Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #2384
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming.threads, comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: Paper about RCU (Read-Copy Update) |
| Date | 2014-05-29 18:11 -0700 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <lm8lso$7e9$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <lm09ba$89v$1@news.albasani.net> <lm6ocd$9gc$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
> "Chris M. Thomasson" wrote in message > news:lm6ocd$9gc$1@speranza.aioe.org... > If you can create a rw-mutex that is not > asymmetrical, aka prior art, that beats a > virtually zero overhead read region... > Well, then I am all ears and eyes! I HIGHLY doubt that using one of your rw-mutexs will beat a RCU implementation. Have you actually benchmarked anything?
Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Paper about RCU (Read-Copy Update) aminer <aminer@toto.net> - 2014-05-26 16:49 -0700
Re: Paper about RCU (Read-Copy Update) aminer <aminer@toto.net> - 2014-05-26 17:14 -0700
Re: Paper about RCU (Read-Copy Update) "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> - 2014-05-29 00:41 -0700
Re: Paper about RCU (Read-Copy Update) "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> - 2014-05-29 18:11 -0700
csiph-web