Re: Intel Atom: pros/cons/hazzards?

From	Don Y <this@is.not.me.com>
Newsgroups	sci.electronics.design, comp.arch.embedded
Subject	Re: Intel Atom: pros/cons/hazzards?
Date	2014-09-21 01:27 -0700
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<lvm2b1$4dk$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(25 earlier) <lvkrko$652$1@dont-email.me> <lvl1ka$716$1@speranza.aioe.org> <lvlbqk$ek$1@dont-email.me> <lvlr5r$l0i$1@speranza.aioe.org> <lvlune$s9c$1@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 9/21/2014 12:28 AM, rickman wrote:
> On 9/21/2014 2:25 AM, Don Y wrote:

>>>>> No, you don't have to share anything.  There are any number of vendors
>>>>> who use
>>>>> GPL code and they have never shared any of it with me and they won't
>>>>> even if I
>>>>> ask... because I haven't bought their product, so they aren't
>>>>> obligated to
>>>>> share with me.
>>>>
>>>> Um, you might want to reread the terms of their license!  And, if,
>>>> indeed,
>>>> they are NOT complying with those terms, call the FSF-police and let
>>>> them badger them into compliance.
>>>
>>> No, they have no obligation to distribute source to anyone they didn't
>>> sell or give the binary code to.
>>
>> Actually, 3b suggests otherwise:
>>
>>      b) Accompany it with a written offer, valid for at least three
>>      years, to give any third party, for a charge no more than your
>> -----------^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>      cost of physically performing source distribution, a complete
>>      machine-readable copy of the corresponding source code, to be
>>      distributed under the terms of Sections 1 and 2 above on a medium
>>      customarily used for software interchange; or,
>>
>> The point is to get you involved in redistributing the GPL'd code.
>
> Only if you ship the code.

The question is:  if I make the sources available to "customer A"
under terms of the license, am I similarly required to make it available
to NONcustomer B?  "ANY third party"??

I.e., if I *sit* on the sources and only use them "internally", I
don't have to give anyone anything!  But, once I've opted to publish
or produce something (distribute it), am I obligated to provide
the GPOL'd sources to "anyone who asks"?  As long as they are willing
to pay a "duplication fee"?

>> The issue is when and how the GPL "attaches" to a work.  I.e., if I can
>> make something that has inherent freestanding value (no GPL'd code
>> included), then it is free of the GPL's taint.  (as it SHOULD BE!)
>>
>> So, unless your work is free-standing in the absence of GPL'd code,
>> you're work is probably affected!
>
> Bingo!

In practice, it's pretty hard to "modify something" and still end up with
your changes being something that is "free standing".

>> As copyright holder to a nonGPL'd work, I don't have to share with
>> *anyone* that I choose not to share with!  Or, I can change my mind
>> later.  Or, put different terms on each licensee.  My choice, entirely.
>
> No, you can't share your code and then later decide not to... unless you forbid
> those you share it with to share it again.  Is that your intent.

If I own the copyright outright -- without the terms of GPL applying -- I can
elect to sell licenses, today -- subject to the licensing restriction that
prohibits the  licensee from disclosing or otherwise making known the contents
of that licensed software.  Next week, I can decide not to sell any more
licenses!  A week later, I can elect to change the license terms to allow
licensees to "do with it as you wish".

Because there are no OTHER encumberances on MY code.

>> And THE MARKET decides who to reward/punish!  If consumers were concerned
>> about no ingredient labels on products (assuming this was legal) and
>> avoided those products, then the folks who didn't provide ingredient
>> lists would either have to change their policy or live with reduced
>> sales.
>>
>> Obviously, the free software "market" has decided that the GPL isn't the
>> solution!  If people disliked the fact that PostgreSQL isn't under the
>> GPL and *avoided* it -- in favor of MySQL (which is GPL'd, IIRC), then
>> the PostgreSQL folks would either decide to embrace the GPL *or* live
>> with the market that NOT embracing it leaves them!
>
> Really?  The market has decide?  Seems to me like there is tons of the GPL
> stuff all over the place.

The market DECIDES, not "has decided".  There is a lot of FOSS software that
is NOT GPL'd!  I.e., the "market" hasn't made a clear cut "decision".

