Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: pointers and pointing |
| Date | 2014-04-22 07:38 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <lj5kcf$1p3$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <lj3m6d$meq$1@dont-email.me> <rfqal9lmqc2a7i1kcs7s6laug96jd4p2to@4ax.com> <lj45rt$cca$1@dont-email.me> <mtpbl9t2ahpbmc14ipu0i2a0uu91dvgbdq@4ax.com> <lj501a$2in$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
On 04/22/2014 01:51 AM, glen herrmannsfeldt wrote: > Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> wrote: >> On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 18:25:03 -0400, "Bill Cunningham" >> <nospam@nspam.invalid> wrote: > >>> I don't know Barry the thing about clc is that when you ask a >>> question and 3 people respond you will get 3 different answers. >>> And people will lie to you > >> When you ask a poorly worded question, you should expect a variety of >> answers since people will make different assumptions about what you >> really meant. > > I have known people to give unusual answers when people ask what > look like homework questions. Not usually wrong, but not always > completely useful. In my experience, completely useless and even seriously wrong code is not an unusual response when someone asks us to do their homework for them. This should not be confused with proper requests for help with homework, including explanations of what the poster has already tried to do, and explanations of what it is they don't understand about why it didn't work. Such questions generate lots of sincerely helpful responses. > But I don't remember any such misleading answers in this thread. I can't remember anyone doing anything like that when answering Bill. The most plausible explanation for Bill that assumes he is a troll, also implies that he actually understands C far better than he pretends to, which would render such responses pointless. Those responses are for lazy clueless newbies, not trolls. -- James Kuyper
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
pointers and pointing "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-04-21 13:57 -0400
Re: pointers and pointing Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2014-04-21 11:58 -0700
Re: pointers and pointing "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-04-21 15:09 -0400
Re: pointers and pointing buja <buja66@gmail.com> - 2014-04-21 12:44 -0700
Re: pointers and pointing gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2014-04-21 20:28 +0000
Re: pointers and pointing "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2014-04-21 15:43 -0500
Re: pointers and pointing Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2014-04-22 10:28 -0400
Re: pointers and pointing ralph <nt_consulting@yahoo.com> - 2014-04-21 16:25 -0500
Re: pointers and pointing Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2014-04-21 15:14 -0700
Re: pointers and pointing James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-04-21 18:41 -0400
Re: pointers and pointing gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2014-04-21 22:48 +0000
Re: pointers and pointing jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2014-04-22 00:22 +0200
Re: pointers and pointing "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-04-21 18:25 -0400
Re: pointers and pointing Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2014-04-21 20:56 -0700
Re: pointers and pointing glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-04-22 05:51 +0000
Re: pointers and pointing James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-04-22 07:38 -0400
Re: pointers and pointing David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-04-22 09:16 +0200
Re: pointers and pointing "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-04-22 09:37 -0400
Re: pointers and pointing Richard <rgrdev_@gmail.com> - 2014-04-22 15:00 +0100
Re: pointers and pointing Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2014-04-22 10:36 -0400
Re: pointers and pointing "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-04-22 14:09 -0400
Re: pointers and pointing Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-04-22 22:40 +0100
Re: pointers and pointing Richard <rgrdev_@gmail.com> - 2014-04-23 00:05 +0100
Re: pointers and pointing Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2014-04-22 16:08 -0700
Re: pointers and pointing "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-04-23 22:19 -0400
Re: pointers and pointing "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-04-22 14:22 -0400
Re: pointers and pointing "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-04-22 14:24 -0400
Re: pointers and pointing buja <buja66@gmail.com> - 2014-04-22 13:12 -0700
csiph-web