Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #287888

Re: yep, it's an iGay

From Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: yep, it's an iGay
Date 2015-04-05 01:09 +0200
Organization SMP
Message-ID <mfpqtb$ijb$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (16 earlier) <Xaqdnbf3x-3gUIDInZ2dnUU7-LWdnZ2d@bresnan.com> <mfkrsm$qls$1@dont-email.me> <J6ednQ3JbZqVfYPInZ2dnUU7-UGdnZ2d@bresnan.com> <mfmr13$por$1@dont-email.me> <SLWdnWOFjbzm-73InZ2dnUU7-VGdnZ2d@bresnan.com>

Show all headers | View raw


GreyCloud wrote:

> Slimer wrote:
> 
>> On 2015-04-03 2:46 PM, GreyCloud wrote:
>>> Slimer wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2015-04-02 7:15 PM, GreyCloud wrote:
>>>>> Slimer wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2015-04-01 8:07 PM, owl wrote:
>>>>>>> Peter K??hlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>> owl wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Peter K??hlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> owl wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Peter K??hlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> owl wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ezekiel <zeke@nosuchemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:bvhfytr84.kjhor@rooftop.invalid...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter K??hlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tattoo Vampire wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Marti van Lin wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What are you trying to imply by "badass" and are you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implying Tim Cook wears a pink Apple Watch?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bowel, like most Wintrolls here, is homophobic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He is also a nazi. A really disgusting racist. Even worse
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than flatfish and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DFS, i that is possible at all. Stupid rednecks with lots
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of vacuum between
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their ears
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Did your family keep any souvenirs from 1096?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> 
> 
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/08/Gottfried_von_Bouillon_%28Hofkirche_Innsbruck%29_2006_0931C.jpg/170px->>>>> Gottfried_von_Bouillon_%28Hofkirche_Innsbruck%29_2006_0931C.jpg
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe from the nearby slave labor camp in 1945?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> 
> 
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/11/22/article-1230025-07508CC6000005DC-7_470x423_popup.jpg
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> 
> 
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/11/22/article-1230025-075087A2000005DC-954_470x423_popup.jpg
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You Mainz bastards have a lot to account for.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is a pretty sick and twisted subject but I remember a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> short while back a bunch of posts about lampshades, soap,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc. Then I saw this on the DailyMail website less than one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> month ago:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <quote>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bar of soap 'made from the fat of Jewish Holocaust victims'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is removed from eBay after Dutch owner put it up for sale
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6 March 2015
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        * The listing sought ?199 for the bar of soap
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        reportedly made from 'fat' * It was claimed victims of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        the Westerbork concentration camp in Holland * The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        Nazis are believed to have experimented with the soap
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        during the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> war
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        * SS leader Heinrich Himmler is reported to have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        stopped the experiments
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </quote>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2982639/Bar-soap-fat->>>>> Jewish-Holocaust-victims-removed-eBay-Dutch-owner-sale.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The soap thing has been fairly well debunked, but what jumped
>>>>>>>>>>>>> out at me when first hearing the story was the idea that nazis
>>>>>>>>>>>>> would want to wash
>>>>>>>>>>>>> with soap made from melted jews.  It just kind of goes against
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the grain.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Who said anything about them using it themselves?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Holocaust/soap.html
>>>>>>>>>>> <quote>
>>>>>>>>>>> "It's a general conception that the Nazis manufactured soap,"
>>>>>>>>>>> says Michael Berenbaum, who was project manager for the United
>>>>>>>>>>> States Holocaust Memorial Museum [USHMM] before it opened in
>>>>>>>>>>> 1993 and headed the museum’s research institute until
>>>>>>>>>>> 1997. "But those of us working in this area have not used it as
>>>>>>>>>>> an example [of Nazi atrocity] in the last 10 to 15 years. We
>>>>>>>>>>> don't have any evidence that the Nazis actually manufactured
>>>>>>>>>>> soap with human bodies." ...
>>>>>>>>>>> Aaron Breitbart, a senior researcher at the Simon Wiesenthal
>>>>>>>>>>> Center, agreed that the evidence is thin. "The leading scholars
>>>>>>>>>>> of the Holocaust are of the opinion that the Nazis did not make
>>>>>>>>>>> soap," he says. "It was a cruel rumor at the camps."
>>>>>>>>>>> </quote>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Feel free to whitewhash your fellow nazi-bastards. After all,
>>>>>>>>>> Himmler would have welcomed racist swine like you rather warmly
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Himmler knew a thing or two about propaganda.  Apparently you