Thread

Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-17 00:46 -0700
  Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-17 04:05 -0400
    Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? dplatt@coop.radagast.org (David Platt) - 2014-09-17 11:09 -0700
    Re: Intel Atom: pros/cons/hazzards? Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2014-09-17 22:52 -0500
  Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? mroberds@att.net - 2014-09-17 08:21 +0000
    Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-17 02:00 -0700
      Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-09-17 13:08 +0200
        Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? JW <none@dev.null> - 2014-09-17 08:24 -0400
      Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? mroberds@att.net - 2014-09-17 21:44 +0000
        Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? dplatt@coop.radagast.org (David Platt) - 2014-09-17 15:04 -0700
        Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-18 00:28 -0700
          Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-18 03:41 -0400
            Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-18 03:31 -0700
              Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-18 18:12 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-18 15:53 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-18 19:22 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-18 17:18 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? josephkk <joseph_barrett@sbcglobal.net> - 2014-09-18 21:16 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-18 21:44 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-09-19 09:19 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-19 01:36 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-09-19 11:53 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-19 03:10 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-09-19 13:02 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-19 04:26 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-09-19 13:50 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-19 10:16 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-09-20 16:42 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-20 12:19 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-09-20 21:58 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-20 13:33 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-09-20 23:00 +0000
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-20 16:14 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-09-21 02:12 +0000
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-20 20:05 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-09-21 12:45 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-20 16:34 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-20 13:41 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-20 17:29 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Dombo <dombo@disposable.invalid> - 2014-09-21 00:12 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-20 19:01 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-20 16:17 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-09-21 02:17 +0000
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-20 22:27 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2014-09-21 13:25 +0000
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Dombo <dombo@disposable.invalid> - 2014-09-21 15:56 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-09-21 18:19 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2014-09-21 09:37 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-21 14:22 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2014-09-21 23:13 +0000
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-21 14:20 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2014-09-21 23:15 +0000
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-21 20:20 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-20 16:09 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-20 22:05 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-20 23:25 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-21 03:28 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-21 01:27 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Dombo <dombo@disposable.invalid> - 2014-09-21 14:20 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-09-21 13:09 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-21 12:06 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-09-22 09:55 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Dombo <dombo@disposable.invalid> - 2014-09-20 23:54 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-20 15:46 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-20 19:09 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-20 16:29 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-20 22:11 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-20 20:40 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-21 00:56 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-20 23:40 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-21 03:35 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-21 01:47 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-21 07:33 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-21 11:56 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-21 20:32 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2014-09-22 11:03 +1000
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-21 18:18 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2014-09-22 11:53 +1000
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-21 19:05 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-21 19:05 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? krw@attt.bizz - 2014-09-21 11:50 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2014-09-21 18:50 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-21 20:09 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2014-09-21 21:25 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-21 22:12 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2014-09-23 09:38 -0500
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2014-09-22 10:15 +0100
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-22 04:59 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? krw@attt.bizz - 2014-09-22 15:38 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-09-22 10:02 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-22 01:44 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-22 05:25 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-09-22 12:44 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-22 04:33 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2014-09-22 13:00 +0100
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-22 05:02 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-09-22 15:19 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2014-09-22 14:35 +0100
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-22 07:55 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-09-22 17:35 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-22 10:06 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2014-09-22 10:25 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Hans-Bernhard Bröker <HBBroeker@t-online.de> - 2014-09-22 19:48 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-09-22 20:46 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> - 2014-10-08 12:34 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2014-10-08 13:10 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-10-08 17:31 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2014-10-08 14:53 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2014-10-08 15:06 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Stefan Reuther <stefan.news@arcor.de> - 2014-10-09 19:09 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2014-10-09 13:44 -0500
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-10-09 22:31 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> - 2014-10-09 17:29 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> - 2014-10-09 17:31 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2014-10-09 21:25 -0500
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> - 2014-10-09 23:27 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2014-10-09 21:56 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Stefan Reuther <stefan.news@arcor.de> - 2014-10-10 18:48 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2014-10-10 10:43 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? mjb@signal11.invalid (Mike) - 2014-10-11 21:25 +0100
