Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.misc > #1617

Re: [CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works"

Show all headers | View raw

On 2014-03-14 16:55:06 +0000, greymausg said:

> On 2014-03-14, Morten Nygaard Åsnes <mnaasnes@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 2014-03-14, Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> wrote:
>>> You know of a better search engine? Because I'd like to try it.
>> 
>> None are better than Google at actual searching, but DuckDuckGo.com and
>> Startpage.com are two privacy oriented alternatives that are "good enough".
>> Startpage.com uses the google search engine, so it should give similar
>> results (but not the same results as regular google search, because it
>> strips out all identifying information that Google uses to personalize its
>> results).
>> 
> 
> Those would never be honeypots for those who want to avoid interest?...
> No, never, they just would'nt do that, would they?
> 
> Sroogle (sp?) used  to be advertised as untraced Google.

Duck Duck Go is a great search engine.  They pull results from many 
sources, they have a very good anti-SEO scheme, and they have all kinds 
of neat little command line type shortcuts you can put into your 
searches to save time.  Much better than Google.  With Google you can 
search for most anything and get millions of hits, mostly unrelated to 
your search.  With DDG you might only get 50 results but they are 
almost always much more relevant.

Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works" RS Wood  <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-03-13 09:08 +0000
  Re: [CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works" Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-13 22:51 -0700
    Re: [CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works" Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2014-03-14 09:56 +0000
      Re: [CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works" Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2014-03-14 10:56 +0000
        Re: [CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works" Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2014-03-14 11:35 +0000
          Re: [CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works" Morten Nygaard Åsnes <mnaasnes@gmail.com> - 2014-03-14 13:41 +0100
            Re: [CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works" greymausg <maus@mail.com> - 2014-03-14 16:55 +0000
              Re: [CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works" Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-14 13:20 -0700
          Re: [CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works" Johny B Good <johnny-b-good@invalid.ntlworld.com> - 2014-03-14 16:51 +0000
            Re: [CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works" Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-03-16 05:34 +0100
              Re: [CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works" greymausg <maus@mail.com> - 2014-03-16 10:55 +0000
                Re: [CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works" Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-03-16 19:40 +0100
          Re: [CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works" Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2014-03-15 20:24 +0000
        Re: [CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works" Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-03-16 05:16 +0100
          Re: [CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works" Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-17 16:54 -0700
      Re: [CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works" Johny B Good <johnny-b-good@invalid.ntlworld.com> - 2014-03-14 16:38 +0000

csiph-web