Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: pointers and pointing |
| Date | 2014-04-22 09:16 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <lj550i$3tr$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <lj3m6d$meq$1@dont-email.me> <rfqal9lmqc2a7i1kcs7s6laug96jd4p2to@4ax.com> <lj45rt$cca$1@dont-email.me> <mtpbl9t2ahpbmc14ipu0i2a0uu91dvgbdq@4ax.com> |
On 22/04/14 05:56, Barry Schwarz wrote: > On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 18:25:03 -0400, "Bill Cunningham" > <nospam@nspam.invalid> wrote: > >> I don't know Barry the thing about clc is that when you ask a question and 3 >> people respond you will get 3 different answers. And people will lie to you > > When you ask a poorly worded question, you should expect a variety of > answers since people will make different assumptions about what you > really meant. When you ask a well-worded question, you can also often expect a variety of answers - often there is no simple answer to a good question. And even if there is only one real answer, different people will express it in different ways. The variety of answers you get here is one of the strengths of this group. > >> too with some exceptions. I have had people fuck with me and lie about the >> way things work. But you must remember the only time you can come to clc for > > I've seen people post incorrect responses, including myself, without > malice but the only person I've seen deliberately lie here is you. Agreed - lying or deliberately misleading is rare here (except for the occasional obvious sarcastic reply). There are a few people who are either deliberately trolling, or determined to remain ignorant no matter how many times the facts are explained - such posters are arguably lying, but it is usually quite clear to everyone else where the consensus opinion lies, so it is not a source of confusion. And yes, some people make mistakes - even the most experienced C experts get things wrong on occasion. But typically mistakes get corrected quickly in this group (that's another of its strengths). > >> help is when you do not need it. When there is a *problem* and you have >> *solved* it; well then you can come to clc. > > And yet you keep coming back even though your problems are never > solved. >
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
pointers and pointing "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-04-21 13:57 -0400
Re: pointers and pointing Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2014-04-21 11:58 -0700
Re: pointers and pointing "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-04-21 15:09 -0400
Re: pointers and pointing buja <buja66@gmail.com> - 2014-04-21 12:44 -0700
Re: pointers and pointing gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2014-04-21 20:28 +0000
Re: pointers and pointing "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2014-04-21 15:43 -0500
Re: pointers and pointing Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2014-04-22 10:28 -0400
Re: pointers and pointing ralph <nt_consulting@yahoo.com> - 2014-04-21 16:25 -0500
Re: pointers and pointing Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2014-04-21 15:14 -0700
Re: pointers and pointing James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-04-21 18:41 -0400
Re: pointers and pointing gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2014-04-21 22:48 +0000
Re: pointers and pointing jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2014-04-22 00:22 +0200
Re: pointers and pointing "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-04-21 18:25 -0400
Re: pointers and pointing Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2014-04-21 20:56 -0700
Re: pointers and pointing glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-04-22 05:51 +0000
Re: pointers and pointing James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-04-22 07:38 -0400
Re: pointers and pointing David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-04-22 09:16 +0200
Re: pointers and pointing "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-04-22 09:37 -0400
Re: pointers and pointing Richard <rgrdev_@gmail.com> - 2014-04-22 15:00 +0100
Re: pointers and pointing Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2014-04-22 10:36 -0400
Re: pointers and pointing "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-04-22 14:09 -0400
Re: pointers and pointing Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-04-22 22:40 +0100
Re: pointers and pointing Richard <rgrdev_@gmail.com> - 2014-04-23 00:05 +0100
Re: pointers and pointing Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2014-04-22 16:08 -0700
Re: pointers and pointing "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-04-23 22:19 -0400
Re: pointers and pointing "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-04-22 14:22 -0400
Re: pointers and pointing "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-04-22 14:24 -0400
Re: pointers and pointing buja <buja66@gmail.com> - 2014-04-22 13:12 -0700
csiph-web