>>>>>>>>> don't.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Himmler knew very little about "propaganda". That was where
>>>>>>>> Göbbels came into play. Himmler was a stupid fool who came into
>>>>>>>> power. He would have liked you a lot. You are just as stupid as
>>>>>>>> that racist swine
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I didn't say he was Propaganda Minister.  I said he knew a thing or
>>>>>>> two
>>>>>>> about it.  Do you ever get *anything* right?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heinrich_Himmler
>>>>>>> <quote>
>>>>>>>    From mid-1924 he worked under Gregor Strasser as a party
>>>>>>>    secretary and
>>>>>>> propaganda assistant.
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> Strasser appointed Himmler deputy propaganda chief in January 1927.
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> Upon the resignation of SS commander Erhard Heiden in 1929,
>>>>>>> Himmler assumed the position of Reichsführer-SS with Hitler's
>>>>>>> approval;[36][39][a] he still carried out his duties at propaganda
>>>>>>> headquarters.
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> When Hitler and his army chiefs asked for a pretext for the invasion
>>>>>>> of Poland in 1939, Himmler, Heydrich, and Heinrich Müller
>>>>>>> masterminded and carried out a false flag project code-named
>>>>>>> Operation Himmler. German soldiers dressed in Polish uniforms
>>>>>>> undertook border skirmishes that deceptively suggested Polish
>>>>>>> aggression against Germany. The incidents were then used in Nazi
>>>>>>> propaganda to justify the invasion of Poland, the opening event of
>>>>>>> World War II.[92] </quote>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Idiot.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Germany didn't even need to carry out the false flag. They had
>>>>>> invaded the Rhineland, the Czech Republic and Austria without really
>>>>>> needing to provide an explanation, you would think that they wouldn't
>>>>>> have bothered for Poland either. The only reason that they did was
>>>>>> because they knew that the country was essentially "protected" by a
>>>>>> treaty with Britain and France. Unfortunately, neither of the two
>>>>>> countries bothered to do _anything_ to help the country out. Poland
>>>>>> was left to defend against Germany on its own for a while, and did it
>>>>>> very well I might add, stalling the country's advance, until the
>>>>>> Soviet Union's deal with Germany kicked in and they attacked on the
>>>>>> country opposing and vulnerable border.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Poland has been forced to defend itself against these two superpowers
>>>>>> on many occasions in its history. They had successfully repelled the
>>>>>> Bolsheviks in 1920 for example proving that on equal ground, they
>>>>>> were a force to be reckoned with. Armies had to essentially _cheat_,
>>>>>> something Germans are very good at, to defeat them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If it weren't for Polish hussars, Europe would be speaking Arabic
>>>>>> right now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> I just got thru reading an item regarding the polish invasion.
>>>>> It seems that the poles were killing germans that lived in poland.
>>>>> And that really pissed of Hitler.
>>>>
>>>> They might have been bothering them, but if that were true, it wouldn't
>>>> explain why Hitler invaded the Rhineland, Austria-Hungary and the Czech
>>>> Republic. Does history claim that events within their borders angered
>>>> him or is it simply true that he was an expansionist who was looking
>>>> for _any_ imaginable reason to attack his neighbours?
>>>
>>> There are photos in the archive showing the dead german families in
>>> Poland. But the real problem is revisionist historians rewriting or
>>> twisting the
>>> truth around to the winners viewpoint.  Doesn't matter now tho.
>>> Like who wouldn't get pissed if they find out that their countrymen were
>>> getting murdered in their own homes?
>>> There is a lot more tied to this tho.  One factor was the 25% interest
>>> piled
>>> on to the war reparations act that could never be paid off.  It's called
>>> extortion.
>>> And extortion always leads to violence, and the rest is history.
>> 
>> Except that the reparations were paid off in 2010. It was going to take
>> forever and make Germany miserable until paid but the rest of the world
>> was trying to prevent the country from arming itself again and
>> succeeding at that plan. Germans didn't like the way their standard of
>> living significantly dropped and who could blame them but it was
>> deserved. It's possible that the Germans still living in Poland were
>> being abused and killed, I'm not denying the possibility because there
>> are definitely going to be hatred as a consequence of the fact that
>> Poland didn't even exist during the First World War and was instead a
>> German territory. However, considering Hitler's actions, it wouldn't be
>> surprising to me if this turned out to just be another propaganda piece.
>> 
>>>> Once Poland was reformed after the World War, Germany lost Poland's
>>>> territory and had to concede territory that had always been theirs to
>>>> allow Poland to have access to water. The Danzig area remained German
>>>> and they claimed that they wanted to make some sort of highway to
>>>> connect that area to Germany. It was merely propaganda though. Whether
>>>> they had lost their territory or not, they would have attacked Poland
>>>> and tried to conquer it one way or the other. Look at it this way:
>>>> Hitler stupidly attacked his most powerful ally in Stalin. He almost
>>>> got to Moscow and took it over mind you, but since he didn't, that one
>>>> move was what caused him to lose the war.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Agreed on that last part.  There are some facts from Alamagordo area
>>> during the early part of 1945 where the U.S. actually got three atom
>>> bombs from
>>> germany.  A memo to the white house in May of 1945 said that it would
>>> take
>>> another year or more to get enough plutonium to make one bomb.  Well,
>>> the U.S. detonated one of those at the Trinity site, and the other two
>>> were
>>> detonated in Japan.  So it shows some thread of truth considering this
>>> certain plutonium supply problem.
>> 
>> Had Germany gotten the bomb, I can't imagine what kind of world we would
>> be living in today.
>> 
> Lets put it this way... when I was in MI, I was told the harsh truth.
> That literally turned my world upside down.
> Germany used two on the eastern front

