Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #290553
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! |
| Date | 2015-04-18 17:30 +0200 |
| Organization | SMP |
| Message-ID | <mgtt9c$ff$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (21 earlier) <mgrkdg$17e$1@dont-email.me> <mgrmpm$aha$1@dont-email.me> <mgsaii$dqa$1@dont-email.me> <mgt736$hgj$5@dont-email.me> <mgtpbs$h3j$3@dont-email.me> |
Slimer wrote: > On 2015-04-18 5:12 AM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >> Slimer wrote: >> >>> On 2015-04-17 3:27 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>>> Slimer wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2015-04-17 12:45 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>>>>> Slimer wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2015-04-17 9:28 AM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>>>>>>> Slimer wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 2015-04-17 6:00 AM, Desk Rabbit wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 16/04/2015 14:05, Slimer wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 2015-04-16 3:03 AM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Slimer wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2015-04-15 5:14 PM, vallor wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/14/2015 05:26 AM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Desk Rabbit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter has a new job at his local football club. He's the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resident goal >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> post mover. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who was moving the goalposts when you idiots discovered that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your bullshit claim of "windows has snapshots, linux does >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not" vanished in a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> puff of smoke? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> JUST SO. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seriously, these kids cannot steer. If they wanted to bitch >>>>>>>>>>>>>> about something Linux doesn't have, they'd be complaining >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that LVM doesn't have proper deduplication, which is a valid >>>>>>>>>>>>>> criticism (up to a point). >>>>>>>>>>>>>> But no snapshots on Linux? Gimme a break. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Except that none of us said that Linux doesn't do snapshots. >>>>>>>>>>>>> We claimed that Linux distributions, by default, do not offer >>>>>>>>>>>>> it. That, regardless of how much tap-dancing you do, is >>>>>>>>>>>>> correct. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> < snip > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Finally, I'll add here that LVM works with ALL filesystems. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So if you wanted to use, say, xfs with it -- knock yourself >>>>>>>>>>>>>> out. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> However, that statement just confirms that LVM is not a >>>>>>>>>>>>> filesystem, doesn't it? By default, Linux does not provide >>>>>>>>>>>>> snapshots and the filesystem it uses doesn't even offer that >>>>>>>>>>>>> functionality. People CAN use >>>>>>>>>>>>> LVM, but this is up to the user to set up. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Will you argue with the above paragraph? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Yes. Because LVM is available out of the box, and easy to set >>>>>>>>>>>> up. LVM provides snapshots, and will work as a "meta-fs" above >>>>>>>>>>>> the underlying fs >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> That's great, but it's still not default. You can rearrange and >>>>>>>>>>> manipulate the word "default" as much as you want, but the >>>>>>>>>>> reality will remain that Linux distributions do not set LVM up >>>>>>>>>>> unless the user requests it. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Also, Linux *does* provide snapshots, as all big distros >>>>>>>>>>>> provide btrfs >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Except that btrfs, according to experts, is still not able for >>>>>>>>>>> prime time. It's like putting an experimental, explosive motor >>>>>>>>>>> into a Ford Focus... because let's face it, Linux is no better >>>>>>>>>>> an operating system than a Ford Focus is a car. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Will you argue with anything about that? You idiots got your >>>>>>>>>>>> ass handed to >>>>>>>>>>>> you by the bullshit claim that "windows provides snapshots, >>>>>>>>>>>> linux does not" >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Actually, our asses were not handed to us because you made a >>>>>>>>>>> fool of yourself repeatedly and kept moving goalposts only to be >>>>>>>>>>> schooled by me over and over and over again. If anyone lost the >>>>>>>>>>> argument, it's you. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> It was a bullshit claim, and it is since several years. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Call us in 2039 when Linux finally provides snapshots by default >>>>>>>>>>> and you claim that fact as a "victory." >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Tell RedHat or SLES that they don't provide snapshots. Idiot >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You should do it yourself since us "Wintrolls" don't give a shit >>>>>>>>>>> about the well-being of either company and its users. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Exactly. Windows desktop provides Restore points / snapshots out >>>>>>>>>> of the box. The user doesn't need to know anything about file >>>>>>>>>> systems or volumes, it's there right after you've installed it >>>>>>>>>> with nothing else for the non technical user to do. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Which also happens to be the best approach. A person who buys a >>>>>>>>> computer for the first time is not likely to know about btrfs, LVM >>>>>>>>> and snapshots and won't think to set them up. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Which is exactly irrelevant in the context of you idiots claiming >>>>>>>> that "windows has snapshots, linux does not" >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> YOu cretins know less than nothing about linux. And claim utter >>>>>>>> bullshit. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And now you are just Snits and want to weasel word out of the >>>>>>>> corner you have painted into yourself >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Except, once again, nobody said that. From the very beginning, the >>>>>>> word "default" was used and your tap-dancing somehow didn't allow >>>>>>> you to edit the post. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Quit lying. "Default" wasn't any topic when this idiotic claim of you >>>>>> lunatic windrones came up. Because it had no use, if you would have >>>>>> been right about "windows having snapshots and linux does not". *If* >>>>>> that bullshit claim would have had any merit whatsoever, "default" or >>>>>> not would have been irrelevant >>>>> >>>>> The fact remains that if a Windows convert decided to install Linux >>>>> today, >>>> >>>> The fact is that this is totally irrelevant. >>>> >>>> You idiots claimed that "windows has snapshots, linux does not". >>> >>> Please show me where I made that specific claim. >> >> It is totally irrelevant who first of you group of lying crooks made that >> claim. All of your have tried after that to downplay the existance of the >> linux snapshots. And made yourself look as the very lunatic Snits you >> really are > > So you're avoiding answering the question and therefore confirm that I > never said such a thing. You truly are the biggest Peter Köhlmann in > COLA, not even worth being used as dog food. > I avoided "the question"? Really? Are you *that* dense? You posed no question worth answering, Snit Slimeball. Yet I easily mad small shrivels out of your gasbag theories. You are really a Snit. Dishonest, a piece of human garbage and not worth to be pissed on if you were on fire
