Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Cydrome Leader <presence@MUNGEpanix.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | chi.internet |
| Subject | Re: IoT |
| Date | 2015-06-05 18:07 +0000 |
| Organization | PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC |
| Message-ID | <mksogc$g7v$1@reader1.panix.com> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <MPG.2fd94fed5952ccc8989fae@news.speakeasy.net> <mkpb6v$rfd$1@remote5bge0.ripco.com> <MPG.2fda67b54e4d5a17989faf@news.speakeasy.net> <mks340$ggm$1@remote5bge0.ripco.com> <MPG.2fdbac7a5331862989fb2@news.speakeasy.net> |
Mark Anderson <mea@nospambradnylion.com> wrote: > In article bje@ripco.com says... >> My guess is that camera was probably doing it from day 1 and you didn't >> notice until now. > > I know the exact time it started two days ago. My system monitors all > traffic from all devices. I even have raw pcap logs I could show you. > One of the features of my system is that it catches bots and it has > caught many over the years all from infected Windows PCs. People don't > haul around laptops anymore so most all traffic is from phones and > tablets and some Mac Airs so I haven't had a bot show up in over a year. > BTW: Apples and androids are about 50/50 and I rarely see a blackberry > anymore. Poor blackberry. > >> Whenever they start writing software into hardware they >> have to come up with some long term solution for minor issues like, is this >> thing still on the internet? If they put in the web address of the company >> that made it into the firmware to ping or try to connect to, the problem >> there is they might be out of business in 6 months. > > It's possible an internal timer went off telling it to phone home. It > got an address on its first DNS lookup and then it couldn't UDP out nor > could it get a binary data blob through on port 80 using invalid http. > Had they simply did a valid http GET to home base they could have > downloaded a software image no problem. This tomfoolery baffles me if > what they're doing is legit. That kind of software upgrade is a good > way to brick a lot of customer devices which would probably be more > liability than whatever they could gain from it. > > I set a valid gateway address in the camera because I wondered what kind > of comms it would do and it has been completely silent since I installed > it mid February. My other camera hasn't sent a single packet to the > Intertubes but that's an older model. These are gems: raw pcap logs internal timer couldn't UDP out binary data blob
Back to chi.internet | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: IoT Cydrome Leader <presence@MUNGEpanix.com> - 2015-06-03 21:11 +0000
Re: IoT Mark Anderson <mea@nospambradnylion.com> - 2015-06-03 18:55 -0400
Re: IoT Bruce Esquibel <bje@ripco.com> - 2015-06-04 11:01 +0000
Re: IoT Mark Anderson <mea@nospambradnylion.com> - 2015-06-04 14:49 -0400
Re: IoT Bruce Esquibel <bje@ripco.com> - 2015-06-05 12:02 +0000
Re: IoT Mark Anderson <mea@nospambradnylion.com> - 2015-06-05 13:54 -0400
Re: IoT Cydrome Leader <presence@MUNGEpanix.com> - 2015-06-05 18:07 +0000
Re: IoT Mark Anderson <mea@nospambradnylion.com> - 2015-06-05 14:10 -0400
Re: IoT smr <me@shawnritchie.com> - 2015-06-05 13:13 -0500
Re: IoT smr <me@shawnritchie.com> - 2015-06-05 19:34 -0500
Re: IoT Mark Anderson <mea@nospambradnylion.com> - 2015-06-05 22:37 -0400
Re: IoT Geoff Gass <glg@tanzenmb.com> - 2015-06-06 04:43 +0000
Re: IoT Cydrome Leader <presence@MUNGEpanix.com> - 2015-06-08 16:55 +0000
Re: IoT smr <me@shawnritchie.com> - 2015-06-08 14:14 -0500
Re: IoT smr <me@shawnritchie.com> - 2015-06-06 15:02 -0500
Re: IoT Cydrome Leader <presence@MUNGEpanix.com> - 2015-06-08 16:57 +0000
Re: IoT smr <me@shawnritchie.com> - 2015-06-08 16:16 -0500
Re: IoT Cydrome Leader <presence@MUNGEpanix.com> - 2015-06-09 21:58 +0000
Re: IoT Mark Anderson <mea@nospambradnylion.com> - 2015-06-09 18:48 -0400
Re: IoT Cydrome Leader <presence@MUNGEpanix.com> - 2015-06-04 19:16 +0000
Re: IoT Mark Anderson <mea@nospambradnylion.com> - 2015-06-04 15:50 -0400
Re: IoT Mark Anderson <mea@nospambradnylion.com> - 2015-06-04 19:18 -0400
Re: IoT Cydrome Leader <presence@MUNGEpanix.com> - 2015-06-04 23:47 +0000
Re: IoT Mark Anderson <mea@nospambradnylion.com> - 2015-06-05 14:07 -0400
csiph-web