Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.misc > #2851

Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks

Show all headers | View raw

In message <ll2tdg$1r1$1@dont-email.me> 
  Scott Alfter <scott@alfter.diespammersdie.us> wrote:
> In article <20140515155348.022768f5.rsw@therandymon.com>,
> RS Wood  <rsw@therandymon.com> wrote:
>>On 15 May 2014 12:50:34 GMT
>>Rich <rich@example.com> wrote:
>>> It is also possible, although this seems unlikely today, that he simply
>>> prints hardcopy to send to the publisher.
>>
>>It's coming back!  Check it out: somebody at Soylent just linked to
>>this: a modern version that hopes to re-implement Wordstar.  It's called
>>wordtsar.
>>http://wordtsar.ca

> The text editor that came with DR DOS 6 and up supported some of Wordstar's
> command set:

> http://www.drdos.net/documentation/usergeng/06ugch6.htm

>>This chapter describes how to use EDIT, a menu-based editor which you can
>>use to create and edit text files. You can use a keyboard or mouse, and
>>there are shorthand forms for some of the common commands, including
>>WordStar* compatible commands.

> I had never used Wordstar, but EDIT was easy enough to pick up.  Upon
> switching to Linux, I found that joe was eerily similar to EDIT, much
> smaller than Emacs, and easier to use than vi:

> http://joe-editor.sourceforge.net/

>>JOE is a full featured terminal-based screen editor which is distributed
>>under the GNU General Public License (GPL). JOE has been around since 1988
>>and comes standard with many Linux distributions.
>>
>>JOE is a blending of MicroPro's venerable microcomputer word processor
>>WordStar and Richard Stallman's famous LISP based text editor GNU-EMACS (but
>>it does not use code from either program): most of the basic editing keys
>>are the same as in WordStar as is the overall feel of the editor. JOE also
>>has some of the key bindings and many of the powerful features of EMACS.

> It's what I'm using right now to type this reply. :-) It runs on nearly
> anything; I've run it on Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.  Other than running
> in a terminal window, I suspect it's pretty close to what WordTsar is aiming
> to do.

Joe is not bad, but for people who want a simple editor I point them at
nano instead because it is simple like joe, but it also has a lot of
advanced features that you can use if you want them.

I use vim for myself, or BBEdit.




-- 
"A common mistake people make when trying to design something completely
foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.: -
Douglas Adams

Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Wordstar on DOS still rocks RS Wood  <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-05-14 09:52 +0000
  Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks sail0r <sail0r@example.com> - 2014-05-14 23:31 -0400
    Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> - 2014-05-15 07:02 +0000
      Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks Hils <hils@saynotospam.net> - 2014-05-15 08:31 +0100
        Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-05-15 11:50 +0000
          Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks Rich <rich@example.com> - 2014-05-15 12:50 +0000
            Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-05-15 15:53 +0000
              Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks scott@alfter.diespammersdie.us (Scott Alfter) - 2014-05-15 17:27 +0000
                Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks Rich <rich@example.com> - 2014-05-15 18:10 +0000
                Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-05-16 03:53 +0000
      Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-05-15 15:59 +0000
        Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> - 2014-05-15 17:08 +0000
          Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-05-15 23:31 +0000
            Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks David Harmon <source@netcom.com> - 2014-05-15 18:02 -0700
              Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-05-16 03:56 +0000
                Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks David Harmon <source@netcom.com> - 2014-05-19 11:30 -0700
            Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> - 2014-05-16 06:06 +0000
        Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> - 2014-05-19 23:14 +0300
          Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-05-19 23:12 +0000
    Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-05-15 15:59 +0000
    Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks scott@alfter.diespammersdie.us (Scott Alfter) - 2014-05-15 17:10 +0000
      Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks Rich <rich@example.com> - 2014-05-15 17:55 +0000
        Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-05-15 23:33 +0000
          Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks "John" <j@j.j> - 2014-05-22 10:32 -0700
  Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks Peter Percival <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2014-05-16 09:59 +0100
    Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-05-18 19:01 +0200
  Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks Peter Percival <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2014-05-16 18:10 +0100
    Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-05-18 14:11 +0000
      Re: Wordstar on DOS still rocks Peter Percival <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> - 2014-05-18 16:18 +0100

csiph-web