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? krw@attt.bizz - 2014-10-10 18:27 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2014-10-11 03:05 +0000
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-22 18:43 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-09-22 23:36 +0000
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-22 16:48 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-09-23 01:05 +0000
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-22 18:47 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-09-23 02:11 +0000
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-22 22:24 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-23 00:29 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-09-23 10:07 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom: pros/cons/hazzards? Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2014-09-23 07:14 -0500
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-22 23:43 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? krw@attt.bizz - 2014-09-23 13:14 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2014-09-23 18:18 -0500
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-23 19:28 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? krw@attt.bizz - 2014-09-23 19:58 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2014-09-23 16:52 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? krw@attt.bizz - 2014-09-23 19:57 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> - 2014-10-08 12:39 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-22 18:38 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-09-22 23:41 +0000
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-22 23:27 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-09-23 05:34 +0000
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-23 02:21 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2014-09-24 09:42 -0500
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2014-09-23 09:51 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2014-09-23 18:23 -0500
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2014-09-23 16:53 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2014-09-24 08:15 -0500
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2014-09-24 10:52 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-09-24 21:51 +0000
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2014-09-24 15:57 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2014-09-23 09:52 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-23 18:19 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2014-09-23 15:33 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-23 18:38 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2014-09-23 15:59 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-23 19:03 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2014-09-24 00:15 +0100
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-23 19:30 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2014-09-23 16:56 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-09-24 02:09 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-23 20:17 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2014-09-23 17:26 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-23 21:20 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-09-23 23:42 +0000
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> - 2014-10-08 12:41 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2014-09-22 17:03 +0100
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2014-09-22 10:19 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-22 15:21 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2014-09-22 12:55 +0100
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2014-09-22 12:25 +0000
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-22 05:37 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2014-09-22 14:37 +0100
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2014-09-22 14:32 +0100
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-22 07:01 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2014-09-22 15:22 +0100
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-22 08:01 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-23 00:35 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Stef <stef33d@yahooI-N-V-A-L-I-D.com.invalid> - 2014-09-23 09:09 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom: pros/cons/hazzards? Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2014-09-23 07:16 -0500
                Re: Intel Atom: pros/cons/hazzards? Andrew Smallshaw <andrews@sdf.lonestar.org> - 2014-09-23 14:45 +0000
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2014-09-23 10:08 -0500
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2014-09-23 10:03 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-23 13:52 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-09-22 20:53 +0000
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-22 15:00 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-09-22 22:14 +0000
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-22 15:51 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2014-09-23 10:17 -0500
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-23 13:57 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-23 18:28 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-22 04:39 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? langwadt@fonz.dk - 2014-09-20 16:33 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-20 22:17 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? langwadt@fonz.dk - 2014-09-21 12:24 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-22 00:00 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2014-09-19 23:15 +0000
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2014-09-19 07:58 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-19 10:41 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2014-09-19 07:59 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-19 03:08 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-19 01:17 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? josephkk <joseph_barrett@sbcglobal.net> - 2014-09-19 21:15 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom: pros/cons/hazzards? Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2014-09-20 14:36 -0500
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? "Boudewijn Dijkstra" <sp4mtr4p.boudewijn@indes.com> - 2014-09-19 10:02 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-19 04:20 -0400
          Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? "Boudewijn Dijkstra" <sp4mtr4p.boudewijn@indes.com> - 2014-09-18 16:20 +0200
            Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-18 10:25 -0700
              Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? "Boudewijn Dijkstra" <sp4mtr4p.boudewijn@indes.com> - 2014-09-19 09:36 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-19 01:27 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? josephkk <joseph_barrett@sbcglobal.net> - 2014-09-19 21:35 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-20 11:54 -0700
          Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? mroberds@att.net - 2014-09-18 19:33 +0000
            Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-18 13:18 -0700
          Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Przemek Klosowski <przemek@tux.dot.org> - 2014-09-21 12:34 +0000
            Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? krw@attt.bizz - 2014-09-21 11:54 -0400
    Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? edward.ming.lee@gmail.com - 2014-09-17 08:10 -0700
    Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2014-09-17 15:11 +0000
    Re: Intel Atom: pros/cons/hazzards? Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2014-09-17 22:53 -0500
  Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2014-09-17 13:33 -0700
    Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2014-09-18 03:35 -0500
  Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Allan Herriman <allanherriman@hotmail.com> - 2014-09-18 13:16 +0000
  Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> - 2014-09-25 13:51 +0300
    Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? dplatt@coop.radagast.org (David Platt) - 2014-09-25 09:58 -0700
      Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> - 2014-09-29 21:46 +0300
    Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-25 10:07 -0700
      Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-25 18:32 -0400
  Re: Intel Atom: pros/cons/hazzards? "Daniel Mandic" <daniel_mandic@hotmail.com> - 2014-10-10 09:53 +0000

csiph-web