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-16 09:03 +0200
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-16 09:05 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-17 11:00 +0100
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-17 08:59 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-17 15:28 +0200
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-17 12:35 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-17 18:45 +0200
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-17 14:47 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-17 21:27 +0200
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-17 21:05 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-18 11:12 +0200
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-18 10:23 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-18 17:30 +0200
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-18 08:42 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-18 17:50 +0200
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-18 09:15 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-18 12:15 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-18 12:45 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-18 14:15 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-18 20:28 +0200
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-18 15:24 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-21 11:25 +0100
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-21 10:48 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-21 08:44 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-21 12:50 +0200
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-04-21 12:05 +0100
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-21 12:37 +0100
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-21 08:44 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-21 08:30 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-21 11:40 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-21 12:42 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-21 07:18 -0500
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-21 14:37 +0100
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-21 09:54 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-21 12:05 -0500
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-21 12:46 -0500
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-21 13:41 -0500
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-21 14:53 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-21 12:22 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-21 16:43 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-21 13:58 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-21 14:04 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-23 22:31 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-23 21:36 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-24 01:28 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-21 20:56 +0000
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-21 14:51 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-22 08:06 -0500
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-22 09:20 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-04-21 23:11 +0100
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-21 18:28 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-21 18:54 -0600
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-21 21:00 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-23 10:09 +0100
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-23 12:44 -0500
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-04-23 23:24 +0100
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-24 01:19 +0000
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-23 21:42 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-23 21:03 -0500
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-23 22:41 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-23 21:41 -0600
Then how come the landfill is full of tossed out Linux dvds? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-23 21:40 -0600
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-24 09:44 +0100
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-23 22:38 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-24 09:05 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-24 11:15 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-24 12:14 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-25 09:19 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-25 11:13 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-27 08:58 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-27 09:14 -0400
FUD #3! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-23 21:39 -0600
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-24 09:37 +0100
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-21 20:21 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-21 20:43 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-22 07:19 -0500
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-23 10:13 +0100
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-23 11:29 +0200
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-23 05:57 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-23 11:29 +0100
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-23 12:49 +0200
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-04-23 12:06 +0100
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-23 13:39 +0100
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-23 08:49 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-23 17:41 +0000
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-24 09:48 +0100
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-24 09:16 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-24 16:31 +0200
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-24 20:13 +0000
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-24 14:56 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-25 00:10 +0200
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-24 15:16 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-25 00:21 +0200
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-24 15:28 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-27 10:08 -0500
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-27 08:59 -0700
Oh, like your lies? GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-04-27 11:08 -0600
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-23 07:04 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-23 12:11 +0100
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-23 08:50 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-23 11:36 -0600
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-04-23 11:54 +0100
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-23 12:16 +0100
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-23 06:49 -0500
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-23 13:45 +0100
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-23 17:43 +0000
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-23 17:39 +0000
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-23 12:45 -0500
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-23 18:22 +0000
LOL!!! Will it replace your missing braincell? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-23 21:38 -0600
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-24 01:21 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-24 09:51 +0100
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-23 08:43 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-23 15:33 +0100
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-23 17:25 +0200
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-23 08:48 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-23 12:46 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-23 10:21 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-24 10:01 +0100
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-24 09:26 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-24 08:59 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-24 10:36 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-24 13:45 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-24 11:24 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-24 14:34 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-23 17:44 +0000
