Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #17998

Re: Which operation is more expensive?(a <= b and a != 0)

Show all headers | View raw

Ping Cheu <nospam@nospam.com> writes:
> From a web-site that teaches optimization for c,
>
> I saw bellow optimization rule.
>
[snip]
>
> The author say 'fact2_func' is faster than 'fact1_func'.
>
> That means 'i <= n' operation is more expensive than 'i != 0'.
>
> So far, I thought all condition statements have same cost.
>
> So I want to know the cost of condition states from the fast one to slow 
> one.
>
> Can anyone tell me? 

No.

The C language standard says absolutely nothing about the relative
performance of different operations.

It may be the case that "i <= n" will be more expensive than "i !=0"
on some particular system.  On another system, they might take
the same time, or "i != 0" might even be more expensive.

If I had to guess, I'd say that "i != 0" is likely to be slightly
faster, or at least no slower, since it only has to load one variable
rather than two before doing the comparison.

On the other hand, a decent optimizing compiler might generate equally
good code for both.

But *I don't have to guess*.  I can measure it -- which is what you
should do if the performance matters.

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org  <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
    Will write code for food.
"We must do something.  This is something.  Therefore, we must do this."
    -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Which operation is more expensive?(a <= b and a != 0) Ping Cheu <nospam@nospam.com> - 2012-02-27 21:24 +0000
  Re: Which operation is more expensive?(a <= b and a != 0) James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-02-27 16:47 -0500
    Re: Which operation is more expensive?(a <= b and a != 0) Michael Angelo Ravera <maravera@prodigy.net> - 2012-03-07 04:23 -0800
  Re: Which operation is more expensive?(a <= b and a != 0) Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-02-27 13:54 -0800
    Re: Which operation is more expensive?(a <= b and a != 0) falk@rahul.net (Edward A. Falk) - 2012-02-27 23:47 +0000
  Re: Which operation is more expensive?(a <= b and a != 0) Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2012-02-27 16:57 -0500
    Re: Which operation is more expensive?(a <= b and a != 0) Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-02-28 13:43 -0600
  Re: Which operation is more expensive?(a <= b and a != 0) Richard Damon <news.x.richarddamon@xoxy.net> - 2012-02-27 16:58 -0500
  Re: Which operation is more expensive?(a <= b and a != 0) Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-02-27 13:55 -0800
    Re: Which operation is more expensive?(a <= b and a != 0) Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2012-03-03 15:58 -0500
  Re: Which operation is more expensive?(a <= b and a != 0) Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-02-27 14:17 -0800
  Re: Which operation is more expensive?(a <= b and a != 0) Barry Schwarz <schwarz45@yahoo.com> - 2012-02-27 14:52 -0800
    Re: Which operation is more expensive?(a <= b and a != 0) Peter Nilsson <airia@acay.com.au> - 2012-02-27 18:16 -0800
      Re: Which operation is more expensive?(a <= b and a != 0) qarnos <darrencubitt@gmail.com> - 2012-02-29 12:20 -0800
      Re: Which operation is more expensive?(a <= b and a != 0) Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2012-03-13 22:07 -0700
  Re: Which operation is more expensive?(a <= b and a != 0) Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-02-28 00:56 +0000
  Re: Which operation is more expensive?(a <= b and a != 0) Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2012-02-27 19:18 -0700
    Re: Which operation is more expensive?(a <= b and a != 0) China Blue Sea <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2012-02-27 18:30 -0800
  Re: Which operation is more expensive?(a <= b and a != 0) "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-02-28 13:22 +0000
  Re: Which operation is more expensive?(a <= b and a != 0) Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-02-28 13:38 -0600
  Re: Which operation is more expensive?(a <= b and a != 0) jgk@panix.com (Joe keane) - 2012-02-28 22:35 +0000
    Re: Which operation is more expensive?(a <= b and a != 0) Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-03 01:36 +0200
      Re: Which operation is more expensive?(a <= b and a != 0) jgk@panix.com (Joe keane) - 2012-03-05 20:03 +0000
        Re: Which operation is more expensive?(a <= b and a != 0) Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-12 01:08 +0200
          Re: Which operation is more expensive?(a <= b and a != 0) Harald van Dijk <haraldvdijk@gmail.com> - 2012-03-12 00:05 -0700
            Re: Which operation is more expensive?(a <= b and a != 0) James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-03-12 08:59 -0400
              Re: Which operation is more expensive?(a <= b and a != 0) gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2012-03-12 06:24 -0700
                Re: Which operation is more expensive?(a <= b and a != 0) James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-03-12 10:13 -0400
                Re: Which operation is more expensive?(a <= b and a != 0) Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-03-12 10:44 -0700
                Re: Which operation is more expensive?(a <= b and a != 0) Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-13 17:12 +0200
          Re: Which operation is more expensive?(a <= b and a != 0) Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-03-12 11:20 -0700

csiph-web