expensive controller, which > might accept byte-wide uploads over some sort of parallel interface, > could speed up the overall refresh by flipping several pixels in parallel > or at least double buffer the uploads so it could accept uploads in > parallel with pixel flipping. None of this is a controller limitation. That is all determined by the display. I don't know for sure, but I think the larger displays are divided into multiple sections that work in parallel. Otherwise the 10" display would be more than four times slower than the 4.41" display. The 7 and 10 inchers even have two connectors. No point in speculating. If I can't get the info on rolling my own controller, I am probably drop the ePaper thing for another couple of years until they get their act together. -- Rick
Back to comp.sys.raspberry-pi | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: 4.41 inch ePaper Display for the rPi Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-06-18 22:39 +0000
Re: 4.41 inch ePaper Display for the rPi Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-06-19 19:10 +0000
Re: 4.41 inch ePaper Display for the rPi rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-06-19 15:34 -0400
Re: 4.41 inch ePaper Display for the rPi Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-06-19 20:36 +0000
Re: 4.41 inch ePaper Display for the rPi Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-06-19 23:22 +0000
Re: 4.41 inch ePaper Display for the rPi Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-06-19 23:58 +0000
Re: 4.41 inch ePaper Display for the rPi hamilton <hamilton@nothere.com> - 2015-06-19 18:25 -0600
Re: 4.41 inch ePaper Display for the rPi rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-06-19 22:44 -0400
Re: 4.41 inch ePaper Display for the rPi rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-06-20 13:29 -0400
Re: 4.41 inch ePaper Display for the rPi cl@isbd.net - 2015-07-29 10:26 +0100
Re: 4.41 inch ePaper Display for the rPi cl@isbd.net - 2015-07-29 21:21 +0100
Re: 4.41 inch ePaper Display for the rPi rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-07-29 17:18 -0400
Re: 4.41 inch ePaper Display for the rPi cl@isbd.net - 2015-07-30 10:23 +0100
Re: 4.41 inch ePaper Display for the rPi Rob <nomail@example.com> - 2015-07-30 11:14 +0000
Re: 4.41 inch ePaper Display for the rPi Dom <domafp@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2015-07-30 12:55 +0100
Re: 4.41 inch ePaper Display for the rPi cl@isbd.net - 2015-07-30 13:15 +0100
Re: 4.41 inch ePaper Display for the rPi Theo Markettos <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2015-06-19 20:27 +0100
Re: 4.41 inch ePaper Display for the rPi rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-06-19 15:57 -0400
Re: 4.41 inch ePaper Display for the rPi Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-06-19 19:31 +0000
csiph-web