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-23 20:14 +0200
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-23 12:42 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-24 09:52 +0100
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-23 10:12 +0100
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-23 10:03 +0100
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-23 08:42 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-21 20:42 +0000
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-21 13:59 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-21 17:05 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-23 10:05 +0100
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-23 11:28 +0200
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-23 17:37 +0000
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-23 11:02 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-23 20:13 +0200
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-23 18:25 +0000
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-23 15:39 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-24 01:26 +0000
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-23 18:40 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-23 21:37 -0600
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-24 10:12 +0100
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-23 21:32 -0600
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-24 01:32 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-24 10:14 +0100
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-24 10:29 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-24 11:16 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-24 12:27 -0600
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-24 13:17 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-24 16:09 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-25 09:17 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-25 13:02 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-27 09:08 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-27 06:41 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-24 16:00 -0600
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-24 09:12 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-24 12:26 -0600
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-24 17:41 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-24 14:58 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-24 18:20 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-24 15:30 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-24 15:59 -0600
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-24 18:25 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-25 09:18 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-25 11:07 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-24 10:05 +0100
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-24 11:32 +0200
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-24 06:38 -0500
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-24 13:15 +0100
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-24 14:38 +0200
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-24 09:08 -0500
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-24 12:10 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-24 20:16 +0000
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-24 22:45 +0200
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-24 07:59 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-24 20:15 +0000
RonB: Obsessed with Apple and windows for over 20 years. Get a life. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-24 15:57 -0600
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-24 09:28 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-24 06:46 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-24 20:11 +0000
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-27 12:41 +0100
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-27 09:02 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-27 12:40 +0100
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-27 09:05 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-27 16:37 +0100
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-27 13:13 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-27 07:27 -0500
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-27 08:48 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-27 16:40 +0100
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-27 10:04 -0500
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-27 16:43 +0100
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-27 18:22 +0200
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-27 09:36 -0700
More ignorance and FUD by you. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-23 21:30 -0600
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-23 14:38 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-23 20:46 -0500
Real UNIX works properly. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-23 21:29 -0600
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-23 12:36 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-23 22:42 +0200
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-24 01:19 +0000
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-23 21:40 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-23 21:01 -0500
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-23 22:34 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-23 21:29 -0600
More FUD. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-23 21:28 -0600
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-24 10:16 +0100
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-24 11:28 +0200
Flounder thinks Joe Sixpack knows "restore points" Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-24 06:02 -0400
Re: Flounder thinks Joe Sixpack knows "restore points" Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-24 11:23 +0100
Re: Flounder thinks Joe Sixpack knows "restore points" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-24 13:21 +0200
Re: Flounder thinks Joe Sixpack knows "restore points" JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-27 10:12 -0500
Re: Flounder thinks Joe Sixpack knows "restore points" Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-27 16:46 +0100
Re: Flounder thinks Joe Sixpack knows "restore points" Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-27 13:15 -0400
Re: Flounder thinks Joe Sixpack knows "restore points" ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-27 16:06 +0000
No, you can't. You lie yet again. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-04-27 11:08 -0600
Quit lying, JED. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-04-27 11:07 -0600
Re: Flounder thinks Joe Sixpack knows "restore points" DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-28 07:31 -0400
FUD #2! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-23 21:27 -0600
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-23 22:32 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-23 12:48 -0500
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-23 18:20 +0000
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-23 13:25 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-23 22:41 +0200
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-23 13:58 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-23 23:00 +0200
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-23 14:08 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-23 23:17 +0200
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-23 14:42 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-23 20:23 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-23 18:17 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-24 01:18 +0000
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-23 18:27 -0700
But where is your life? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-23 21:26 -0600
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-23 20:49 -0500
