Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.misc > #1605

Re: [CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works"

From greymausg <maus@mail.com>
Newsgroups comp.misc
Subject Re: [CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works"
Date 2014-03-14 16:55 +0000
Message-ID <slrnli6bpu.37b.maus@gmaus.org> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <lfu5cv$p47$1@dont-email.me> <lb0bva-kui.ln1@squidward.local.dionic.net> <20140314065604@news.eternal-september.org> <p56bva-cgl.ln1@squidward.local.dionic.net> <slrnli5u8g.65c.mnaasnes@teamroboto.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 2014-03-14, Morten Nygaard Åsnes <mnaasnes@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2014-03-14, Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> wrote:
>> You know of a better search engine? Because I'd like to try it.
>
> None are better than Google at actual searching, but DuckDuckGo.com and 
> Startpage.com are two privacy oriented alternatives that are "good enough".
> Startpage.com uses the google search engine, so it should give similar 
> results (but not the same results as regular google search, because it 
> strips out all identifying information that Google uses to personalize its
> results).
>

Those would never be honeypots for those who want to avoid interest?...
No, never, they just would'nt do that, would they?

Sroogle (sp?) used  to be advertised as untraced Google.




-- 
maus
 .
  .
...

Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works" RS Wood  <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-03-13 09:08 +0000
  Re: [CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works" Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-13 22:51 -0700
    Re: [CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works" Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2014-03-14 09:56 +0000
      Re: [CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works" Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2014-03-14 10:56 +0000
        Re: [CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works" Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2014-03-14 11:35 +0000
          Re: [CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works" Morten Nygaard Åsnes <mnaasnes@gmail.com> - 2014-03-14 13:41 +0100
            Re: [CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works" greymausg <maus@mail.com> - 2014-03-14 16:55 +0000
              Re: [CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works" Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-14 13:20 -0700
          Re: [CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works" Johny B Good <johnny-b-good@invalid.ntlworld.com> - 2014-03-14 16:51 +0000
            Re: [CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works" Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-03-16 05:34 +0100
              Re: [CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works" greymausg <maus@mail.com> - 2014-03-16 10:55 +0000
                Re: [CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works" Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-03-16 19:40 +0100
          Re: [CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works" Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2014-03-15 20:24 +0000
        Re: [CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works" Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-03-16 05:16 +0100
          Re: [CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works" Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-17 16:54 -0700
      Re: [CM] "Encrypt everything" vs "advertising is how it works" Johny B Good <johnny-b-good@invalid.ntlworld.com> - 2014-03-14 16:38 +0000

csiph-web