Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > chi.internet > #3089

Re: IoT

Show all headers | View raw

Mark Anderson <mea@nospambradnylion.com> wrote:
> In article presence@MUNGEpanix.com says...
>> > you're wrong on DNS being UDP only, it can use TCP too.
>> 
>> he's wrong on quite a few things. It's peculiar he's looking at the 
>> packets but not inside them. The query would probably explain what's going 
>> on.
> 
> I never claimed DNS was always UDP.  No devices on my network (average 
> 250 unique devices per month) have ever tried to use TCP for DNS so I 

wow, big network there. I'm going to take notes when you talk about 
networks.

> block it, or more accurately, I don't white list it.  I did look inside 
> the packets which is how I know port 80 traffic was just connecting and 
> disconnecting not sending any data.  It made one HTTP request and it 
> wasn't even valid request, just some binary data so Squid kicked it.  
> There was a single DNS request (using UDP) from the camera asking for 
> the address to iotcplatform.com.  Google hasn't provided me much info as 
> to what that is.  Whois says Taiwam which is weird because the camera is 
> made in China and I thought those two countries didn't get along with 
> each other.

WTF does china have to do with taiwan in this case, other than nothing? 
Your troubleshooting method is weak at best.

> If I get ambitious I might let that TCP to 8.8.8.8 through for awhile  
> and see what it's doing.  Right now the firewall drops those packets 

Better buckle up, that's a really ambitious move there.

> into a bit bucket with no response.  The camera just sends SYN and 
> that's it.  See how stupid you sound when you assume a situation?  Do 
> you always make proclamations on mere assumptions?  

You're the one that's baffled by a fucking webcam, not me. 

Back to chi.internet | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: IoT Cydrome Leader <presence@MUNGEpanix.com> - 2015-06-03 21:11 +0000
  Re: IoT Mark Anderson <mea@nospambradnylion.com> - 2015-06-03 18:55 -0400
    Re: IoT Bruce Esquibel <bje@ripco.com> - 2015-06-04 11:01 +0000
      Re: IoT Mark Anderson <mea@nospambradnylion.com> - 2015-06-04 14:49 -0400
        Re: IoT Bruce Esquibel <bje@ripco.com> - 2015-06-05 12:02 +0000
          Re: IoT Mark Anderson <mea@nospambradnylion.com> - 2015-06-05 13:54 -0400
            Re: IoT Cydrome Leader <presence@MUNGEpanix.com> - 2015-06-05 18:07 +0000
              Re: IoT Mark Anderson <mea@nospambradnylion.com> - 2015-06-05 14:10 -0400
              Re: IoT smr <me@shawnritchie.com> - 2015-06-05 13:13 -0500
                Re: IoT smr <me@shawnritchie.com> - 2015-06-05 19:34 -0500
                Re: IoT Mark Anderson <mea@nospambradnylion.com> - 2015-06-05 22:37 -0400
                Re: IoT Geoff Gass <glg@tanzenmb.com> - 2015-06-06 04:43 +0000
                Re: IoT Cydrome Leader <presence@MUNGEpanix.com> - 2015-06-08 16:55 +0000
                Re: IoT smr <me@shawnritchie.com> - 2015-06-08 14:14 -0500
                Re: IoT smr <me@shawnritchie.com> - 2015-06-06 15:02 -0500
                Re: IoT Cydrome Leader <presence@MUNGEpanix.com> - 2015-06-08 16:57 +0000
                Re: IoT smr <me@shawnritchie.com> - 2015-06-08 16:16 -0500
                Re: IoT Cydrome Leader <presence@MUNGEpanix.com> - 2015-06-09 21:58 +0000
                Re: IoT Mark Anderson <mea@nospambradnylion.com> - 2015-06-09 18:48 -0400
    Re: IoT Cydrome Leader <presence@MUNGEpanix.com> - 2015-06-04 19:16 +0000
      Re: IoT Mark Anderson <mea@nospambradnylion.com> - 2015-06-04 15:50 -0400
        Re: IoT Mark Anderson <mea@nospambradnylion.com> - 2015-06-04 19:18 -0400
          Re: IoT Cydrome Leader <presence@MUNGEpanix.com> - 2015-06-04 23:47 +0000
            Re: IoT Mark Anderson <mea@nospambradnylion.com> - 2015-06-05 14:07 -0400

csiph-web