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-24 02:41 +0000
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-23 19:50 -0700
Yet windows is CERNS new default OS. LOL!!! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-23 21:26 -0600
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-24 11:42 +0100
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-27 10:40 -0500
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-27 09:02 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-27 12:44 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-27 09:49 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-27 16:54 +0000
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-27 10:07 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-27 12:23 -0500
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-27 19:31 +0200
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-27 10:45 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-27 10:45 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-27 17:15 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-27 14:32 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-27 17:59 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-27 18:25 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-27 17:27 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-28 00:05 +0200
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-27 17:23 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-28 09:04 +0200
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-28 07:53 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-28 07:06 -0500
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-28 08:48 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-28 20:42 +0200
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-28 11:51 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-28 14:02 -0500
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-28 13:16 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-28 14:16 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-29 07:46 -0500
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-29 08:03 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-28 00:07 +0200
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-27 17:21 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-28 10:23 +0200
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-28 06:21 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-28 08:07 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-28 07:50 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-27 13:24 -0500
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-27 11:51 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-27 19:33 +0000
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-27 12:52 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-27 19:31 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-27 19:50 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-27 20:02 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-27 20:07 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-27 20:13 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-27 20:15 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-27 20:23 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-27 20:28 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-27 20:38 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-27 18:14 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-28 12:46 -0500
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-28 11:25 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-04-28 12:51 -0600
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-28 20:01 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-28 20:37 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-28 19:15 -0700
What way is that, Turdv? Viewing porn? GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-04-27 11:10 -0600
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-24 01:13 +0000
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-23 18:30 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-23 21:25 -0600
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-24 11:46 +0100
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-24 07:03 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-24 08:51 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-24 20:31 +0000
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-27 12:49 +0100
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-27 10:07 -0500
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-27 13:11 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-27 12:43 +0100
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-27 09:01 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-23 20:13 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-23 18:19 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-24 11:48 +0100
More FUD! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-23 21:24 -0600
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-23 21:24 -0600
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-24 10:19 +0100
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-24 11:24 +0200
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-04-24 10:49 +0100
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-24 11:49 +0100
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-24 06:10 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-24 11:53 +0100
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-24 07:06 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-24 12:08 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-24 09:58 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-27 12:50 +0100
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-27 10:00 -0500
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-27 10:33 -0500
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-27 16:58 +0100
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-27 12:56 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-21 12:39 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-18 16:18 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-19 11:04 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-19 18:50 +0200
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-19 16:48 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-20 09:43 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-20 18:47 +0200
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-20 10:20 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-20 21:10 +0200
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-20 12:18 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-20 17:10 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-20 14:20 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-20 19:28 +0000
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-20 12:31 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-20 15:37 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-20 12:55 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-20 17:07 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-20 11:31 -0500
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-18 15:17 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-20 00:30 +0000
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-19 17:49 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-20 09:49 +0200
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-20 08:13 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-20 11:15 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-20 08:22 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-20 09:52 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-18 12:05 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-17 12:43 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-17 08:28 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-16 09:26 -0500
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-16 11:43 -0400
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-16 15:02 +0000
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-16 08:08 -0700
Re: ext4 vs btrfs - a new winner! Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-16 08:29 -0700
csiph-web