Idiot. Germany was at least 3 years away from the bomb when the war was 
over. Germany was more advanced than the US in several ways, like airplanes, 
rockets and submarines. But germany had no working nukes, and it was years 
away from them. They had not even enough heavy water to build a single 
nuclear reactor, at that time needed to breed plutonium or enrich uranium

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

yep, it's an iGay owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 17:07 +0000
  Re: yep, it's an iGay DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 13:10 -0400
    Re: yep, it's an iGay Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 12:17 -0700
      Re: yep, it's an iGay Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 12:24 -0700
        Re: yep, it's an iGay DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 22:23 -0400
          Re: yep, it's an iGay Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 19:47 -0700
            Re: yep, it's an iGay -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-03-30 09:28 -0700
              Re: yep, it's an iGay "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-30 12:41 -0400
                Re: yep, it's an iGay -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-03-30 11:41 -0700
              Re: yep, it's an iGay Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 10:15 -0700
                Re: yep, it's an iGay -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-03-30 11:35 -0700
                Re: yep, it's an iGay "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-30 15:39 -0400
                Re: yep, it's an iGay Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 12:43 -0700
                Re: yep, it's an iGay -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-03-30 17:18 -0700
                Re: yep, it's an iGay Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 17:35 -0700
                Re: yep, it's an iGay -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-03-30 19:11 -0700
                Re: yep, it's an iGay Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 20:13 -0700
                Re: yep, it's an iGay -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-03-31 03:47 -0700
                Re: yep, it's an iGay Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-31 08:39 -0700
                Re: yep, it's an iGay -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-03-31 09:22 -0700
                Re: yep, it's an iGay Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 10:10 -0700
                Re: yep, it's an iGay -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-02 03:18 -0700
                Re: yep, it's an iGay Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-02 08:10 -0700
      Re: yep, it's an iGay Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 13:56 -0700
    Re: yep, it's an iGay Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 13:57 -0700
  Re: yep, it's an iGay Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-03-30 09:33 +0100
  Re: yep, it's an iGay Marti van Lin <ml2mst@nospam.indvalid> - 2015-03-31 01:39 +0200
    Re: yep, it's an iGay owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-31 00:09 +0000
      Re: yep, it's an iGay DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-31 09:42 -0400
      Re: yep, it's an iGay Marti van Lin <ml2mst@nospam.indvalid> - 2015-04-01 01:51 +0200
        Re: yep, it's an iGay owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-01 00:14 +0000
        Re: yep, it's an iGay Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2015-04-01 11:50 +0000
          Re: yep, it's an iGay DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 08:31 -0400
            Re: yep, it's an iGay -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-01 06:09 -0700
          Re: yep, it's an iGay Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-01 17:14 +0200
            Re: yep, it's an iGay GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 12:18 -0600
            Re: yep, it's an iGay owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-01 18:59 +0000
              Re: yep, it's an iGay "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-01 15:05 -0400
                Re: yep, it's an iGay owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-01 20:49 +0000
                Re: yep, it's an iGay Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-01 22:58 +0200
                Re: yep, it's an iGay owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-01 21:57 +0000
                Re: yep, it's an iGay Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-02 00:15 +0200
                Re: yep, it's an iGay owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-01 23:10 +0000
                Re: yep, it's an iGay Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-02 01:40 +0200
                Re: yep, it's an iGay owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-02 00:07 +0000
                Re: yep, it's an iGay Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 20:56 -0400
                Re: yep, it's an iGay GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 17:15 -0600
                Re: yep, it's an iGay Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-03 01:23 +0200
                Re: yep, it's an iGay GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 19:08 -0600
                Re: yep, it's an iGay Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-02 21:55 -0400
                Re: yep, it's an iGay GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:46 -0600
                Re: yep, it's an iGay Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-03 15:52 -0400
                Re: yep, it's an iGay GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-04 16:32 -0600
                Re: yep, it's an iGay Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-05 01:09 +0200
                Re: yep, it's an iGay GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-05 12:38 -0600
                Re: yep, it's an iGay Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-05 11:29 -0400
                Re: yep, it's an iGay GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-05 12:33 -0600
                Re: yep, it's an iGay -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-04 18:06 -0700
                Re: yep, it's an iGay GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-05 12:31 -0600
                Re: yep, it's an iGay DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 23:15 -0400
                Re: yep, it's an iGay Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 23:48 -0400
          Re: yep, it's an iGay GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 12:18 -0600
    Re: yep, it's an iGay Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-30 20:19 -0400
      Re: yep, it's an iGay jeremywalmartprescottaz@gmail.com - 2015-03-30 17:42 -0700
  Re: yep, it's an iGay awoolmeyer@gmail.com - 2015-03-31 08:47 -0700

csiph-web