Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #28073

Re: Calling constructor function with or without new

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br>
Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
Subject Re: Calling constructor function with or without new
Date Wed, 10 Jun 2015 14:57:57 -0300
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines 28
Message-ID <ml9tr3$k9v$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References <55745048$0$13014$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <ml2021$1at3$1@adenine.netfront.net> <ml2osq$3q6$1@speranza.aioe.org> <4020474.azVoJSYf4R@PointedEars.de> <ml71mq$4ec$1@speranza.aioe.org> <2573728.VVFZz2FXTb@PointedEars.de> <ml793o$n72$1@speranza.aioe.org> <1856630.MTooSpn00h@PointedEars.de> <ml7ppg$uhn$1@speranza.aioe.org> <1539352.pOhnpQ6Ohf@PointedEars.de> <ml9r84$cqq$1@speranza.aioe.org> <2115940.9N3qDlgpqz@PointedEars.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host Z4mkOnCncLIaN3uzYlJ+/w.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
X-Complaints-To abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
X-Notice Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:28073

Show key headers only | View raw

Thomas Lahn wrote:
> Joao Rodrigues wrote:
> 
>> Thomas Lahn wrote:
>>
>> [truisms]
> 
> I have only reworded there what I had written before; the meaning of it has
> not changed a bit.

You never come clean, don't you? No, you have changed your initial
meaning of normative by rephrasing your speech and amusingly deleting
the "non-normative" nonsense.

> How strange that you can agree with this so much that 
> you call it “truisms”,

Agreed only with the truism on how Ecma operates.

> but found it necessary to be impolite in your reply 
> to what I had written before.
> 

That's exactly what you do most of the time with everyone on this NG.


-- 
Joao Rodrigues

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Calling constructor function with or without new Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2015-06-08 00:08 +1000
  Re: Calling constructor function with or without new Martin Honnen <mahotrash@yahoo.de> - 2015-06-07 19:46 +0200
    Re: Calling constructor function with or without new Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2015-06-07 21:50 -0300
      Re: Calling constructor function with or without new Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-06-09 15:05 +0200
        Re: Calling constructor function with or without new Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2015-06-09 12:45 -0300
          Re: Calling constructor function with or without new Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-06-09 18:32 +0200
            Re: Calling constructor function with or without new Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2015-06-09 14:51 -0300
              Re: Calling constructor function with or without new Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-06-09 22:39 +0200
                Re: Calling constructor function with or without new Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2015-06-09 19:36 -0300
                Re: Calling constructor function with or without new Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-06-10 18:14 +0200
                Re: Calling constructor function with or without new Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2015-06-10 14:13 -0300
                Re: Calling constructor function with or without new Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-06-10 19:34 +0200
                Re: Calling constructor function with or without new Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2015-06-10 14:57 -0300
                Re: Calling constructor function with or without new Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-06-10 20:00 +0200
                Re: Calling constructor function with or without new Dr J R Stockton <reply1500@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2015-06-11 21:44 +0100
                Re: Calling constructor function with or without new Hans-Georg Michna <hans-georgNoEmailPlease@michna.com> - 2015-06-11 10:36 +0200
                Re: Calling constructor function with or without new Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2015-06-11 06:16 -0700
                Re: Calling constructor function with or without new "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2015-06-11 20:40 -0700

csiph-web