Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!bcyclone05.am1.xlned.com!bcyclone05.am1.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.017 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.97; '*S*': 0.00; "subject:' ": 0.07; 'latter': 0.09; 'os.path': 0.09; 'subject:modules': 0.09; 'subject:question': 0.10; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'although,': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'hits': 0.16; 'renaming': 0.16; "week's": 0.16; 'thanks,': 0.17; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'wed,': 0.18; '(the': 0.22; 'import': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'looks': 0.24; 'question': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'posts': 0.26; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'tim': 0.29; 'dec': 0.30; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'entirely': 0.33; 'actual': 0.34; "i'd": 0.34; 'subject:from': 0.34; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'doing': 0.36; 'possible': 0.36; 'list.': 0.37; 'pm,': 0.38; 'times': 0.62; 'more': 0.64; 'worth': 0.66; 'close': 0.67; 'repeat': 0.74; 'hand': 0.80; 'dry': 0.84; 'otten': 0.84; 'to:none': 0.92; 'yourself,': 0.95 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; bh=nRIPTNeomX1/lIYytsJSgiVDXW+hYYtJz8CdNGmUy8Y=; b=PJlI3HND578Ox4qqnJ2eMW4XlZhgKxKEIYRcTw+kNHZzVMRIuB+DTgBTxxpln6owsT 9AOzTdYoQveOOzg65j0X23WOJxV1+AwCxJ44BjMAdI0sLHgpq01lWbQ8A+9Lp1oHYeL0 AlAhtvlK9N7h1dc+AQR8B+REzxxMW1rb4GUQ7xJnm1V1jyie00C1tJVsnB4I8Sbi4rLT f1q6Aj6c34wcnC7jX4HqLLLLOB4dy/TdZ9rtnRlfsP9YONYxs1r69fABAIO/eA2fC9DQ YTyk5ix2w/6bqfJAwAgWti9QFWPAI33gswNtFUjjzUSnz68fjLv3TbxqSgZnwVUrkio5 8Wqw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.23.48 with SMTP id j16mr46936183igf.34.1417606392582; Wed, 03 Dec 2014 03:33:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 22:33:12 +1100 Subject: Re: Style question: Importing modules from packages - 'from' vs 'as' From: Chris Angelico Cc: "python-list@python.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 25 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1417606395 news.xs4all.nl 2902 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:34804 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl X-Received-Bytes: 4046 X-Received-Body-CRC: 2966767113 Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:81854 On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> wrote: > Don't repeat yourself, so > > from os import path > > always. On the other hand I have never thought about actual renames, e. g. > > from os import path as stdpath > > versus > > import os.path as stdpath > > I think I'd use the latter as it looks simpler. Thanks, Peter and Tim. Keeping DRY is worth doing (the more so as it's raining as I type this...), and I won't be renaming in this, so the from-import wins - but as Tim says, it's a close race. I do like the turn-around times on this list. Although, of course, it's entirely possible there'll be a week's worth of posts coming when someone hits on a controversial subaspect of the question somewhere; any volunteers? :) :) ChrisA