Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #81854

Re: Style question: Importing modules from packages - 'from' vs 'as'

References <CAPTjJmo1-QCgcbsjKNgH3oN-nm5qjB5GrvCiC6Qc9p+S8cNjpg@mail.gmail.com> <m5ms2d$ea0$1@ger.gmane.org>
Date 2014-12-03 22:33 +1100
Subject Re: Style question: Importing modules from packages - 'from' vs 'as'
From Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.16529.1417606395.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> wrote:
> Don't repeat yourself, so
>
> from os import path
>
> always. On the other hand I have never thought about actual renames, e. g.
>
> from os import path as stdpath
>
> versus
>
> import os.path as stdpath
>
> I think I'd use the latter as it looks simpler.

Thanks, Peter and Tim. Keeping DRY is worth doing (the more so as it's
raining as I type this...), and I won't be renaming in this, so the
from-import wins - but as Tim says, it's a close race.

I do like the turn-around times on this list. Although, of course,
it's entirely possible there'll be a week's worth of posts coming when
someone hits on a controversial subaspect of the question somewhere;
any volunteers? :) :)

ChrisA

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Style question: Importing modules from packages - 'from' vs 'as' Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-12-03 22:33 +1100

csiph-web