Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #28073
| From | Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: Calling constructor function with or without new |
| Date | 2015-06-10 14:57 -0300 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <ml9tr3$k9v$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <1856630.MTooSpn00h@PointedEars.de> <ml7ppg$uhn$1@speranza.aioe.org> <1539352.pOhnpQ6Ohf@PointedEars.de> <ml9r84$cqq$1@speranza.aioe.org> <2115940.9N3qDlgpqz@PointedEars.de> |
Thomas Lahn wrote: > Joao Rodrigues wrote: > >> Thomas Lahn wrote: >> >> [truisms] > > I have only reworded there what I had written before; the meaning of it has > not changed a bit. You never come clean, don't you? No, you have changed your initial meaning of normative by rephrasing your speech and amusingly deleting the "non-normative" nonsense. > How strange that you can agree with this so much that > you call it “truisms”, Agreed only with the truism on how Ecma operates. > but found it necessary to be impolite in your reply > to what I had written before. > That's exactly what you do most of the time with everyone on this NG. -- Joao Rodrigues
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Calling constructor function with or without new Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2015-06-08 00:08 +1000
Re: Calling constructor function with or without new Martin Honnen <mahotrash@yahoo.de> - 2015-06-07 19:46 +0200
Re: Calling constructor function with or without new Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2015-06-07 21:50 -0300
Re: Calling constructor function with or without new Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-06-09 15:05 +0200
Re: Calling constructor function with or without new Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2015-06-09 12:45 -0300
Re: Calling constructor function with or without new Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-06-09 18:32 +0200
Re: Calling constructor function with or without new Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2015-06-09 14:51 -0300
Re: Calling constructor function with or without new Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-06-09 22:39 +0200
Re: Calling constructor function with or without new Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2015-06-09 19:36 -0300
Re: Calling constructor function with or without new Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-06-10 18:14 +0200
Re: Calling constructor function with or without new Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2015-06-10 14:13 -0300
Re: Calling constructor function with or without new Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-06-10 19:34 +0200
Re: Calling constructor function with or without new Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2015-06-10 14:57 -0300
Re: Calling constructor function with or without new Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-06-10 20:00 +0200
Re: Calling constructor function with or without new Dr J R Stockton <reply1500@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2015-06-11 21:44 +0100
Re: Calling constructor function with or without new Hans-Georg Michna <hans-georgNoEmailPlease@michna.com> - 2015-06-11 10:36 +0200
Re: Calling constructor function with or without new Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2015-06-11 06:16 -0700
Re: Calling constructor function with or without new "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2015-06-11 20:40 -0700
csiph-web