Re: file location

From	Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.misc
Subject	Re: file location
Followup-To	comp.os.linux.misc
Date	2015-02-04 01:51 +0100
Organization	A noiseless patient Strider
Message-ID	<marqdn$t9c$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(6 earlier) <wwvh9v38iy2.fsf@l1AntVDjLrnP7Td3DQJ8ynzIq3lJMueXf87AxnpFoA.invalid> <maq7q6$9bq$1@dont-email.me> <wwvlhkffem6.fsf@l1AntVDjLrnP7Td3DQJ8ynzIq3lJMueXf87AxnpFoA.invalid> <maqaa0$kbf$1@dont-email.me> <wwva90ug7q7.fsf@l1AntVDjLrnP7Td3DQJ8ynzIq3lJMueXf87AxnpFoA.invalid>

Followups directed to: comp.os.linux.misc

Show all headers | View raw

On Tuesday 03 February 2015 19:39, Richard Kettlewell conveyed the 
following to comp.os.linux.misc...

> Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> writes:
>> Richard Kettlewell conveyed the following to comp.os.linux.misc...
>>> So produce some evidence.
>>> 
>>> Wait, I already challenged you to do that, ...
>>
>> Not about this matter, you haven't.
> 
> In fact I did, in January 2012.

January 2012, huh?  So you keep your Usenet archives for three years?

Great, another Usenet stalker.  Sheesh.

>     Aragorn <stryder@telenet.be.invalid> writes:
>     [...]
>     > CP/M itself was loosely inspired by both UNIX and VMS.  And NT
>     > is a virtually identical copy of the VMS kernel, and still
>     > carries a lot of the DOS legacy in it, both from DOS directly
>     > and from OS/2, which was devised - by IBM, not by Microsoft - to
>     > be the successor of DOS for 80286 and later processors.  Here
>     > too, Gates pulled the same stunt, i.e. he approached Dave
>     > Cutler, one of the authors of the VMS kernel, to write NT. 
>     > Cutler copied “his” VMS code almost verbatim in NT, and was
>     > caught in the act by DEC, who fired him on the spot and sued
>     > Microsoft. Gates settled the matter with DEC out of court
>     > and immediately hired Cutler as the Chief NT Architect.
> 
>     And your evidence for these claims is...

Okay, so you did ─ my mistake for not remembering the details of that 
previous "disagreement".  My answer is nevertheless still the same, and 
as I've already given it to you more than once, I shall not repeat 
myself again.

The funny part of it all is how you always manage to filter out those 
points of contention to criticize me on ─ which you don't seem to be 
doing with any other poster, regardless of what they claim ─ while never 
corroborating anything else of what I said.  That sounds like someone 
with an obsession or fixation, and given that you appear to be keeping 
archives dating back over three years, you are starting to sound like a 
particular stalker from alt.os.linux.ubuntu whose name I shall not 
mention here, lest sleeping dogs could wake up.  He too likes keeping 
archives on people's posts, and even goes so far as to Google for posts 
they made ten years ago, so that he could discredit them in one form or 
another.

I seriously advise you to seek another hobby.  One that would be 
socially more constructive.  I don't handle stalkers very well.

No, don't bother replying.  Please.

-- 
= Aragorn =

         http://www.linuxcounter.net - registrant #223157

Thread

file location "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2015-01-30 18:00 -0500
  Re: file location William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2015-01-31 00:08 +0000
  Re: file location Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2015-01-31 00:30 +0000
    Re: file location William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2015-01-31 00:51 +0000
      Re: file location Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2015-01-31 09:03 +0000
        Re: file location William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2015-01-31 18:14 +0000
          Re: file location "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2015-01-31 19:00 -0500
            Re: file location William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2015-02-01 05:14 +0000
  Re: file location Zaphod Beeblebrox <none@none.org> - 2015-01-30 20:06 -0600
    Re: file location "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2015-01-31 18:54 -0500
      Re: file location Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> - 2015-02-01 04:52 +0100
        Re: file location "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2015-02-02 15:50 -0500
          Re: file location Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> - 2015-02-02 22:05 +0100
          Re: file location Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2015-02-02 22:29 +0000
            Re: file location "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2015-02-02 18:05 -0500
        Re: file location Chick Tower <c.tower@deadspam.com> - 2015-02-03 01:38 +0000
          Re: file location Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> - 2015-02-03 02:54 +0100
            Re: file location Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2015-02-03 09:04 +0000
              Re: file location Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> - 2015-02-03 11:27 +0100
                Re: file location Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2015-02-03 10:56 +0000
                Re: file location Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> - 2015-02-03 12:10 +0100
                Re: file location Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2015-02-03 18:39 +0000
                Re: file location Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> - 2015-02-04 01:51 +0100
                Re: file location Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2015-02-04 09:19 +0000
              Re: file location The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2015-02-03 12:21 +0000
                Re: file location Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2015-02-03 12:57 +0000
                Re: file location William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2015-02-03 16:58 +0000
                Re: file location John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2015-02-03 11:24 -0600
                Re: file location The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2015-02-03 18:21 +0000
                Re: file location William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2015-02-04 01:11 +0000
                Re: file location The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2015-02-04 10:24 +0000
                Re: file location William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2015-02-04 23:19 +0000
                Re: file location Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> - 2015-02-05 00:34 +0100
                Re: file location William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2015-02-04 01:08 +0000
                Re: file location The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2015-02-03 17:20 +0000
            Re: file location "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2015-02-03 14:47 -0500
              Re: file location Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> - 2015-02-04 02:10 +0100

csiph-web