Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.networking > #2956
| From | "S.K.R. de Jong" <SKRdJ@nowhere.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.networking |
| Subject | Re: Hurting email spammers with iptables |
| Date | 2014-05-18 02:53 +0000 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <ll97bo$j80$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
| References | <ll5q0p$v6f$1@news.albasani.net> <slrnlndbe8.bre.BitTwister@wb.home.test> <ll8184$125$1@news.albasani.net> <slrnlnf2ui.qvh.BitTwister@wb.home.test> |
On Sat, 17 May 2014 16:18:26 +0000, Bit Twister wrote: > On Sat, 17 May 2014 16:03:16 +0000 (UTC), S.K.R. de Jong wrote: >> >> So, if you use the scheme described in >> http://www.benzedrine.cx/relaydb.html >> you might end up in the big house? > > That link points to a passive response. Your post seemed to indicate an > aggressive response. Your system not responding is not going to get you > into any law enforcement trouble. > >> What I am talking about is similar to that, but with ip tables instead. > > Offhand, I would think just trying to set rules for each undesired ip > address will get pretty large and degrade performance. Be it as it may, what ip tables rules would accomplish something similar to what is described in the link?
Back to comp.os.linux.networking | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Hurting email spammers with iptables "S.K.R. de Jong" <SKRdJ@nowhere.net> - 2014-05-16 19:47 +0000
Re: Hurting email spammers with iptables Bit Twister <BitTwister@mouse-potato.com> - 2014-05-17 00:31 +0000
Re: Hurting email spammers with iptables "S.K.R. de Jong" <SKRdJ@nowhere.net> - 2014-05-17 16:03 +0000
Re: Hurting email spammers with iptables Bit Twister <BitTwister@mouse-potato.com> - 2014-05-17 16:18 +0000
Re: Hurting email spammers with iptables "S.K.R. de Jong" <SKRdJ@nowhere.net> - 2014-05-18 02:53 +0000
Re: Hurting email spammers with iptables Doug Laidlaw <laidlaws@hotkey.net.au> - 2014-05-23 04:09 +1000
Re: Hurting email spammers with iptables "S.K.R. de Jong" <SKRdJ@nowhere.net> - 2014-05-23 14:12 +0000
Re: Hurting email spammers with iptables Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2014-05-23 16:30 +0100
Re: Hurting email spammers with iptables detha <detha@foad.co.za> - 2014-05-18 09:22 +0200
Re: Hurting email spammers with iptables "S.K.R. de Jong" <SKRdJ@nowhere.net> - 2014-05-18 14:26 +0000
Re: Hurting email spammers with iptables buck <buck@private.mil> - 2014-05-18 18:27 +0000
Re: Hurting email spammers with iptables "S.K.R. de Jong" <SKRdJ@nowhere.net> - 2014-08-11 17:20 +0000
csiph-web