Groups > comp.programming.threads > #2384

Re: Paper about RCU (Read-Copy Update)

Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.datemas.de!rt.uk.eu.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	"Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.programming.threads, comp.programming
Subject	Re: Paper about RCU (Read-Copy Update)
Date	Thu, 29 May 2014 18:11:33 -0700
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines	13
Message-ID	<lm8lso$7e9$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	<lm09ba$89v$1@news.albasani.net> <lm6ocd$9gc$1@speranza.aioe.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host	PomiWpvG4e2y0HvOhU0dhw.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Complaints-To	abuse@aioe.org
X-MimeOLE	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3555.308
X-Notice	Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
X-Newsreader	Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3555.308
Importance	Normal
X-Priority	3
X-MSMail-Priority	Normal
Xref	csiph.com comp.programming.threads:2384 comp.programming:4466

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

> "Chris M. Thomasson"  wrote in message 
> news:lm6ocd$9gc$1@speranza.aioe.org...

> If you can create a rw-mutex that is not
> asymmetrical, aka prior art, that beats a
> virtually zero overhead read region...

> Well, then I am all ears and eyes!

I HIGHLY doubt that using one of your rw-mutexs
will beat a RCU implementation. Have you actually
benchmarked anything?

Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Paper about RCU (Read-Copy Update) aminer <aminer@toto.net> - 2014-05-26 16:49 -0700
  Re: Paper about RCU (Read-Copy Update) aminer <aminer@toto.net> - 2014-05-26 17:14 -0700
  Re: Paper about RCU (Read-Copy Update) "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> - 2014-05-29 00:41 -0700
    Re: Paper about RCU (Read-Copy Update) "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> - 2014-05-29 18:11 -0700

csiph-web