Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Richard <rgrdev_@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: pointers and pointing |
| Date | 2014-04-22 15:00 +0100 |
| Organization | http://www.ieee.org/ |
| Message-ID | <87zjjdlb13.fsf@gmail.com> (permalink) |
| References | <lj3m6d$meq$1@dont-email.me> <rfqal9lmqc2a7i1kcs7s6laug96jd4p2to@4ax.com> <lj45rt$cca$1@dont-email.me> <mtpbl9t2ahpbmc14ipu0i2a0uu91dvgbdq@4ax.com> <lj5ran$hea$1@dont-email.me> |
"Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> writes: > Barry Schwarz wrote: >> On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 18:25:03 -0400, "Bill Cunningham" >> <nospam@nspam.invalid> wrote: >> >>> I don't know Barry the thing about clc is that when you ask a >>> question and 3 people respond you will get 3 different answers. And >>> people will lie to you >> >> When you ask a poorly worded question, you should expect a variety of >> answers since people will make different assumptions about what you >> really meant. >> >>> too with some exceptions. I have had people fuck with me and lie >>> about the way things work. But you must remember the only time you >>> can come to clc for >> >> I've seen people post incorrect responses, including myself, without >> malice but the only person I've seen deliberately lie here is you. > > What did I deliberately lie about. This has been long in the past > someone said to do something when I did they laughed. It didn't work out so > good. That was long ago. > >>> help is when you do not need it. When there is a *problem* and you >>> have *solved* it; well then you can come to clc. >> >> And yet you keep coming back even though your problems are never >> solved. > > Then I must not have grasped something. People have many times talked > right over my head. I have had a variety of problems yes. Right now my > concern is the difference in pointer notation. If that makes any sense. I've > used it as far as I've do it by following book but I've never understood > fully the power of pointers and how to mechanically use them. Perl and > python do no good in the *nix system interface. > > Bill > > int *p; > > Ok when do I use p and when do I use *p. That right now I am working on. > LOL. Surely not even the regular gasbags are going to bother replying to this one! 1/10 -- "Avoid hyperbole at all costs, its the most destructive argument on the planet" - Mark McIntyre in comp.lang.c
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
pointers and pointing "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-04-21 13:57 -0400
Re: pointers and pointing Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2014-04-21 11:58 -0700
Re: pointers and pointing "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-04-21 15:09 -0400
Re: pointers and pointing buja <buja66@gmail.com> - 2014-04-21 12:44 -0700
Re: pointers and pointing gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2014-04-21 20:28 +0000
Re: pointers and pointing "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2014-04-21 15:43 -0500
Re: pointers and pointing Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2014-04-22 10:28 -0400
Re: pointers and pointing ralph <nt_consulting@yahoo.com> - 2014-04-21 16:25 -0500
Re: pointers and pointing Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2014-04-21 15:14 -0700
Re: pointers and pointing James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-04-21 18:41 -0400
Re: pointers and pointing gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2014-04-21 22:48 +0000
Re: pointers and pointing jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2014-04-22 00:22 +0200
Re: pointers and pointing "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-04-21 18:25 -0400
Re: pointers and pointing Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2014-04-21 20:56 -0700
Re: pointers and pointing glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-04-22 05:51 +0000
Re: pointers and pointing James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-04-22 07:38 -0400
Re: pointers and pointing David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-04-22 09:16 +0200
Re: pointers and pointing "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-04-22 09:37 -0400
Re: pointers and pointing Richard <rgrdev_@gmail.com> - 2014-04-22 15:00 +0100
Re: pointers and pointing Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2014-04-22 10:36 -0400
Re: pointers and pointing "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-04-22 14:09 -0400
Re: pointers and pointing Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-04-22 22:40 +0100
Re: pointers and pointing Richard <rgrdev_@gmail.com> - 2014-04-23 00:05 +0100
Re: pointers and pointing Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2014-04-22 16:08 -0700
Re: pointers and pointing "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-04-23 22:19 -0400
Re: pointers and pointing "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-04-22 14:22 -0400
Re: pointers and pointing "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-04-22 14:24 -0400
Re: pointers and pointing buja <buja66@gmail.com> - 2014-04-22 13:12 -0700
csiph-web