Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | scott@alfter.diespammersdie.us (Scott Alfter) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks |
| Date | 2014-05-15 17:27 +0000 |
| Organization | USS Voyager NCC-74656, Delta Quadrant |
| Message-ID | <ll2tdg$1r1$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <lkvedn$1c6$1@solani.org> <ll29l7$5if$2@solani.org> <5374b81a$0$61240$c3e8da3$5e5e430d@news.astraweb.com> <20140515155348.022768f5.rsw@therandymon.com> |
In article <20140515155348.022768f5.rsw@therandymon.com>, RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> wrote: >On 15 May 2014 12:50:34 GMT >Rich <rich@example.com> wrote: >> It is also possible, although this seems unlikely today, that he simply >> prints hardcopy to send to the publisher. > >It's coming back! Check it out: somebody at Soylent just linked to >this: a modern version that hopes to re-implement Wordstar. It's called >wordtsar. >http://wordtsar.ca The text editor that came with DR DOS 6 and up supported some of Wordstar's command set: http://www.drdos.net/documentation/usergeng/06ugch6.htm >This chapter describes how to use EDIT, a menu-based editor which you can >use to create and edit text files. You can use a keyboard or mouse, and >there are shorthand forms for some of the common commands, including >WordStar* compatible commands. I had never used Wordstar, but EDIT was easy enough to pick up. Upon switching to Linux, I found that joe was eerily similar to EDIT, much smaller than Emacs, and easier to use than vi: http://joe-editor.sourceforge.net/ >JOE is a full featured terminal-based screen editor which is distributed >under the GNU General Public License (GPL). JOE has been around since 1988 >and comes standard with many Linux distributions. > >JOE is a blending of MicroPro's venerable microcomputer word processor >WordStar and Richard Stallman's famous LISP based text editor GNU-EMACS (but >it does not use code from either program): most of the basic editing keys >are the same as in WordStar as is the overall feel of the editor. JOE also >has some of the key bindings and many of the powerful features of EMACS. It's what I'm using right now to type this reply. :-) It runs on nearly anything; I've run it on Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows. Other than running in a terminal window, I suspect it's pretty close to what WordTsar is aiming to do. _/_ / v \ Scott Alfter (remove the obvious to send mail) (IIGS( http://alfter.us/ Top-posting! \_^_/ >What's the most annoying thing on Usenet?
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Wordstar on DOS still rocks RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-05-14 09:52 +0000
Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks sail0r <sail0r@example.com> - 2014-05-14 23:31 -0400
Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> - 2014-05-15 07:02 +0000
Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks Hils <hils@saynotospam.net> - 2014-05-15 08:31 +0100
Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-05-15 11:50 +0000
Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks Rich <rich@example.com> - 2014-05-15 12:50 +0000
Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-05-15 15:53 +0000
Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks scott@alfter.diespammersdie.us (Scott Alfter) - 2014-05-15 17:27 +0000
Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks Rich <rich@example.com> - 2014-05-15 18:10 +0000
Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-05-16 03:53 +0000
Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-05-15 15:59 +0000
Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> - 2014-05-15 17:08 +0000
Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-05-15 23:31 +0000
Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks David Harmon <source@netcom.com> - 2014-05-15 18:02 -0700
Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-05-16 03:56 +0000
Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks David Harmon <source@netcom.com> - 2014-05-19 11:30 -0700
Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> - 2014-05-16 06:06 +0000
Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> - 2014-05-19 23:14 +0300
Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-05-19 23:12 +0000
Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-05-15 15:59 +0000
Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks scott@alfter.diespammersdie.us (Scott Alfter) - 2014-05-15 17:10 +0000
Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks Rich <rich@example.com> - 2014-05-15 17:55 +0000
Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-05-15 23:33 +0000
Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks "John" <j@j.j> - 2014-05-22 10:32 -0700
Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks Peter Percival <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2014-05-16 09:59 +0100
Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-05-18 19:01 +0200
Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks Peter Percival <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2014-05-16 18:10 +0100
Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-05-18 14:11 +0000
Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks Peter Percival <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2014-05-18 16:18 +0100
csiph-web