Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.networking > #2959
| From | buck <buck@private.mil> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.networking |
| Subject | Re: Hurting email spammers with iptables |
| Date | 2014-05-18 18:27 +0000 |
| Organization | Say What? |
| Message-ID | <llau390292k@news6.newsguy.com> (permalink) |
| References | <ll5q0p$v6f$1@news.albasani.net> <53785f9e$0$3350$862e30e2@ngroups.net> <llafu7$l26$1@news.albasani.net> |
"S.K.R. de Jong" <SKRdJ@nowhere.net> wrote in news:llafu7$l26$1 @news.albasani.net: > On Sun, 18 May 2014 09:22:05 +0200, detha wrote: > >>> Would it be possible, with iptables, so arrange things on my side >>> so that resources are potentially indefinitely consumed at the system >>> with the IP address from which the spam is being sent? >> You are probably looking for the '-j TARPIT' target. Most distributions >> don't include that by default (because it is too easy to shoot yourself >> in the foot with it - every active tarpit consumes resources on /your/ >> server, and it opens you up to being DDOSed just by opening a bunch of >> connections to a tarpit'ed port). >> >> Some have it as a kernel module (e.g. Debian has it in the >> xtables-addons-common package). > > Thanks. This seems to be pretty much what I was looking for. TARPIT does not work, at least not as you desire. That's because it shrinks the window, which causes the sender to send a TCP reset (RST), closing the connection. The original idea was to allow the spammer to connect to your SMTP server and then set the window to one byte, so that each packet contains 1 byte, causing the transaction to take FOREVER to send even a small message. But when spammers figured that out, they just changed the TCP software to terminate the connection (RST) and go on to the next victim. -- buck
Back to comp.os.linux.networking | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Hurting email spammers with iptables "S.K.R. de Jong" <SKRdJ@nowhere.net> - 2014-05-16 19:47 +0000
Re: Hurting email spammers with iptables Bit Twister <BitTwister@mouse-potato.com> - 2014-05-17 00:31 +0000
Re: Hurting email spammers with iptables "S.K.R. de Jong" <SKRdJ@nowhere.net> - 2014-05-17 16:03 +0000
Re: Hurting email spammers with iptables Bit Twister <BitTwister@mouse-potato.com> - 2014-05-17 16:18 +0000
Re: Hurting email spammers with iptables "S.K.R. de Jong" <SKRdJ@nowhere.net> - 2014-05-18 02:53 +0000
Re: Hurting email spammers with iptables Doug Laidlaw <laidlaws@hotkey.net.au> - 2014-05-23 04:09 +1000
Re: Hurting email spammers with iptables "S.K.R. de Jong" <SKRdJ@nowhere.net> - 2014-05-23 14:12 +0000
Re: Hurting email spammers with iptables Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2014-05-23 16:30 +0100
Re: Hurting email spammers with iptables detha <detha@foad.co.za> - 2014-05-18 09:22 +0200
Re: Hurting email spammers with iptables "S.K.R. de Jong" <SKRdJ@nowhere.net> - 2014-05-18 14:26 +0000
Re: Hurting email spammers with iptables buck <buck@private.mil> - 2014-05-18 18:27 +0000
Re: Hurting email spammers with iptables "S.K.R. de Jong" <SKRdJ@nowhere.net> - 2014-08-11 17:20 +0000
csiph-web